 |
|
Snotty
|
|
I dont really consider Turkey to be fully geographically part of Europe. Parts are most definetly middle east.
If we let Turkey in, what about Russia? Parts of Russia are eastern Europe, but as for the rest of it.....
How far are we going to let this union spread?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
Im actually for Turkeys entry. I think the union, and its rules, could do a lot of good for the Turkish people, and beyond.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
quote: too muslim, too asian etc. |
Ouch. Most of the complaints I hear are about human rights records.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
Some of Turkey is in Europe....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
I dont get your point gangerwolf.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Generally involving women's rights? |
Er, I think stoping torture was quite high on the list.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
I guess I must consider western human rights to be superior, and I would see it as a good thing if Turkey adopted our view on human rights. If it could then spread, all the better.
As for the torture thing, criminals sometimes arent allowed lawyers straight away and then they get tortured by the police. Theres many more....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:31
|
|
With their population and growth thereof, a muslim society would soon be the strongest single force in the EU. Plus, it'd set an example for other muslim countries with similarly high population growth. I don't want them to decide the fate of my children.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:31
|
|
Why not?
Simple: They will cost us money.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
Daniel, how would you describe german attitude towards the turks in general? I was lead to believe there was a lot of racism in Germany towards the turks. Is this true?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cookie Monster
|
 |
New England
Jul 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
Human Rights Record? That would obligatorily change with the entrance to the EU, and you people know it. The Turks are already changing stuff just because of the chance that you'll let them in!
I am baffled, really.... What is it? |
Are they really? Can you point is to some sources? Last time I checked it was forbidden to speak Armenian/Kurdish in public. How can Europe let a repressive state like this into it's union? Please clarify.
How does Pan-Turanism sit with you as an alternate to Pan-Arabism?
edit: IMO neither is desireable for peace and security in the ME.
Last edited by Cookie Monster on 07-10-2003 at 01:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
quote: Briefing Paper
January 2003
Introduction
The process of Turkey's accession to the E.U. has, since 1999, emerged as the most important catalyst of reform in Turkey. The E.U.'s progress report for 2001 made it clear that Turkey was lagging behind in its efforts to meet the E.U. accession conditions of "democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities." In 2002, the Turkish government seemed to get serious about meeting the criteria and enacted significant reforms in February and August which, among other things, abolished the death penalty, provided detainees with greater access to lawyers, and lifted restrictions on broadcasting in minority languages, including Kurdish.
|
http://www.hrw.org/press/2003/01/turky-bck013003.htm
If they have lifted broadcast restrictions, they must have lifted it for public speaking as well?
btw the people at human rights watch seem very pissed at turkey, but even they say reforms are happening and things are getting beter because of Turkeys possible entry into the eu.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|