 |
|  |
 |
|
ZargonX
|
 |
Space
Sep 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Not only I don't find this an optimal solution, like you said, Zargon, but I find it totally unacceptable. Any solution involving GS gaining land on Bob is utterly out of question for me.
|
Don't worry, Tiberius, I don't really think it's optimal either. Nor do I even think it's possible. Honor Code or no, I'm willing to believe that GS would stomp RP into the ground if they won the war to claim Bob for themselves. If it looked like a path to victory, they'd take it.
I feel kind of bad for Arnelos, because he was gone when RP diplo went so, so wrong. He's clearly trying to mend fences now, and while I appreciate that, I don't think RP is going to be around long enough for it to pay off 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
OK, read through the chatlog... just a couple of comments:
Z, it is completely up to you... but I'd suggest being a bit more careful about expressing agreement about what the other party says (like that 'optimal solution' part). Sometimes, your comments, which we know are largely meant as a formality or simply maintaining polite conversation, may lead the other party into believeing you like the ideas presented and support them. While I am not saying it is a bad thing overall and under every circumstances, it can later, when the other party finds out how things really are, be held against you personally (or even against the team).
Even if I do not care about whether RP FAM is mad at us or not, it's always better to avoid 'misunderstandings' of this kind. I am not mentioning this specifically because of this chat, because you did well, cleverly avoiding the need to tell Arnelos what kind of a power setup we are preferring on Bob. Just keep it in your mind when talking to other teams... it has bitten you/us in the past (with the GoW tech deal) and I can see it's sort of your habit to talk in this manner.
Not meant as a rant, really - I am mentioning it here especially because it has not really done any harm this time... allowing for a point made not in anger or displeasure.
And now regarding the chat:
I have to say I really dislike the way RPers act. They seem to be the least honourable, least noble team of this whole game. Just think of it - in this chat, they are in fact plotting against GS, which is the team that has helped them survive. I know, GS had other reasons to intervene, too, but I still find it very difficult to swallow. It is as if Voxes started plotting against us. I believe that when you lose, you shall admit it, and if you are left alive, it's imperative you do not turn against the one that left you alive or - even worse - against the one that helped you survive. :shrug:
Arnelos is in fact trying to persuade us that a "stable" world involves Bob divided between them, GS (but not much ...), and Vox (and maybe ND and GoW, if they are "reasonable" ...). Do you find this idea as crazy as I do? I think Bob split in half between ND and GoW is MUCH more stable. Neither of the Bobian powers would risk attacking the other one, as, obviously, non-Bobian powers would immediately intervene. Neither of non-Bobian powers will be in a position to invade Bob once RRs appear... I believe that THAT is what best suits our plans (no surprise, as that's the plan we currently follow), as we are fairly confident we will be able to outbuild GoW & ND, while not having to care about GS. There is no room for RP in this equation.
Second, Arnelos is trying to persuade us that the war is going well. Not sure if he really believes that or is just pretending it, but we know the war is NOT going well for them - and that it will get worse soon with the arrival of GoW/ND muskets.
Third, Arnelos has been kind enough to assure us RPers would be willing to be friendly to and trade with us. BEG YOUR PARDON? I've always thought there was a treaty binding them to be our friends and trading partners! I'd bet my last cent on that RPers would turn against us the very first moment they could gain from it. There is no other team as untrustworthy as them... Tibi puts it right - deeds, not words.
And redstar makes another excellent point - with other teams committed to warring and us happily building, the world is just wonderful.
All in all... I believe this chat has been yet another example of an RP diplomat trying to pull something that cannot really be pulled... something based upon quite incorrect assumptions - and possibly using arguments which only fools would believe.
I am just looking forward to seeing Aggie posting "save sent to Vox" soooo much... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sharpe
That being said I am growing more concerned about us perhaps helping create a monster that we can't handle in helping GoW and ND. From the ISDG and from GoW actions in the PTWDG1, it is becoming more clear that GoW and ND are welded together at the hip - a nearly unbreakable alliance. We can't allow them to control all of Bob IMHO - their capacity for growth, commerce and shields would vastly outnumber ours. |
I, too, believe GoW and ND are cooperating very closely, beyond what their own selfish goals would cover... and that they do trust each other. However, I'm not all that concerned about them controlling the whole of Bob. Bob is about twice the size of Legos Major - so, if they split Bob into two halves of approximately the same size, they would only get what we already have (and what we have been developing since Turn 1 - unlike them). Their COMBINED potential would be something to worry about, if we were to face it alone. But if you combine their potential, you must combine also the potential of the rest of the world. And I am fairly confident that us, Vox, and GS would be just the proper counterbalance.
