 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
I would gladly explain to you for the millionth time why Greece is a lost case of a country but I do not want to threadjack this thread.
And was Echtelion banned for mocking panag here or not?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
Same old, same old. Sad really, but redictable..damn predictable.
Yes, terrorist atatcks have gone down since the IDF cracked down..not sh1t sherlock, have tanks in every intersection and you make it harder to move. BUt while it makes it rarer, it doesn;t stop it, now has it?
But the fact is that all the military action in the world won;t make it stop. Nothing short of genocide on the Israeli side (the only side capable of it resourceswise) would "win" this, though of course such an act would lead to the end of Israel itself. basically a no win situation.
As for Hamas: they are more than a militant org, they are a political movement. Political movements must be discredited in the eys of the people to be destroyed, and most of what Israel does only increases the credit the average Palestinains gives Hamas. And vice versa, every act of the Palestinian extremists increases the credit the average Israeli gives the hardliners. Wondefull, nice circular pattern that will continue for many years, as long as both sides continue to hold on to their cheerished victimization.
Do we want to say a few words for the countless more victims that are to follow today?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
Someone up there starts to like Helicopters...
Another assasination in the Gaza Strip. I'm not sure who's the target yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
Earlier today Hamas declared that the Jerusalem attack was only the first in a wave of attacks(reasonable, since 20 bombers were caught in the last month alone, 1 today) and that Sharon is now a target.
Israel made 4-5 assasinations in the past two days alone.
Hmmm.... The conspirator in me thinks that if Israel destroys Hamas' leadership, the Peace process and Abu Mazen will have a lot to gain.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Same old, same old. Sad really, but redictable..damn predictable.
Yes, terrorist atatcks have gone down since the IDF cracked down..not sh1t sherlock, have tanks in every intersection and you make it harder to move. BUt while it makes it rarer, it doesn;t stop it, now has it?
But the fact is that all the military action in the world won;t make it stop. Nothing short of genocide on the Israeli side (the only side capable of it resourceswise) would "win" this, though of course such an act would lead to the end of Israel itself. basically a no win situation.
? |
yes of course a political solution is rwquired. teh question is whether or not military strikes on hamas increase or decrease the likelihood off a political solution.
On the one hand Hamas is the principle opponent of a political solution, and by commiting acts of terror makes it close to impossible for an Israeli government to take steps that lessen Israels physical security - yet it is precisely such steps that are required for a political solution - so you destroy the leadership of hamas, and then talk with Abbas, without the obstacle of hamas.
The counter to this is that since Abbas is seen as conciliating israel, and the israeli attacks are very unpopular on the pal street, since they unintentionally kill civilians, Abbas is undermined.
It therefore would seem that actions must be undertaken on a case by case basis - how important is the hamas leader you are trying to kill - are you sure you can get him - how many civilians are likely to be unintentionally killed - and how much terror have you prevented by taking out any given leader.
If you think (as Abbas seems to claim) that Hamas was on the point of signing a ceasefire, then the cost benefit doesnt look good at all. OTOH if you have intell, as Israel claims to, that Hamas was on the point of a series of attacks planned by Rantissi, then attacking him may actually improve the chances of a political settlement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
An Israeli was killed in a shooting terract in northern Samaria.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
As for Hamas: they are more than a militant org, they are a political movement. Political movements must be discredited in the eys of the people to be destroyed, and most of what Israel does only increases the credit the average Palestinains gives Hamas. And vice versa, every act of the Palestinian extremists increases the credit the average Israeli gives the hardliners. Wondefull, nice circular pattern that will continue for many years, as long as both sides continue to hold on to their cheerished victimization.
? |
Its hard to see how the act of killing a hamas leader increases the credit given to hamas. Rather its the collateral damage to civilians, and actions such as curfews, blockades etc.
Therefore the correct strategy is to maximize damage to Hamas, while minimizing civilian casuaties, and meanwhile pursuing the peace process so that real improvements can be made to the lives of pals, and they can see israel is serious about political concessions.
RE cycle - no circular pattern this week.
Israels attack on Rantissi followed an attack on by hamas, IJ, and AAMB on an israeli military base.
did that attack follow an israeli attack - no.
It followed a summit meeting designed to kick start the peace process.
Hamas did not attack in response to an israeli attack, but in response to movement toward peace. Which it has done in the past as well. which tends to make the israeli population skittish about every move toward peace. Peace can only move ahead when the Israeli population sees that such movement is not inconsistent with its own security - and pie in the sky promises of security down the road when the conflict ends will not cut it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
i bet mucex would have shot rabin given the chance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|