 |
|  |
 |
|
Starchild
|
 |
a raving alcoholic drama queen with a penchant for the biosciences
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
Cause it shows the culture can absorb changes and adapt. Deep fried battered fish was originally brought to the UK by Jewish migrants and now, as Fish and Chips, is one of the classic British stereotypes. Tikka Masala is undergoing the same transformation for "foreign" food to "British" food. The UK took in hip-hop and rap from America and has produced uniquely British versions (We love you Ms Dynamite!). The English language steals from other languages all the time and has become more diverse and beautiful for it.
British culture is a creation of the merging of Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Norman French, Anglo-Saxon, etc cultural influences. Why would adding Indian, East Asian, African, etc influences dilute British culture? It would just enrich it.
Your technological and cultural uniqueness will be added to our own. You will be assimiliated. Resistance is futile. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
Why not? I respect differences in other cultures, I enjoy them, and I celebrate them. I think that in this environment, different facets of culture can adopt each other, and an amalgam appears. The culture takes the differences, the good parts from each other, and produces a more diverse, more varied, and thus more dynmanic and enjoyable (for want of a better word) culture, thanks to intrigration, exposure to others etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
Then one has difference, which takes longer to assimilate, but it does. It takes time to integrate, and there are short-term difficulties, but with time the two cultures will adapt to one another, and merge into one. In the interim, if a culture has an element which runs contrary to another, as long as it is not illegal, then one can keep a degree of separation until they further adapt.
I am not suggesting apartheid or segregation based on those differences, but rather, one can have two distinct communities that interact, but not entirely. The interaction will increase with time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Then one has difference, which takes longer to assimilate, but it does. It takes time to integrate, and there are short-term difficulties, but with time the two cultures will adapt to one another, and merge into one. In the interim, if a culture has an element which runs contrary to another, as long as it is not illegal, then one can keep a degree of separation until they further adapt.
I am not suggesting apartheid or segregation based on those differences, but rather, one can have two distinct communities that interact, but not entirely. The interaction will increase with time. |
I just said it was a problem. Problems can be dealt with.
You mention assimilation. Well, some people don't want to assimilate. So what do you do with a group that 1) shares very different values, some of them directly opposed to the core values of your community; and 2) does not wish to assimilate?
I guess you wait 'em out, and get to their children via public education. 
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Why? Is there any rational reason for that, or is it merely based on prejudices.
|
Guess. 
My Alternative: get all the kids go to secular schools, that would teach them good values, like equality of chance, respect for other human beings, fraternity, striving for excellence, honesty, self-reliance, desire for success of the entire humanity, etc..
Persecute any people that would carry out actions that are against the law, but are the way according to their beliefs.
If parents insist on teaching their kids things that are obviously wrong, but part of their culture like "women should be subjegated", etc. steps will be taken to stop this.
Melting pot! With one culture, it's easier to all humans to connect between themselves as individuals.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Starchild
|
 |
a raving alcoholic drama queen with a penchant for the biosciences
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
I had a lovely post that the server ate...I'll try to remember most of it:
Western culture has a set of core values that is deeply seductive and appealing to aspects of the human condition. The adoption of these core values is part of the cultural contract between the already present Western culture and the arriving/emerging cultures. So appealing are these core values that cultural beliefs that disagree with them are often discarded, if not by the first generation than by the second, because such integration represents a better long term cultural adaptation than isolation does.
Liberty. Freedom. Democracy. The ability to think independently and speak one's own mind. Tolerance and equality. Whether you believe these values to be God-given or not (I go with not), they do form a common link tying together cultures.
However, I will admit I do worry at times about poor integration. It's easier in countries built on immigration, such as the USA and Canada. The basic idea is that you're trading one set of values for another when you move there. In European countries, there isn't the tradition of being seen as a nation built built from immigration. Sometimes, we should stress more that we have a set of core values that must be agreed to as part of the social-cultural contract. That applies to all citizens, whether racist BNP fascists or homophobic, anti-semetic Muslim extremists.
I regard your average British Muslim, moderate and tolerant, as more British than a BNP member. The BNP member has rejected the core values of society while the British Muslim has embraced them.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|