 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by finbar
Just for the RWC. In order to satisfy the official sponsors of the World Cup, the IRB required that all ground ad signage - and jersey ad logos - be removed for the duration of the tournament so that the official sponsors wouldn't have any advertising competition.
This is what led to New Zealand losing the co-hosting role. The NZRFU, in its wisdom, refused to agree to remove the ad signage at their grounds. They decided, in their wisdom, that the ad revenue their clubs received from their signage was far more beneficial than the multi-millions the RWC would bring. They even went as far as to say that the NPC was more important to Kiwis than the RWC anyway. |
How ridiculous!
quote:
Thus, as soon as the NZRFU lost the co-hosting gig, a broom was put through the NZRFU hierarchy and some people with brains were installed in place of the idiots. Just a bit too late, unfortunately. |
I wonder who's in line to host the next few RWCs? Hopefully New Zealand will get a another chance at some point.
quote:
On another, brighter note. I've just looked at the schedule for tomorrow, Saturday and Sunday. Tomorrow night, of course, I have Australia -v- Argentina to watch. On Saturday, I have NZ -v- Italy at 2pm, followed by France -v- Fiji at 7.30pm, followed by South Africa -v- Uruguay at 10pm. With highlights of Ireland -v- Romania on another channel at 9.30pm.
On Sunday, I have to make do with Scotland -v- Japan at 8.30pm, England -v- Georgia at 10pm, and the highlights of Wales -v- Canada at midnight.
You will, no doubt, understand why I've instructed Mrs finbar not to agree to any social engagements for the next month or so. Well, to be truthful, I told her she could, on her behalf, but that she should tell everyone I was unavailable on account of I'd died suddenly. |
...and gone to heaven.
The RWC doesn't start till Monday evening for me, thanks to the delayed broadcast. It beats paying 20 bucks at the door to see it live at a pub though.
After tomorrow I'll have to make myself scarce around here...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
Caligastia said he would be avoiding the thread for a while right - so we can talk about the game when the final whistle has gone?? |
Abso-bloody-lutely!
quote: *edit* Finbar, forgetting the score for now a friend phoned me to say the injury to Giffen looked very serious indeed - and that he hasn;t regained consciousness.
I hope this is wrong - and my thoughts are with his family if it is.
This can be a dangerous game - and necks are not desinged for landing on. |
Landed on the side of his head and his shoulder. He was unconscious on the field. Didn't even twitch. The first diagnosis - after he'd left the field - was severe concussion. I haven't heard any more.
Wallabies 24 -d- Argentina 8
Mmmm. Talk about a curate's egg of a performance. The very good things:
1. Larkham absolutely back to doing what he does best. Ghosting, slipping through gaps that don't seem to be there, setting up the backline;
2. David Lyons' powerhouse effort at #8, making tons of ground with the ball, taking a couple of tacklers with him each time. Quieter in the second half, but finished the game strongly;
3. Al Baxter's first start at tighthead was terrific against very big, strong opposition. I think we've found ourselves a tighthead with a real future;
4. The forwards, over all, performed well against big, strong opposition. Even won one against the feed;
5. The backline finally got seriously involved - Rogers, Sailor, Roff, and even Matt Burke finally looked threatening.
The bad things:
1. Sixteen handling errors! A lot of them in attacking positions with tries beckoning;
2. A lacklustre first 30 minutes of the second half, in which the Wallabies seemed to coast. They ended the first half with a massive possession and territory advantage, and let the Pumas even up the stats with 10 minutes to go. They were patently obviously superior, but seemed incapable of putting their stamp on the game. They got away with it tonight, they won't against the better teams.
For the most part, the Pumas, unfortunately, verged on incompetent. Their hooker was pinged at least half a dozen times for crooked throws to the lineout, they showed absolutely no rhythm or coordination, and their kicker missed (from memory) 5 out of 6. Ireland must be giggling up their sleeves.
If the Wallabies improve on this effort - their handling, and the lacklustre first 30 minutes of the second half - I'll be happy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
The good thing with matches at 12h30 French time is I can take a 2 hour pause to watch them. 
(well, not too often).
Although the Australian tighthead did a good match, your loose prop was err... well, not up to the task.
In Argentina, Ledesma has been abysmal. Next thursday, when I miss a throw, I will be able to say that I haven't played worse than him.
I think the Australian match was quite poor. I finally saw Wendell Sailor and believe this man is really good. He handles the ball quite well. I am not sure Pat Rogers is very trustworthy, however. The centers were also not up to the task. Considering the excellent performance of the pack (nice mauls and charges from Lyons in particular), the backs should have done better.
I know it's typical for a forward to say that les filles have messed, but here, I think it's obvious. If Australia doesn't play better against players like O'Driscoll and Humphreys, they will have problems.
Argentina has really been pitiful overall. Totally uninspired except for their full back and Contepomi, who managed to waste all his efforts by missing systematically every kick but one.
I seriously think that Australians have to find their marks soon, or they could lose to Ireland.
Now, I can't wait to see NZ - Italy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|