ATM, we are able to match or nearly match both GoW and ND in all aspects... and they are in their GA, while we are not! That says a lot.
quote: Originally posted by Sharpe
I am also worried that now that it is known that GS has no easy access to saltpeter, that the Bob alliance may be regarding us as their remaining threat - as we do have saltpeter, more territory and vastly more shield capacity than GS (even they can see that from their maps). |
Now, out of the remaining teams, we would be the strongest rival, that's correct. However, that's exactly why we would be the LAST target... they know very well that we would be a very tough nut to crack - and the very minute they turn hostile, we gift saltpeter to GS... and there's a world war with two very similarly powerful sides (us+GS+Vox would be of the same power as GoW+ND).
Now, I do not think that ANY hostile action from their side is technically possible within a foreseeable future. GoW and ND will have tough time getting rid of RP, they will lose many units, spend a lot of gold, their whole GA... while we are happily building our a$$es off here, with all those aqueducts, workers, and whatnot...
While carefully watching the situation is definitely a must, I do not think anything prompts a change in our mid-term strategy. Let's make sure GS does not gain any foothold on Bob - up to the extent of having Bob divided between GoW and ND only. With RP gone, GS cut to size, and ND and GoW facing the rebuild phase, we will have time enough to respond to whatever might happen we currently cannot foresee.
Keep in mind that even after GoW and ND conquer the whole of Bob, they will have to (re)settle it, redistribute their cities, build infrastructure in them, develop the surrounding lands - and until THAT is done (quite some time, as only GoW is industrious), they will be extremely vulnerable, as undeveloped lands are easier to invade than fully (rail)roaded terrain with (barracked) cities conveniently placed all along the border/coast.
Another point worth making: GS is weak or no threat only as long as having no saltpeter. Give them 'peter and they are a power to consider. Weaker than us, but still something you cannot leave unchecked in your backyard. So - as long as we are with GoW and ND, they do not have to fear GS that much (at least I hope so). But if they turn against us, we help GS quickly rise to power again (not that I would be dying to get that far).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kloreep

|
 |
of the pillow
Jun 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
PM from Arnelos
quote: Kloreep,
(copy of message sent to ZargonX)
Despite our victory this turn against some GoW riders, it is apparent that we cannot stand against the hordes. Between GS and RP, we simply do not have the forces to stop them from sweeping Southern Bob. Through the majority of the war, they have kept so many riders stacked together that we can only hope to wound some, most of which retreat. Only a few have we killed.
From what we have heard and what we have seen, we suspect that GoW and ND possess UU's totalling more than 30 each, almost all of which are likely to survive the current war to claim all of Bob for their two civs.
Should such an enormous force of UU's survive this war, it would be relatively easy for them to build fleets for the invasion of Legos and Stormia. Given that the GoW is dedicated to winning the game by force of arms, this is their goal, irregardless of what hollow claims they may make to other civilizations. Afterall, GoW was still officially allied to RP when they attacked. Should they see an opportunity to strike Stormia and Legos to win the game, they will not hesitate to do so. The same goes for ND and these two allies seem far closer to each other than RP and GS, or anyone to Lego.
If Legoland is interested in preventing an ND/GoW victory over all of Bob, it is imperative that you act now or never. I am not waxing melodramatic when I say that RP could very well be wiped off of Bob in the next few turns, along with GS holdings in Southern Bob. Despite the small victories we have been afforded recently, the odds are simply too overwhelming. Once they bring their full army off healthy UUs to bear, the most we can hope to do is slow them down.
There is one thing that might give us a chance to actually hold Southern Bob and that is gunpowder, which we are aware that you possess. Since we may not have a source of saltpeter already linked, it may be necessary (on a temporary basis) to provide that as well if you have it.
Aside from the obvious benefit of preventing ND and GoW from claiming all of Bob with plenty of Riders and Ansar Warriors left over to invade other continents, if you are willing to substantially aid us, we can offer you future binding agreements to provide our luxuries to you when we regain our land as well as an offer from GS to provide you with incense (of which they have extra). I have spoken to GS about that and they seem willing to provide their incense to Legoland in return for RP having a fighting chance to itself.
