 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO1003
Every innocent bystander is a future militant Israeli settler. |
Nah.. most Israelis will become well-educated, well-dressed, well-behaving, egoistical gentlemen (/ ladies), too busy with their carreers for burning olive trees for sports.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO1003
Al'Kimiya, you have hit on the second root problem. The economic disparity between the average Israeli and the average Palestinian must be addressed. Millions in aid have been sent to the Palestinians over the years but sadly, little has found its way to the people. |
Any true peace proposal should adress this point, and direct funds to prevent overbreeding.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Yip, great way to encourage Hamas to a cease-fire, try to kill their spokesman.....very smart....yup, brilliant...obviosuly both sides want peace.... |
Hamas has already publicly stated that they will never enter a cease fire. And if Israel doesn't attack Hamas despite attacks to it, what would be the motivation to enter a ceasefire in which Israel doesn't attack Hamas, but Hamas must not attack either? Seems like Hamas would have no gain by entering such a cease fire.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Freedom for Palestine!
Destroy Israel-Turkey alliance!
Support the Indifada!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Hamas has eneterd cease-fires in the past. So much for never.
|
No, they haven't. The only cease fire they've talked about is stopping to kill civilians in Israel proper (but not civilins outside Israel proper, or military inside or outside Israel proper) if Israel stops any attacks against any Palestinians - civilian or terrorist in or out of the territories. That is not a cease fire and it never even happened, so the point is mute, anyway.
quote:
As for Israel attacking Hamas: shooting missiles into cars on the street in one of the most densely populated spots on earth is not the only way to combat Hamas. |
Have a better method for killing the #2 man of Hamas?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Nice pof of "bystander"..I hope you are not one of those that feels Pals are never bystanders.
|
I'm not saying they're not innocent civilians (although one of the bystandards was a Hamas bodyguard...), I'm stating that they're being used as human sheilds by the terrorists. The Geneva convention does not give immunity to terrorists simply because they're hiding behind someone - the death of that person is the responsibility of the terrorist.
quote:
Second, if other state conduct raids for wanted me, so can Israel. |
Like Somalia? 
Last edited by Edan on 10-06-2003 at 21:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Seeker
|
 |
London Ontario
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
Hamas is the most active and visible.
Getting rid of them would send a message that a minority of wackos don't represent the palestianian people.
It depends on what you mean by 'membership' in Hamas.
The criminal aspect of Hamas is the indoctrination, organizing, and carrying out of murder. That's what needs to be cut out. If a soup kitchen type guy is indoctrinating people (do an op, be a martyr, your family will be secure and you'll be a hero), then yeah of course he should go he's a terrorist.
If he isn't indoctrinating he is has nothing to worry about.
Families: a toughy. The long-term destructiveness of Hamas makes me think any sacrifice is acceptable. Young kids should, of course, try to be protected and made wards of the state or adopted. Same with other non-terrorist family members if any. But anyone who gets in the way of the buttonmen is a combattant, same as on the battlefield. After all, if a Hitler Youth is about to kill you, who cares how old he is?
These terrorist groups have always hid behind the innocent. Isn't it time to give up the conciliatory, deal-making approach that has worked so well with them in the past?
Note that 'them' refers to the militant push the jews into the sea groups not the palestinian people who've been crushed and buggered by both Israel and their 'Liberation' groups.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Its hard not be be next to civiians, when you live in one of the most densely populated spots on earth. |
Well, if it's so densly populated that you're always going to be next to civilians, any firefight that happens (and if you go in to arrest a top leader, there undoubtably will be a firefight), there will be many killed.
quote:
Yes, exactly like Somalia, and if it had not been screwed up, no one would have died. And even if people do die, too bad, they were doing the right thing. |
So it's better to kill more than a thousand bystandards than to kill 2?
Want to explain that to me? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
5 rockets were fired on the town of Sderot, 4 Israelis were lightly wounded, Israeli helicopters supposedly located the car which the shooters used to escape and bombed it. 4 dead Pals.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Edan
Well, if it's so densly populated that you're always going to be next to civilians, any firefight that happens (and if you go in to arrest a top leader, there undoubtably will be a firefight), there will be many killed.
So it's better to kill more than a thousand bystandards than to kill 2?
Want to explain that to me? |
The only reason that many people died is becuase the US screwed up. If Israel screws up, then they screw up. The possibility of danger does not mean that they should shrink form their duty. Oh, and the IDF could not care much if many Pals died (as their operations show), they just don;t want to risk personel, which is the wrong attitude. You do what is right, period.
And if you think it is too dangerous to attack, then you hold off. I guess things like a fair trial and such don;t matter for Pals, right?

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
The only reason that many people died is becuase the US screwed up. If Israel screws up, then they screw up. The possibility of danger does not mean that they should shrink form their duty. Oh, and the IDF could not care much if many Pals died (as their operations show), they just don;t want to risk personel, which is the wrong attitude. You do what is right, period.
[/qb] |
If Israel didn't care how many Palestinians die, they could wipe the lot in a month if they wanted to. They certainly have the capability.
Instead, they do everything they can that is practical to minimize civilian casualties. That is why the number of civilian casualties are so low - and they are low, just compare it with the death tolls in Iraq in one month of warfare - despite the use of civilians as shields by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Fatah, etc.
Taking your chosen action - going in to arrest the leader - even though you know it will inevitably cause more civilian deaths is irresponsible because it is easily predictable that it wil cause far far[i] more deaths.
quote:
And if you think it is too dangerous to attack, then you hold off.
|
Sometimes it's too dangerous [i]not to act. And if Israel were to wait until arresting/killing the terrorist would have no chance of harming civilians, they would end up never doing so because those terrorists intentionally hide amoung the civilians [i]in order[i] to make sure that any attack on them will risk civilians. As
quote:
I guess things like a fair trial and such don;t matter for Pals, right?
|
Oh please Perhaps we shouldn't have sent in the military into Iraq and Afghanistan, but policemen with warrants? 
There is a time and place for trials. And there is a time and place for killing because you know that the individual wont go quietly - and will cause firefights and death - and will do as much as he can to cause more civilian deaths unless he is stopped.
Last edited by Edan on 10-06-2003 at 23:14
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
I was agains the war in Iraq, so that hardly works with me, and as for Afghanistan, you expect more deaths, given the far greater level of violence being used.
Israel fails in this attack, but Hamas will react. if Israel had succeeded, Hamas would react. So how does this help anything? It satisfies the urge for vengence of a large number of people, but beyond that, nothing, and it is hardly the type of justice that a state that consides itself democratic.
To make it short and sweet: Israel assasination policy runs counter to democratic values, HR's, and is in the end counterproductive to boot. There is nothing calling for it, except eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth; an outmoded principle that should be gotten rid of as soon as possible.
Today all israel achieved was keeping things bad, and if it had worked, making them worse. Wow, what a wonderfull job!

|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|