 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
there are more Palestinian people that want Israel smited from the planet than there are Israeli hawks.
|
I wonder why... For some reason it doesn't surprise me. I'll let y'all guess why. A couple of words that start with O.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:28
|
|
The thing is, that some people can't understand the political terms of Israelis. Here, "hardliner" means more or less "lunatic redneck warnik" and normal people are, in respects to War and Peace at least, is a sane-moderate right wing warnik. Like your average baptist redneck I met at Jax... Extreme left is more or less like centrist in the US... Ultra-Super-extreme left (a bit to the right of me) is often like US liberals.
And there are those who don't give a **** and go to be common infantry and get punished by the commander when they tell him he shouldn't have beat up that Pal kid with his gun for nothing (true story)
So let's see... What did we say about the population and what it wants?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
Bah.
Firelad - in what brigade was that? (givaty, paratroops, golany, mech-inf?) Did the soldier protest to the superior officers?
I'm sorry, but if an intelligence officer could easily protest when he thought that intelligence he would provide can lead to unnecessary deaths, why can't a soldier protest as well? Call the press? Make some noise?
I'm all for punishing the heck out of such beasts, like the reported commanding officer. I'm also pretty sure that if some refusinks were there, serving, they wold have stuck up to the guy, and maybe let the press in on it.
Instead, they sit at home or in jail, whining about acts they can't prove, since they hardly were at the scene.
It is exactly because peace loving people refuse to go to the army, that there are many such cases that are hushed up. Obviously if all peace-loving people refuse to serve, the only ones left to serve will be socio-paths.
And as for the assassination today - some people say that Israel is evil because it wanted to stop the cease fire between Hamas and Israel.
First point - such a cease fire is not an equal one and never really held up (as Edan mentioned earlier)
Second point - there is absolutely no sense in a cease fire with Hamas, when it admits that even a "cease fire" will be only tactical, temporary and will never lead to the eventual demilitarization.
And if anyone thinks that this "cease fire" would not play into Hamas hands, then he's delusional. This would give them time to restore operative network and command chain, and supplies. Then 6 months later, when ever they want - they can fight Israel, this time with even greater success.
Abu Mazen himself said that contrary to what's demanded of him in the Road Map, he has no intentions of fighting against Hamas or dismantling it. Contrary to specific demands made by the Americans, Abu Mazen wanted to convince Hamas to declare a cease fire with Israel.
Such a cease fire is called a "Hudna". This is a historical and religious term relating to a temporary, tactical cease fire that muslims make when fighting non-muslims, in order to gather strength, and in preperation for a future decisive attack.
This is in no way a meaningfull cease fire. Neither in it's intentions (better position in future conflict) nor in it's implementation (Hamas still gets to target Israeli military targets, as well as civilian targets in the disputed territories).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
And yet they killed 5 by-standers and injured 80. |
Uhh, no. Two bystandards - including one of Rantisi's bodyguards - were killed and twenty seven were injured.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
Yes, semantics. Given the fact we communicate with words, semantic matter.
I never said Israel refused a ceasefire:
quote: Oh, to clafiry Israel never made any offer of a cease-fire. The ceasefire negotiations have all been between Palestinains factions, ussually with Eygptian moderation. So, again, the Israeli government has made no offers of a ceasefire whatsoever: their line is that Abbas must crack down on militants, or they will. That does not douns like some ceasefire offer. |
Notice how in your very own headline it says:
quote: thought it wants palestinians officials to disarm and disband the groups as soon as possible |
What your piece says is if the militants agree to cut violence, then Israel for its part will too (so impetus, as i have said, lies with the pals) but it still wants a crackdown (disarming and disbanning) by Abbas.
Where I was wrong is whatsoever. Sp I will change it to:
"Israel has made no ceasefire offers of its own, but will honor what Pals decide among themselves".
Is that better for you?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|