In terms of other conditions upon such an agreement, we can understand if you have certain concerns about whether gunpowder would be shared with GS, something which we are fully willing to negotiate with you. In short, our position is truly desperate and we're willing to take aid where we can get it, how we can get it. It may even be possible to get GS to agree to such an arrangement (I have begun discussing this with them).
In terms of other issues, I have already told you what our goals in this war are and how I believe the interests of Lego, RP, Vox, and GS to contain ND and GoW while retaining the balance of power could all be achieved without imperiling Legoland's long-term interests. I have also laid out how the rest of the game could be played from that point and GS seems entirely open to this possibility, should we be able to sign a treaty to its effect. I believe it possible to sign such a treaty and to ensure that it is honored.
So I would greatly appreciate it if I was able to discuss these matters with Legoland this evening in chat. I would also be highly appreciative if Legoland, when they do receive the save, HOLD the save until your consultative decision-making body is able to come to a decision on matters and thus still have time to act on such a decision, should you decide how I might hope.
Thank You.
- Prince Regent Francisco Clemente, Duque de Madrid, Chief Ambassador of the Spanish Crown |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ZargonX
|
 |
Space
Sep 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
Well, I think Arnelos is being honest, I think he just had the misfortune of stepping in to try and fix the diplomatic minefield Togas left for him. Regardless, giving them GP would be useless for them, harmful for us. I would make the following points in chat:
-Tell them giving them GP is not going to help them.
-Explain we'd rather get GP to GS on our own terms, not have them turn around and gift it.
-We are not providing military or economic aid to either GoW or ND (true), thus we can't hurt them that way.
-Our military is defense-based, so we won't be attacking GoW or ND to assist them.
At that point, they should realize there really isn't anything we can do to save them that wouldn't harm ourselves, which we certainly wouldn't be doing. If he is still pleading, tell HIM to propose something then, other than just showing up begging for us to come up with something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Session Start: Tue Oct 21 22:31:22 2003
Session Ident: Arnelos
vondrack: Hello!
Arnelos: hey
vondrack: I have no good news for you
Arnelos: so I figured
vondrack: said very briefly, Legoland is not going to help
vondrack: actually
vondrack: more or less, the only help possible would be direct military intervention
vondrack: and we are not going to do that
Arnelos: I seem to think that Gunpowder would give us a fighting chance
vondrack: I understand you would believe so
vondrack: but it's not true
Arnelos: at the very least, it might bleed GoW and ND some more UUs
Arnelos: and that can't hurt anyone but them
Arnelos: so I have been lead to believe
vondrack: the map generator screwed some teams big time
vondrack: speaking about saltpeter, that is
vondrack: though... I am actually disclosing something that is not all that relevant
vondrack: the thing is that the whole problem with the world's saltpeter deposits
Arnelos: is that legoland has the lion's share of them, no?
vondrack: has nothing to do with our involvement in the war
vondrack: ah, no... not lion's share, I would not put it that way
vondrack: enough
vondrack: though quite inconveniently located
vondrack: but that's, as I said, not the reason for withholding our help
Arnelos: you're allied to GoW
Arnelos: which, if I dare say so, will eventually come back to bite you
vondrack: I am sorry, I cannot answer questions regarding alliances Legoland may or may not be part of
Arnelos: 
vondrack: if it was a question, that is... 
Arnelos: We've actually believed you were allied with GoW for quite some time now
Arnelos: QUITE some time
Arnelos: here's the thing... you guys helping GoW made a ton of sense, I will admit, when GS entered the war to help us
Arnelos: but that's no longer true
Arnelos: GS and RP are not winning this war
Arnelos: until GoW and ND are re-contained, you run the very real risk that you will help them break out and eventually even threaten you
Arnelos: keeping Bob weak and divided would seem the superior option
vondrack: it's difficult for me to discuss these things - as I have said, I can't confirm nor deny that we may or may not be allied/friendly/unfriendly/hostile towards another team 
vondrack: so, let's talk academic
Arnelos: my team is on the brink of either surviving or being killed off... I have no time for academic discussions... you're allied with GoW. I'm trying to tell you, reasonably, that this is no longer a policy which fits your interests. That it happens to be hurting us as well is why I'm saying it, of course.
