 |
|  |
 |
|
DuncanK
|
 |
Evil Empire
Dec 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
This is fun. Keep them coming. 
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
In other words, if I didn't give you the hooks for free, you'd steal them.
|
It wouldn't be stealing, because you were exploiting us. It's like taking back what was stole from you.
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
The example is, overall, not very good. Let's say that fish hook making is my skill. Yours is cooking - you're a good cook. Vel is good at... cleaning the fist (preparing them to be cooked. He's a wiz at it). Azazel is just brilliant at doing the actual fishing - he just knows where the fish are.
Now, it would be best if I made the hooks, Azazel fished, Vel cleaned and you cooked. Each of us brings something to the proverbial table, and we trade each other our skills and everyone wins. We all exploit each other. But that's not a market economy, so it doesn't really translate.
-Arrian |
This would work good for a while, but one of us would be required to do the least amount of work, and one of us would be required to do the most amount of work. In theory, the person who was required to do the least amount of work would increase his work load and create a surplus. After he created that surplus he would then use that surplus to trade while he started competing in another industry. In that industry he could trade at a lower price for his goods and force the other person in that industry out of business. The person losing his business would then have no other choice but to accept employment with the newly formed capitalist. Thus you have a fully functioning and exploitive capitalist system. This capitalist would eventually be ruler over the rest. He could sit around and think about new ways to exploit us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Iron Chancellor
|
|
Of course, there is the saying "Democracy is the only government where the people get what they deserve."
And that fascist, Nazi-sympathising demagogue, Winston Churchill, "The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter."
Of course, I have to ask how communists can call anything evil or wrong or unethical if they do not believe in absolutes of good or evil.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Willem
|
 |
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
A government doesn't and shouldn't think that way, and should not try to increase 'profits', but to create a strong economical fundament. I think that this should be done by creating industries, predicting the supply because of the fact that the same system creates the demand .
It should be done by constantly streamlining the govt. according to scientific models, keeping an independent media that would detect malfunctions, creating a variety of products by competing designs, that would shift production capabilities according to demand.
|
There's no reason why that can't be done within a capitalist system. Here in Canada we have what we call Crown corporations. They're owned by the government but managed independantly just like any other corporation, and compete openly and fairly with the rest of the players. Some of them, like PetroCanada, have done quite well, without stifling the free market or private enterprise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:25
|
|
quote: Damn, Imran beat me to it.
The private sector is accountable. If a company chooses poorly, its shareholders will oust management. If it does REALLY poorly, it will go under. If it cheats, its executives will face law enforcement (needs to be better, clearly).
|
There are different ways of organizing accountabilty in socialism as well.
in a more decentralized scenario, one company would sue the other. The management would be chosen by the workers, for example.
It could complain to oversight, that would change the management.
there are different ways to tackle such a problem.
quote:
There's no reason why that can't be done within a capitalist system. Here in Canada we have what we call Crown corporations. They're owned by the government but managed independantly just like any other corporation, and compete openly and fairly with the rest of the players. Some of them, like PetroCanada, have done quite well, without stifling the free market or private enterprise.
|
Well, if they're doing well, why do we need private ownership of industry as a pre-requisite of good management, and effectivness?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|