 |
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
Just a note: I care about the "most favoured nation" stuff only as far as there is a price we have to "meet" (like this time with Edu/GS). As soon as we are 1 gold under a price we sold something to someone else, it is - for me - the most favoured nation price. Togas loves nitpicking on the wording (as opposed to the spirit) of treaties, so I have absolutely no problem with that.
Otherwise, the RPers have been the most difficult team to deal with, they have always been extremely greedy in their "offers" and demands (remember what they asked for the no-Sistine clause! or for "helping" Voxes...), have been less helpful than any other team and never treated us as a true partner or ally. So aside from offering them a "better" price whenever there is a price to match, I have absolutely no desire to keep them happy.
They are fortunately so untrustworthy, that I cannot imagine any other Bobian or GS would join them in an attack at us any time soon, so if they dislike or hate us, so be it.
I would still start with sending them a trade agreement with no sum filled in. Let's see how much they value Edu... let's see if they ever learn... and finally go for a really fair deal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ZargonX
|
 |
Space
Sep 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
Ok, here's the draft I sent Togas...
quote:
People of Espana,
In the spirit of friendship, the citizens of Legoland wish to propose the following to you:
We, Legoland, shall give the knowledge of Education.
In exchange, the people of Espana will provide 230 gold, as well as agree to a 20-turn Non-disclosure, no-resale agreement.
We hope that these terms are agreeable to you, and we look forward to continued dealings.
ZargonX,
President of Legoland
|
I settled on the 230 figure as a compromise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ZargonX
|
 |
Space
Sep 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
So, after sending the proposal to RP, BigFree contacted me and said that RP couldn't afford to spend any gold right now, as they are prepping for war. So that deal is on hold indefinately.
Next, Aidun contacted me about alliance possibilities...
quote:
Aidun> Hi
ZargonX> Hello, Aidun!
ZargonX> Be with you in one second...
Aidun> ready?
ZargonX> yes, I'm here
ZargonX> sorry, had a phone call
ZargonX> anyway, let us discuss the issues at hand 
ZargonX> So, first off, could you tell me how the situation is looking from your end?
Aidun> Well, let me first state that the situation is strange
ZargonX> in what manner?
Aidun> GoW is acting very strange again. Master Zen first refused to sell chivalry to us, but then agreed for the price of 500 gold. this is ridiculous
Aidun> We have not agreed of course
ZargonX> that is rather pricy...
Aidun> The second thging is that GoW is saying that all is fine, while things aren't fine at all
Aidun> yes
ZargonX> hmmm... do you fear a GoW attack only, or an ND-GoW attack?
Aidun> This price was, as you maybe know, a lot lower for other civs
Aidun> Soldiers are trained like mad
Aidun> here
Aidun> We do not expect ND to attack us, but GoW seems to be on warpath again
ZargonX> do you think the attack will come sooner rather than later?
Aidun> We think but that GoW is using this strategy:
Aidun> They bribe ND to attack us and then all Ansars are on ND's southern border, GoW attacks ND in the north. Then GoW can easily conquer the ND production centers and it is good bye ND. After that It is Good bye Spain.
ZargonX> hmm... that would be a plausable scenario
Aidun> After that it is either Goodbye Lego or Goodbye GS
Aidun> only a matter of time
ZargonX> have you spoken to ND at all about this concerns?
Aidun> when GoW has entire Bob, they will outnumber you in forces and power in anay way
ZargonX> yes, someone controlling all of Bob would be very formidable, indeed
ZargonX> I do not think any civs in the world would be interested in seeing a one-civ Bob, by any means
Aidun> Yes, we don't have a NAP with ND, but negotiations are going on.
ZargonX> that's good to hear
Aidun> We have explained this to ND and made an agreement, but it still needs to be discussed by parliaments etc.
ZargonX> of course; team concensus is always important 
Aidun> It is just now that we see a benefit for both of us joining in an alliance. For us the benefit is on the short term, for you on the long term: no Bobian superpower
ZargonX> Do you have a specific set of proposals for us?
