 |
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: The terrorists will claim that they were the ones that got Israel to withdraw. |
Yeah, so? Then they'll have to deal with statehood and not just try to get a state. A lot of their support for further attacks will be lessened because the people will ask for more services.
quote: Except Abbas doesn't have any power now since Arafat is the one guiding all his actions. |
If you actually have a state with real elections (which can be demanded in a peace settlement and gotten with little hassle), then Abbas WILL have power, if he wins.
quote: Except that if that happens - and I'm fairly confident it will - we'll just end up back here, except under worse conditions. |
I doubt that. It'll be a better situation in that case, IMO. You could do kinda what the US is trying in Iraq. Israel doesn't want to get involved in the creation of a Palestinian democracy, so naturally it won't happen unless there is external prodding (like Bush did to get Abbas in power). |
hi ,
imran , with all do respect but thats bull , .....
why on earth do you think that we continue to sit on the table trying to work out peace , why do you think we give them money and support for the PA , .....
if we really would not want a pal democrazy then we would not even bother , .....
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: if we really would not want a pal democrazy then we would not even bother |
If you really wanted a Palestinian democracy, you would have installed it as well as improved the infrastructure when you had actual control over the area. Instead you brought Arafat from Tunesia and negotiated with him.
You don't CARE about a Palestinian democracy. If Abbas turned into a dictator but stopped the bombings, you'd be perfectly content!
quote: Ignore the killings? Are you serious? We are talking about innocent lives being lost!
Israel should just sit back and allow dozens of innocent life to be murdered, and do nothing???? How can you say such a thing? |
What about the other side. You can't say that Palestinians haven't died either. They have to ignore the killing as well. And that is the only way to true peace, when both sides ignore the loonies and try to get together to make it work and then join together AGAINST the loonies! |
hi ,
we cant install anything , they have to do so , we can build the buildings for them , give them comps , paper , money , guns ( they shoot at us with them ) a library with all the constitutions of the world ( done that ! ) but they have to do it , they have to build the country , ..... and that goes for any nation , you cant "install" , .....
and if would not care we would not even have given the guns from the oslo deal , the ones they now use to shoot at us , ....
so please , dont say that we dont care , .....
or what do you think i do then in brussels or at any other meeting all over the world , ......
or what do you think the other people in wash ny and bxl do , ..... we try to get a solid peace , ....
so please don,t say we dont care cause thats a plain simple outright lie , ......
and if you would know one or two things , we dont remove arafat , thats up to the palestinians , ..... your statement draws against your previous one , .....
we dont install or remove people like that , it oes not work , not in Israel , not in Greece , spain , the us , not on any other single country of this world , ......
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
I SAID BOTH SIDES! Hamas continues to do its thing. The IDF continues to do its thing.
Meanwhile, Sharon & Abbas negotiate a settlement, and shut their traps about the killing by both sides.
-Arrian |
hi ,
what thing we do , ..... what , .......????
none , because if we really where to do our thing as you call it then everything would be finished within three months , .....
we behave and act nice , we are the ones that hand out our hand , and who spits on that hand , ......
thats the fact , ....
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: If you really wanted a Palestinian democracy, you would have installed it as well as improved the infrastructure when you had actual control over the area. Instead you brought Arafat from Tunesia and negotiated with him.
You don't CARE about a Palestinian democracy. If Abbas turned into a dictator but stopped the bombings, you'd be perfectly content!
|
I admit, we were wrong.
It was wrong to bring Arafat.
Israel really did think that as a dictator, Arafat will be better equipped to stop terrorism, than IDF, since IDF actions are governed by government, parliament and the supreme court, which is open to palesatinian plaints since they are under our occupation.
btw, I use the word occupation in regards to the population. I have no doubt that the palestinian population is occupied.
I don't think of the territories as occupied. While Israel 'occupies' a good portion of them (as in 'is the active ruler of those lands'), I think that they are disputed and not clearly palestinian. This is because there were no Palestinian claims to the West Bank and Gaza, when they were controlled by Arab countries (pre-1967).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Israel really did think that as a dictator, Arafat will be better equipped to stop terrorism, than IDF, since IDF actions are governed by government, parliament and the supreme court, which is open to palesatinian plaints since they are under our occupation. |
This is why I think that Isreal doesn't care if there is a dictatorship in Palestine, as long as it is beneficial to them. IMO, you could have stopped this by building up Palestine when you got it, and help the people out of their refugee camps and build a democracy. YES, it might have costed a lot of money, but a lot more has been spent the long run.
You must admit, your rule hasn't always been nice.
