 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Templar
|
 |
People's Republic of the East Village
Oct 2001 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saras
On the job safety can be agreed via negotiations, by either individual or union, no need for the Govt. to enforce. |

How 19th century!
Anyway, if this can be contracted then how come only the emergence of regulations (including OSHA) lead to the significantly safer workplaces we enjoy today? Historical fact runs against your supposition.
quote: Pollution, OTOH, may be regulated, but is best (theoretically) addressed via trading pollution permits, i.e., internalizing the pollution externality. I admit there are implementation issues, but that's another topic. |
Yep, that would be one form of government regulation. Because if the government doesn't back those permits, by stopping overpolluters, those permits won't be worth the paper they are printed on. It's kind of like if you have a property deed and the government chooses not to recognize it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Templar
Ned
You miss my point, the Ayatollah's popularity was a direct consequence of the Shah. We supported the Shah, so the people of Iran didn't much like us either. We created the Ayatollah.
Oh, and Carter launched a military operation to save the hostages. The military promptly ****ed it up. What did Reagan do? Oh yeah, he cut a deal - what a toughie. You see Carter knew when to be tough and when to negotiate.
Also, Japan was heavily unionized and was kicking our asses.
Now I will admit that Reagan did alot to inspire confidence. Then again, i think anyone who wasn't Carter or Ford could have done that job. |
The Templar, the Shah was extremely unpopular among the religious extremists in Iran because of his introduction of liberal culture into a very conservative society. He was trying to make Iran more like the United States. It was natural that the religious extremists blamed the introduction of liberal cultural on America. Across the world of extreme Islam, America is the great Satan not because of our military power but because of our "decadent" culture.
Of course none of this at anything to do with a particular president, whether the Nixon, Ford or Carter. But I recall at the time that when the Shah was ousted in favor of a moderate democratic successor government, the Ayatollah was not satisfied and wanted direct religious control, Carter did nothing to support that régime against the Ayatollah Khomeini. Whether the régime could have withstood the Ayatollah if we would have supported it is an interesting question itself. But we did nothing.
Certainly this weakness in supporting allies began with our failure to support Vietnam in 1975. I recall at the time that Kissinger is very bitter about our failure to act in support of the democratic régime in Iran. As a result, we were losing allies across the globe. We lost Vietnam. We lost Iran. America's enemies were on the march.
Ronald Reagan reversed all that. He also reversed the decline in the economy and brought inflation under control. He began the longest period of sustained economic growth in US history.
As to reversing the New Deal, what are you talking about? The New Deal was about Social Security and regulation of the banking and securities industries. Reagan did nothing about Social Security. Surely you are not complaining about removing some of the unnecessary regulation of the savings-and-loan and banking industries? This de-regulation has been part and parcel of our economic growth the past 20 years.
As to Reagan cutting a deal to get the hostages back where Carter could not, what deal you talking about? I believe the Ayatollah released hostages as a gesture of goodwill to a new US President. But his particular intent was to further humiliate Carter.
As of this moment, I do not recall what Reagan had to say about the hostages during election campaign. Does anyone here know what Reagan's position was on Iran and the hostages?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
under Clinton, things got better, |
Wasn't it because Republicans had the majority in the congress and controlled him?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|