Arnelos: but that doesn't prevent it from being true, either
Arnelos: fact is, if ND and GoW actually *win* this war, which is looking much more likely, they will have the power to start looking for other targets
Arnelos: and, to be perfectly honest, Legoland is the rusty third wheel of the ND-GoW relationship
vondrack: Arnelos, let's not get into this, please
vondrack: there is, I am sorry, nothing you can do to change things
Arnelos: there is, you're simply choosing not to exercise it
Arnelos: the bone-crushing momentum of previous policy
vondrack: I meant that you, Arnelos (and for that matter, even me, vondrack), cannot do anything to change the Legoland's decision
Arnelos: YOU can't change it?
vondrack: it's not that we would be hesitating, still waging pros and cons
Arnelos: I have been lead to believe otherwise. It's not that you can't, it's that you won't
vondrack: explain, please
vondrack: do you think I have any special powers in Legoland?
Arnelos: Legoland retains the power of freedom of action... you have it within your power to change course. That you are choosing not to is a choice of your own volition. No-one is forcing you to hold to the present course, with the dangers that lay ahead.
vondrack: oh, yes, that's true
Arnelos: I happen to believe that you are one of the principle individuals opposed to changing course... multiple individuals from Legoland have mentioned this... that the main obstacle to changing Legoland policy is you.
vondrack: ummm... things in Legoland are decided by polls
vondrack: my vote is as important as any other
Arnelos: while true, apparently you hold more weight over other people's votes than you might assume
vondrack: like I can influence them?
Arnelos: votes are decided as much by convincing arguments as by anything else
vondrack: well, that is often true
Arnelos: look... I understand that I come to you as a highly biased source. I obviously have a vested interest in my own team's survival.... that said...
Arnelos: that said, it's still true, as I see it, that Legoland is encouraging a dangerous future for itself by continuing to support the Glory of War. It has the rather troubling potential of coming back to bite you.
Arnelos: I'm not making that up
vondrack: I understand your concerns. But Legoland is not taking its future lightly. We have been discussing the situation quite a bit.
vondrack: And the result was
vondrack: (it changed radically after GS entered the war)
vondrack: that we chose to not assist you
vondrack: it may have been the wrong thing to do
Arnelos: the point is... there is an option you could exercise that would have significantly less chance of biting you back. The word of Gathering Storm is their bond. We have found that they have performed to every letter of our treaties with them. We are willing to do the same... we have little left to gain by not doing so.
Arnelos: I have discussed the matter with Gathering Storm and they seem willing to sign a treaty with Legoland in which they would bind themselves to an honorable non-aggression agreement if Legoland would cease support for GoW and instead work with us
Arnelos: the key of the matter is that where GoW would violate such an agreement in a heartbeat if the opportunity presented itself, our teams would not
Arnelos: I believe we can achieve a genuine commitment to ending the game in a peaceable fashion
vondrack: Arnelos, I am sorry I cannot give you an answer that would make you happier - but I am here communicating the stance of my team (though not denying it's my own, too)
vondrack: we heard your proposals, your arguments
vondrack: you may be right
vondrack: we admit that
vondrack: but still, we made our minds
vondrack: and we are not going to change the decision
Arnelos: hmm
Arnelos: I suppose the best I can hope for is that at some point in the not too distant future, I may yet be a member of Legoland myself when RP goes down 
vondrack: 
vondrack: not sure if you'd enjoy our "social life"
Arnelos: lol
vondrack: sometimes it takes days between posts... 
Arnelos: sounds like RP of late
Arnelos: well, until the game started moving agian
vondrack: that's because of the bug, yes
vondrack: but even when the game is going on
vondrack: the forum is not all that busy
Arnelos: yeah, I think the PTWDG, in general, has slowed over the past 2 months...
Arnelos: activity has fallen, sapped by other pursuits
vondrack: true
vondrack: I have to admit that my interest in DGs
vondrack: is getting weaker and weaker...
vondrack: I find it difficult
vondrack: to pitch myself against other people - not only ingame enemies, but even against my teammates
vondrack: if we disagree on something
vondrack: (and there were a LOT of times this happened in Lego)
Arnelos: indeed
Arnelos: on any team
Arnelos: hell, we've had two attempted revolutions on this team 
vondrack: btw - I love your ISDG turnlogs 
Arnelos: yeah, I only got to do 2 of them
Arnelos: thanks
vondrack: as much as I just fear BigFree's... 
