 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
we don't need an economic genius here, we need someone who will not get pushed around or sit on their hands. |
Actually, you need both, and someone with in-depth knowledge of public finance law and the mechanics of the state bureacracy. Running California is not like running any other state - there is a huge amount of money, huge number of employees, and a large number of nominally subordinate empires (the state special purpose agencies) which are primarily non-general fund financed, and which have relatively little accountability to the governor.
Economics and finance knowledge are essential, because there are a number of valid structural reasons that state services costs more to deliver in California compared to other states, but, there is also a huge amount of money lost to fluff, empire games, and relatively poor accountability.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
This could be a real catastrophe for the Republicans. if they run multiple candidates and the Dems run just one. Assume the Dem got 40% of the vote and 4 Republicans split 60%!
In order to make sense out of this, the Republicans need to select just one candidate. |
Naah. Cali's so solidly democratic, and the state Republican Party is so broke, that they're not going to back anyone to take over as governor in a disaster. Think about it - the other seven elected state officers are all Dems, as are solid majorities in both legislative houses. There's nothing to gain for the Reps, because even if the mess gets fixed under a new Dem governor, they can still blame the Dems for causing a mess in the first place. 
The party is too broke for a governorship to be a steppingstone to the Senate. Feinstein isn't challengeable, and the national party won't subsidize a campaign against Boxer, because she's a great ally for the Republican cause, and Cali campaigning is too damn expensive. If you're on the RNC, the choice between throwing a ton of money into Cali to try and unseat Boxer, or throwing that money into 3-4 small state races for Senate is an easy one.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|