These days, it is hard to go back, but you have to plunge ahead and ignore the idiots, until you can join together to do something about it. Hamas won't be beaten until BOTH the IDF and Palestinian forces work together to eliminate them... but that requires peace.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
panag,
What I mean is this: in order for peace to be possible, both sides must keep negotiating no matter what happens. No matter how horrible a terract may occur. No matter how many bystanders get blown to pieces by an Israeli helicopter, the leadership of both sides should continue to talk peace.
In the past, after a period of violence, one side or the other would back out, using the violence done by the other side as an excuse.
That's what I'm talking about. I'm not saying that Israel is the "bad guy" here.
-Arrian |
hi ,
read the roadmap thread btw , ......
look , we are trying to sit on the table , and at least we kicked everyone out because both parties feel that outside involment mainly from the eu and russia is causing us more problems then anything else , ...
we dont walk out of a meeting room or walk in one with a hamas pin as some of the pals bodyguards do , .....
why do you think some palestinians peace "dealers" are protected by the Israelis , .....
if there is one thing that Sharon has had on his mind since lets say 1972 then its peace , .....
and we have been doing so since the start of the Sharon gov , in secret but we have been doing so , we want peace , for both people , .....
and that is not my own personal view but the view luckely of most idf officers and mfa and other gov people , even the ultra orhodox in my office want peace , ..... even the druze and the kopt !
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
quote: This is why I think that Isreal doesn't care if there is a dictatorship in Palestine, as long as it is beneficial to them. IMO, you could have stopped this by building up Palestine when you got it, and help the people out of their refugee camps and build a democracy. YES, it might have costed a lot of money, but a lot more has been spent the long run.
|
When, in the 60s? you realize that Arafat would be in an autonomous palestine in 2 seconds.
Besides, where would we get the money? |
hi ,
like we dont give the allready plenty , .....
what do they ( the PA ) do with the 14 million each month then from the eu , what with the monthly 80 millions do they do , .....
answer , they put it in bank accounts at bank halopim , in brazil , russia , belgium , swiss , egypt , saudi , etc , .....
everytime we have surrounded arafats compound we had to pay for the food we gave them , the spare cell phone batteries , do you think they have ever gave us a thank you , ......
or do you think anyone reads or looks at those pics in the press , .....
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The diplomat
|
 |
Terre Haute, IN USA
Sep 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
Look, all I'm saying is that the violence is used to halt negotiations. The only way negotiations can succeed is if the negotiators ignore the violence.
-Arrian |
If the terrorism is halting the negotiations, then why not get rid of the terrorism before you negotiate?
If a marathon runner has a piece of glass cutting into his foot, does he continue to run anyway, or does he remove the piece of glass first before continuying the race? So, it just seems to me that the logical thing to do, since the terrorism has costs so many lives and derailed the negotiations over and over again, is to first remove the terrorism rather than continue negotiations that you know are going to be derailed by violence.
So, why not attack all out against the Palestinian terrorist groups until they surrender, then you can negotiate free of terrorism? Isn't that what the US is doing against Al Queda?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: If the terrorism is halting the negotiations, then why not get rid of the terrorism before you negotiate? |

Because you can't. You can fire as many missles as you want, and the terrorists won't stop. What the hell do you think Israel has been trying to do? Has it worked? No, it hasn't. They've nailed a bunch of terrorist leaders, foiled attacks, and so on and so forth, but the terrorists just keep on coming. The best way to stop them is to undercut their recruitment. A peace deal will do that. The hardcore crazies will keep fighting, of course, because they want Israel destroyed utterly, but there simply isn't much anyone can do about that. Mossad & the Palestinian Security forces will have to learn to work together to stop them.
Further, I didn't say that the violence was stopping negotiations. I said that the violence was used by one side or the other as an excuse to back out of peace talks.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian

Because you can't. You can fire as many missles as you want, and the terrorists won't stop. What the hell do you think Israel has been trying to do? Has it worked? No, it hasn't. They've nailed a bunch of terrorist leaders, foiled attacks, and so on and so forth, but the terrorists just keep on coming. The best way to stop them is to undercut their recruitment. A peace deal will do that. The hardcore crazies will keep fighting, of course, because they want Israel destroyed utterly, but there simply isn't much anyone can do about that. Mossad & the Palestinian Security forces will have to learn to work together to stop them.
Further, I didn't say that the violence was stopping negotiations. I said that the violence was used by one side or the other as an excuse to back out of peace talks.
-Arrian |
actually there was considerably less terrorism after the Israelis went back into the West bank and cracked down, then in the period before - april of 2002. it turns out that killing leaders, destroying bomb factories etc does make a difference. Im not saying its a long term solution, but as a way of clearing the ground for real negotiations it may be necessary - the reflexive view that it never works is just that, reflexive.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|