 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
Ah I see, Waldheim ended up as UN general secretary because of all his fellow nazis in, ia, the US and the USSR. You're such a bright bulb.
As for Haider, he'd be expelled from the Republican party as a whiny wet lefty on most issue.
Btw, Sound of Music makes a much better troll than the NSDAP as far as I'm concerned. Wanna try again? |
Come on, we know you Austrians desire "Zucht und Ordnung", "Oesterreich den Oesterreichern!", and "Auslaender raus!"
As for Waldheim, how should we know his past if you guys covered everything up? He seemed to be quite tame in the 70s.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
What's so bad about Zucht und Ordnung?
And we don't expel our Ausländer, we assimilate them. We naturalize them at a 30.000 to 40.000 rate per year, and turn them into ardent xenophobes by that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
" Enlighten me as to how that argument counters anything I said"
Hardly counts as contempt when someone prefers Saddam in Iraq than the Americans!! 
Nonetheless, the situation, I am told, is viewed as little different in Iraq as anti-Blair people view the current government here. Contempt, ridicule, unpopular (ok closer to conservative then... i dont know the opinion polls for blair, but if their anything like my mind, its not good for our favourite 50 year old), runs wild, but generally, not enough to make the people rise up in a number of years. I believe that before the war, Saddam was laying off with the oppression somewhat, so if the people were going to rise up, just before the war was the best opportunity. Didnt happen.
"As for your last bit, I would agree wholeheartedly if the US had any intention of ruling Iraq for the long term"
Very true, I doubt the US will stay in there more than a year, whether they garrison it is a different matter, though with Iran, I would imagine that they would. Nonetheless, the question is whether the US will have any signigicant power of the Iraqi government. My betting is that the governmental puppet show is about to get a brand new actor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
They haven't even attacked the DIA, the neocon intelligence fiefdom that has grown so much and is somewhat independent from the rest of the intelligence bureaucracy.
|
They haven't?
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/30/o...Ed%2fColumnists
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Victor Galis
|
 |
in exile
Jul 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
Not true. Winning the electoral votes in a state is generally an all-or-nothing affair (there have been very few exceptions to this rule), so if one candidate wins 100% of the vote in the states representing 49% of the electoral college, while the other candidate wins 51% of the votes in the states representing 51% of the electoral college, then the latter candidate wins despite only winning approximately 25% of the popular vote. This is intended to reduce the effects of regional voting. For example, Lincoln was not even put on the Southern ballots in (IIRC) the 1860 election, but he still won the majority of votes in the Northern states, resulting in his winning a majority of the electoral votes despite only winning approximately 40% of the popular vote. That
s why there's an electoral college -- it puts a cap on the effect that any single state/region can exert on the election process. |
-What you're saying is true, but it does not in any way contradict my statement. Right now, each state has a number of representatives directly proportional to its population; however, the number of Electoral votes is equal to 2 + its number of representatives. This gives small states an unfair advantage in violation of the "one man, one vote" doctrine. If you reduced each states' number of electoral votes by 2, Bush's 271-266 victory becomes a 213-224 loss. He won more small states and thus benefited disproportionately from this skew in the way electoral votes are assigned.
edit: fixed my numbers which were slightly off. Had forgot to account that one of Gore's electors abstained and randomly gave Bush two too many votes.
Last edited by Victor Galis on 01-06-2003 at 05:39
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
I'm just surprised that everybody's still harping on our last major forgery. Watergate was decades ago, people! Let it go! |
You've missed the Florida farce, then.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
What's so bad about Zucht und Ordnung?
And we don't expel our Ausländer, we assimilate them. We naturalize them at a 30.000 to 40.000 rate per year, and turn them into ardent xenophobes by that. |
Did I say that was bad? I just want to remind you that "Zucht und Ordnung" are not what leftists and liberals stand for. If you really love these concepts, think twice before throwing in the same lot with lefists.
If what you say about immigration is true, I think Austria is doing a better job than Germany here.
Germany is taking many Muslims in every year and turn them into ardent anti-westerners. How sad.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kirnwaffen
|
 |
Tryin' hard to chill in the city of Dis
Jul 2000 time: 22:28
|
|
quote: Hardly counts as contempt when someone prefers Saddam in Iraq than the Americans |
Prefering one thing over another doesn't necessarily mean you don't find both contemptible.
And no, the situation under Saddam was in no way comparable to the political situation in the UK. In the UK, you can actually express your contempt, ridicule, etc. without being imprisoned, killed, or worse.
quote: I believe that before the war, Saddam was laying off with the oppression somewhat |
That makes it all better. Even if he was (and I seriously doubt he was), how does that change anything? You think a revolt would have been crushed any less brutally?
As for installing a puppet government in Iraq, I think the US would have a difficult time. The Iraqi people aren't stupid, nor are they as apathetic as the Americans. They'll recognize American puppetry if they see it, and elect a new government. If the US tries to interfere, I think there will be serious hell to pay.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Merciless
Did I say that was bad? I just want to remind you that "Zucht und Ordnung" are not what leftists and liberals stand for. If you really love these concepts, think twice before throwing in the same lot with lefists.
|
Leftists? Contempt for Bush and his ilk is absolutely mainstream here, and we're a very conservative country.
"Germany is taking many Muslims in every year and turn them into ardent anti-westerners. How sad."
About 1 % of muslims in Germany qualifies as radical fundamentalists. Nobody knows what that figure is for America, as you prefer to ignore the problem.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
"Prefering one thing over another doesn't necessarily mean you don't find both contemptible"
Perhaps, but degrees of contempt.
"And no, the situation under Saddam was in no way comparable to the political situation in the UK. In the UK, you can actually express your contempt, ridicule, etc. without being imprisoned, killed, or worse"
In terms of what people think of him, it is comparable. The actual mechanics of the policies is a completely different matter.
"You think a revolt would have been crushed any less brutally?"
He was tolerating a slightly larger degree of dissent than previously when he was younger. It is a possible explanation for why the Iraqi people havent rose up against Saddam for years. Another reason was the fear after the previous ones failed when the Americans refused to help after the gulf war I, which would seem to indicate that concern for Iraqi people doesnt exactly rank particularly highly. A convenient, emotive excuse for a people whose government has blinded them by the flag.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
Leftists? Contempt for Bush and his ilk is absolutely mainstream here, and we're a very conservative country.
"Germany is taking many Muslims in every year and turn them into ardent anti-westerners. How sad."
About 1 % of muslims in Germany qualifies as radical fundamentalists. Nobody knows what that figure is for America, as you prefer to ignore the problem. |
Anyway, opinions in your tiny mountain hinterland matter little.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Merciless
Anyway, opinions in your tiny mountain hinterland matter little. |
We prefer the term "Arschland". Please comply.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|