Arnelos: lol
Arnelos: that was actually a point of rather high argument in RP in 280 A.D. last turn
Arnelos: because the turn had to be replayed
Arnelos: BigFree hadn't really recorded what he did very well
vondrack: yeah
vondrack: 
Arnelos: so I had to get Trip to look at Vox's save and use the reload bug to see where BigFree moved our units
vondrack: 
vondrack: I managed to have Lego players make very detailed records
vondrack: besides, it's almost always either me or Zargon
Arnelos: meanwhile, I was pissed as hell that our units had moved where they did... the current battle between GoW and RP is the result... that battle should have never happened... Aggie is right to taunt us, I'm just trying to hold face and repair what damage I can
vondrack: oh? was it a team decision?
Arnelos: that said, thankfully GoW still underestimates our defenses 
Arnelos: no
vondrack: hehe - watch your words... if we are allied to GoW... 
Arnelos: BigFree moved the units, then we held the save for a bit... then Togas signed on, repeated BigFRee's moves and just sent it to the next team without a turnchat or even looking at it himself.... he said it had been 24 hours and we just needed to send on the save... it was a stupid move
Arnelos: GoW took advantage of the situation, of course
vondrack: oops...
Arnelos: but that's behind us... we're making the best of our current situation
Arnelos: alrighty, I should go post in our forum and move on the game
vondrack: ok, hope to meet you again under more cheerful circumstances
Arnelos: perhaps so
Arnelos: either things may go better than I believe they will, or, if they go badly (as I expect in the long run), I may yet join in you Legoland
vondrack: I will personally vote for you to be adopted 
Arnelos: 
vondrack: though... maybe you should thence restrict yourself to reading only SOME threads... 
Arnelos: and vondrack... something else to mention...
vondrack: yes?
Arnelos: Keep in mind that I was not active on RP team from the time we made contact with Legoland (which I had worked on with sending you guys the minimaps of Bob) and the GoW/ND-RP war
Arnelos: it seems to me that a lot of history happpened in there
Arnelos: most of it not good
vondrack: most of, actually...
vondrack: yes 
vondrack: that's why I understand that you are trying to fix things now and feel bad for not being able to help you out
Arnelos: ah
vondrack: but things moved a lot while you were away
vondrack: an awful lot happened
Arnelos: yeah, it sounds to me like our team made way too much of a big deal out of that start-of-game agreement.... it may not be a good idea to sign those in future games... a good leason to learn
vondrack: well - the only problem I can see
vondrack: might be that you thought the deal was something different from what we thought it was
vondrack: we though it was two-way, mutual
Arnelos: it was a bit vague
Arnelos: ah....
Arnelos: I see
vondrack: yes, it must have been, I guess
Arnelos: the whole thing was like 4 lines
vondrack: but the thing is that many times, we felt as if RP saw it as one-way (as in "you still pay for getting Carthage")
vondrack: I made a very lame attempt at explaining that in the ISDG thread - but spoiled the whole thing by the part on Togas
vondrack: I later regretted that post a lot
Arnelos: in effect, the agreement was the "price" for Legoland getting Carthage... which is my point. I don't think establishing a debter-debtee relationship like that at the start of the game was productive for relations... especially when our team harped on it
vondrack: ah, so - RP _did_ see it as a debter-debtee?
Arnelos: yes
Arnelos: that was the team's understanding of the treaty
Arnelos: that it was the price for Carthage
vondrack: do you have the wording of the treaty somewhere?
Arnelos: sure... lemme get that
Arnelos: We, the Roleplay team, hereby promise that we will give the Legoland team the civilization of Carthage and we will cooperate with research (each team researching different paths and then trading).
Arnelos: In exchange, Legoland promises to not declare war on or join in any war against the Roleplay Civilization at any time prior to 1000 AD, to give the Roleplay Civilization "Most Favored Nation" trade status (which shall include selling us techs at a lower price than any other civ), and cooperate with research as explained above.
Arnelos: Both teams also pledge to try to maintain good relations throughout the game and to attempt to cooperate for the mutual protection and success of our civilizations.
Arnelos: Signed in 4000 BC
vondrack: yes, that's the text I have always been referring to as well
vondrack: so that was not the problem
vondrack: the problem is - when you read through it
vondrack: what actually came to fruition?