Aidun> We would like to blow the dust of our proto-alliance-agreement but then without the demand of the map of Lego
Aidun> As we know that it is difficult for you to give it
ZargonX> yes, that is always a sticking point for us
ZargonX> so, you would want to build off the original proto-alliance, with new clauses?
Aidun> Perhaps we could agree that a ship of us may scout your coastline, but that can also be decided apart form this agreement
ZargonX> Well, as always, I will have to confer with the rest of the Lego Senate
ZargonX> but if you PM with a draft, we can look it over in short order
ZargonX> and then we can work from there
Aidun> of course, that is why it can better be left out of the allaince
ZargonX> yes, better to deal with more important issues in the main body of the agreement
ZargonX> when could you have a draft?
Aidun> All we want is a defensive alliance with you, we will come to your aid and you will come to ours. I know that war is not what you are waiting for, but I see a moment coming near that even Legoland will, like the US had to do too in WW2 although they prefered to stay out of it, take the arms and go for war. You can't escape form war, sooner or later you will have to face it. Better sooner than later
ZargonX> Yes, war seems to be a sad inevitability in this game, of that we are fully aware
ZargonX> and no one wants to see a superpower in the world
Aidun> Then we can better have peace and be close allies than opposing and fighting each other. tell that to your teammates.
Aidun> Agree
ZargonX> I will, of course, pass along the message of peace 
ZargonX> Do you fear the war will be coming shortly?
Aidun> We don't want to see it either. We have stayed out of any conflict until now, even in the Voxian war, we have told ND that we want to stay at peace with them and that we trust them
Aidun> BTW, ND told us the same
Aidun> so that is positive
ZargonX> yes, that is a good sign
ZargonX> ND seems a trustworthy team, in general
Aidun> I agree with that. In the past we doubted a bit when they got quite poaweful. That was in and after the Luxian time, but time has changed, and they ahev remained trustworthy, far more trustworthyb than GoW
ZargonX> ah, the Lux days... time long gone by....
Aidun> We don't exactly know when the war will start. I have tried to predict it, but that is based on just one strategy while there are many.
ZargonX> yes, it is always hard to predict these things
ZargonX> though, I would imagine those civs with UUs would want to take advantage of them while they are still useful
Aidun> yes, but the age of the riders and ansars will not soon pass by. the medieval days seem to take as long as in RL
ZargonX> 
Aidun> 
ZargonX> Ok, I guess the best way to proceed forward is for RP to create a new draft agreement, and pass it along to us in short order
ZargonX> we can review it, and then more on from there
Aidun> it is important that we get it passed soon. I will look it up as soon as I can, or someone
else of our team will do
ZargonX> excellent
ZargonX> I will present it to the team as soon as I receive it
Aidun> I want to inform you of one other thing
ZargonX> yes?
Aidun> The strategy of GoW with ND is not the only one.
Aidun> How are your contacts with GS
ZargonX> GS?
Aidun> Sailing over the sea is pretty easy with the Lighthouse
ZargonX> You fear they would come to Bob?
Aidun> I have strictly confidential info: GS has refused a NAP
ZargonX> hrm... I would not think they would be so bold as to try Bob...
ZargonX> that is quite an undertaking
Aidun> to be exact: a NAP bound to trade deals
ZargonX> ah
Aidun> but still. You guys don't want to see GS invade Bob too
ZargonX> No, not at all
ZargonX> GS having controlling interests in Bob is a very scary thought
Aidun> but they still have an army that is strong and the borders with Vox hardly need any defense
ZargonX> yes, Vox seems to be out of the picture
Aidun> unless you'd let them develop in the north.
Aidun> Tose land aren't too bad
ZargonX> you've seen?
Aidun> I can see the coastline of it. We musrt have acquired it by trading WM's
ZargonX> yes... the coast looks nice...
