 |
|  |
 |
|
FrustratedPoet
|
 |
All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Mar 2002 time: 05:31
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3149030.stm
quote: A Kurdish Muslim who cut his daughter's throat because she was having a relationship with a Christian has been jailed for life.
The Old Bailey heard Abdalla Yones, 48, murdered 16-year-old Heshu at their home, in Acton, west London, because he feared she was becoming westernised.
In a letter to her parents, apparently showing she planned to run away, Heshu wrote: "Bye Dad, sorry I was so much trouble.
"Me and you will probably never understand each other, but I'm sorry I wasn't what you wanted, but there's some things you can't change.
"Hey, for an older man you have a good strong punch and kick.
"I hope you enjoyed testing your strength on me, it was fun being on the receiving end. Well done." |

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MikeH
That's based on what I've read about the situation in the US. The appeals process and time spent on death row etc. costs more than just keeping them in high security for life and I don't think it'd be much different here. The outcry if you made a mistake would be too high.
|
It depends on where in the US - in Calfornia, where they're serious about sentencing people to death but have no intention of actually executing anyone, you also get the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has never seen or heard of a frivolous reason for filing a "gangplank" appeal and getting a stay of execution. Even if it's the same reason and virtually the same filing that you were rejected on ten years ago.
In other states and Federal judicial appellate circuits, the cost figures are different because you have real screening of appeals for merit, and faster docketing of capital appeals.
It's also a bit of a frivolous argument, because it's predicated on the idea that if you sentence someone to life without parole, they're not worth appeal time and costs whether they're guilty or not. How is it "moral" to worry about the innocence or guilt of a capital defendant, while not concerning yourself equally with the guilt or innocence of a non-capital defendant nevertheless sentenced to die behind bars, just a bit more slowly? 
quote:
Also in this case, the guy wants to be executed. Keeping him alive is a worse punishment because he has to live with what he's done. |
Because he killed her for her "sin" against Allah, he probably expects to be in paradise. And I doubt "living with what he's done" is too hurtful, since it's typical of that mentality (and she was only a daughter ) to be proud of having prevented an embarassment and moral stain on the family. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|