 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
Boris: I don't see the point of having Sole Valedictorianship at all. It's not as if it says more of her achievement. |
In a certain context, no, it doesn't say more. She should have been content to be a co-valedictorian and realize she is VERY fortunate to be going to Harvard.
However, put yourself in the position of a disabled person, perhaps not specifically her. You work your butt off in high school and have the best grades, hands-down. But when it comes time for graduating, you're told that you won't be sole valedictorian, but a co-valedictorian. This is because, through no fault of your own, your physical disability prevented you from taking the standard physical education course. Even though you took an alternative, the school says it doesn't count.
Frankly, I wouldn't blame the disabled person for being livid. Since there was no previous history of co-valedictorians, and it has always been given to one person, it certainly would smack of discrimination and being unfairly treated due to your disability. Being made to share the stage where none had to share before will also likely make many of those watching think that the disabled person is only up there because the school is throwing her a special diversity bone.
Now, the punitive suit this girl filed is an outrage. She got her way with the valedictorian issue, so her needing $2.7 million is ludicrous and a really stupid move by someone who thinks she's so smart.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
Perhaps if her disability could be confirmed, you would have an effective argument.
|
First, you'll note I was talking about a disabled person in general, in response to Az's general assertion about being valedictorian.
Second, if the school deemed the disability was enough to allow her an exemption from certain courses, such as phys ed, then what we think about it is therefore moot. If they didn't think it was valid, they shouldn't have granted the exemptions. And they certainly shouldn't have, once the exemptions were granted, backpedal come graduation and say her exeptions are going to penalize her status.
The court also seemed to think her disability was valid. Second-guessing it, out of ignorance, isn't really going to get anywhere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
No I wouldn't have any problem with it. Are co-Valedictorians less respected than sole ones? |
Again, were the situation to smack of being singled out for this kind of treatment due to your disability, I bet your attitude would change. As for being less respected, I covered that when I pointed out that many would think that, were she sharing the stage, that it maybe she didn't really deserve the honor, but was being given it due to her disability. I can't help but think that if a school told me I had to share an honor, whereas others before didn't, because of a physical disability, I'd be pretty peeved, no matter how significant the honor was.
If you're going to have a standard of co-valedictorians, fine. But to suddenly do it when a disabled student is concerned seems unfair to me. If they were going to exempt her from taking courses, then IMO they have to waive those courses when considering the valedictorianism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
(1) The girl's disease is bullshit
(2) The girl's claim for Valedictorian is bullshit
(3) The girl's $2.5mil is bullshit
(4) The girl's essays are bullshit
(5) This girl is full of bullshit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|