ZargonX> it's not so nice once you get off the beach :P
Aidun> ah poor voxians
Aidun> 
ZargonX> anyway, I'm sorry to run, but I have some RL business I must take care of 
ZargonX> I will back a little later though, but I suppose that's quite late for you
Aidun> Ok, I'll PM you ASAP
ZargonX> sounds good to me!
Aidun> make sure your parliament agrees
ZargonX> I will be ready for it
ZargonX> I will present it to them and we shall discuss it as urgent
ZargonX> so, until later!
ZargonX> it's been a pleasure!
Aidun> cya
Aidun> to me too
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ZargonX
|
 |
Space
Sep 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
And here's the draft...
quote:
El tratado de defensa Hispano - Legolandico / Legoland - Spain Mutual Protection Treaty
Article I
Definition of the territory
The territory of Spain is defined as all land inside Spain's cultural borders and all lands on the continent named Bob south of the Spanish city of Toledo.
The territory of Legoland is defined as all land on Legos Major.
Article II
Redefinition of the territory
Either party may propose to redefine their national territory and the change shall be effective upon the agreement of the other party.
Definition of the territory of both parties may be changed if:
New territories will be found, under the condition that these new territories are fully explored and unsettled by any other nation;
New settlements, that are outside of the land defined in Article I, are founded;
New territory, that is outside of the land defined in Article I, is accuired in any way;
Territory, that is part of the land defined in Article I, is lost in any way.
Article III
Causes that activate the alliance
If another nation settles on the land that is defined in Article I, while the party that claims this land has informed an official of the settling nation, that they claim those lands, both the offended party and the other party in the treaty will declare war on the settling nation, if the party that claims these land requests this, unless the alliance can persuade the settling nation from either evacuating or handing the settlement over to the alliance member whose territory is occupied, or retreat in any other way.
If any violation of the territorial integrity of the territory of either party, as defined in Article I, is being conducted, both parties will declare war on the atacking nation, if the attacked party requests this.
Article IV
Non-settlement & Non-agression ageement
Neither party shall settle in the territoriy that the other party has claimed to be his as stated in Article I. Neither party shall enter the claimed territory of the other party without prior approval. Also neither party shall declare war on the other.
Article V
Duration of the Treaty
The Treaty shall have a lenth of 30 turns. It shall be effective from 70 BC (turn nr. 124) and expire in 380 AD (turn 154).
The Treaty may be extended for any amount of turns upon the agreement of both parties.
Article VI
Settlement of any war
Since both parties will declare war at the exact same time on any invading party, both parties will commit themselves to end the war at the same time. No separate peace treaties shall be made.
Justino Togas I, King of Spain
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
OK, I have won my bet.
Have you learned anything interesting, Zargon? 
j/k
Now, what do we do with this... ahem... "treaty"? It is exactly the same treaty we had our doubts many many turns ago - and we are 100% sure we are not going to sign it now, with our rather fine relations with both GoW and ND, sour relations with RPers and them being the most likely target of the next war,... so, what do we tell RPers and how?
There is one thing I should point out - the treaty only obliges both parties to declare war, not commit any troops, so once we pull this card, we should expect RPers to counter by agreeing to that we would not be expected to commit troops to help them, but at least to declare war (read: stop trading) on whoever might attack them. Which we do not wish to do either, but is more difficult to explain while sticking to a friendly note.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
OK, time to tell the RPers to stuff it.
Here is a draft of what I would like to PM them with:
quote: Your Majesty,
Honorable Ambassador,
The People of Spain,
Regretfully, we have to inform you that after thoroughly discussing and considering your defense pact proposal, we do not feel we are able to sign it while honoring its spirit. Other treaties we signed in the past prevent us from actually assisting you in a war conflict effectively.
Instead of signing a treaty that we would know would be nothing more than a hollow shell, we would rather not sign it at all and help you with whatever troubles you may encounter on a case by case basis.
With the best regards,
vondrack, the FAM of Legoland |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|