Arnelos: I'd agree that RP made more of the "most favored nation" thing than they should have... harped on it way too much. That said, many on RP remain resentful in the present conflict of the non-aggression portion (not joining another at war with RP)
Arnelos: in all, the treaty just didn't work
vondrack: the problem is it is not a war of RP against GoW+ND
vondrack: not only
Arnelos: too vague and too binding on future action
vondrack: the GS bit messed things badly
vondrack: agreed
vondrack: trading civs pre-game for something ingame is just no-no for any future games
Arnelos: agreed
vondrack: especially if that something is vaguely defined
Arnelos: a good lesson learned, as I said
vondrack: pity you have to pay so many hours for such a lesson 
Arnelos: well, I should probably get going, since I have other things to do today. As for you, it's what? 10:30 or 11:30 p.m. there?
vondrack: 11:30pm
Arnelos: alright, thanks for the chat, even if it didn't work out as hoped
vondrack: yeah - take care
vondrack: good night
Arnelos: cya
Session Close: Tue Oct 21 23:28:38 2003 |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Nimitz
I wasn't around for the start of the alliance, but if I had I would of been more for the pushing out of GS from bob and just trimming RP as 3 nations on bob is better then just 2. |
I believe that would have been the choice for all of us - alas, this option was not actually available. Not helping GoW & ND carried a serious implied risk of having them fall to GS in the long run, effectively allowing GS to win the game.
If we wanted to prevent that, there was, more or less, only one other choice - to get in bed with them. We DID limit our involvement in the war quite strictly. We said we'd join no military actions against RP (though it would be ridiculous to pretend that our involvement was not hostile towards RP and in fact against the spirit of the pre-game treaty) and that we'd not join invasion of Stormia. But other than that, we had to make our choice - sleeping in two beds at the same time means you are not really in any of them. So we chose to work towards a 2-civ Bob, which we hope to be able to handle peacefully (outbuilding both GoW and ND in the long run).
It's pretty much the same situation at this very moment. We can see GoW & ND will probably win even without our extensive help. But while changing sides just to "keep the balance and fuel the war" might benefit us short term, it would harm our reputation long-term.
At the moment, we have one team indebted and I hope honestly friendly to us (Vox), wishing to help us win. We have 2 more teams very friendly to us, at least for now and the foreseeable future (GoW & ND). These 2 teams are economically little threat to the never-struck-by-war Legoland empire (even combined). And then we have two teams that we have always been having troubles with - RP (soon to leave the game it seems) and GS (so far our main competitor for the victory in this game).
When RP is dead and the alliance goals achieved (GS cut to size on Stormia), we will be the key to the world's balance of power (thanks to how the saltpeter deposits are distributed). Without our approval, GoW & ND will have little chance to invade Stormia successfully - as our saltpeter would turn it into Fortress Stormia (plus, we would be free to attack from the West).
Changing sides NOW would only mean we would make two teams (GoW & ND) very angry at us, while gaining little love from GS & RP - as they would likely view our decision as self-interest driven, thus establishing very little "debt" (and would turn against us any time in the future, I suspect). OTOH, since there is no or very little (immediate, at least) benefit to supporting GoW & ND now (as opposed to 20 turns ago), it DOES help our trustworthiness and long-term bonds with these teams.
And frankly - with Vox being our little brother, GoW & ND being sort of indebted to us (the gunpowder thing is a MAJOR one, especially if you add NOT providing saltpeter to RP/GS) and having the whole of Bob to (re)settle and improve, GS cut to size on Stormia and RP gone... where is any threat to us? In case Bobians try to be naughty, we equip GS with saltpeter and the balance of power is back (the only caveat being GS deliberately NOT helping us, which I, however, not consider probable, given how relations have developed in this game).
So, to sum things up - I don't say we'd gain nothing by breaking the alliance. It's a valid and perhaps even fine option in terms of coldblooded calculations. But the possible gain is far less than what I believe is the "price of our honour". It's not that the only way to win this game is to break our alliance now. I strongly believe we can win even if remaining honourable and true to our current allies.
So, let's avoid backstabbing, at least for the moment. I happen to believe we can afford it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ZargonX
|
 |
Space
Sep 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: ZargonX,
I'm sending messages out to the leaderships of the various teams notifying them of my position as turnplayer and leader of RP Team during Togas' absence. I may also have a heightened role after Togas' return, don't know.
Please send all diplomatic traffic/requests for RP Team to me for now.
Thanks.
- Arnelos |
Last edited by vondrack on 01-05-2004 at 20:30
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|