 |
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
quote: Urban Ranger said: What are you talking about? These are missiles, not unguided rockets. The arsenal now also include cruise missiles and long range ASM and anti-radiation missiles. |
Okay, I put it poorly. The history so far of non-prescision guided missles having a significant impact on military operations is nil. The Chinese do not have a precision cruise missle with capabilities of modern US weapons - with submunitions and guidance within several feet of the target. Yes, the Chinese can put the missle in the vicinity of the target. Any kind of hardening will defeat it, and somehow I cannot see the Taiwanese military not hardening their military installations given the long history of China and various types of medium range missle, back to the Scud and Styx era (long range missles are germane to their relations with the US, not Taiwan except indirectly). The only significant military damage (without WMD) I can see the Chinese doing would be to runways immediately before they started the aviation campaign. However, since Taiwan would not be deploying heavy aircraft, even short intact stretches of runway would be sufficient to scramble their fighter force. Radar-anti-radar missles conflicts are usually decided by the side with the best electronics, and right now that is still Taiwan.
Your point about the missles and Taiwan's stock market are extremely germane. However, as other posters have eloquently put it, this would be cutting off their nose to spite their face, China would take a massive economic hit also. Then the issue I made about a unified versus factional party leadership come in to play. To misuse a phrase, "Golden handcuffs." 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
How are things in the Xinjiang province, as a contrast to the coast, mindseye? |
Shanghai is the pinacle of the capstone of a huge pyramid. Xinjiang is pretty far from the top.
Xinjiang has recently fared better than some of the other poorer western provinces in that it has valuable natural resources (oil) to be extracted. I have not been there yet, and can only give you my best impression from a distance. It seems that development is quickly gathering pace there, but that the Uighurs (the local caucasian minority, for those not familiar) are not getting a fair slice of the action taking place on their home turf. They can't get the good jobs going to better educated Han. In general the Han Chinese (at least around here) think of the Uighurs in terms almost identical to the way many westerners think of "gypsies" (i.e. colorful, musical but highly suspect outsiders who like spicy food and are liable to rob you).
I think their situation is not disimilar to that of many Tibetans. They are happy to see things improving so rapidly, but they are worried about their local culture being swept away in a tide of development and Han immigrants. They are not economically benefiting from the development like Han Chinese are. From what I gather I think the Uighurs dislike the Han more than the Tibetans do.
I hope to get out to those areas before long, and to see for myself.
Last edited by mindseye on 02-12-2003 at 22:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Then can we assume that the pics you've been posting are far from typical. |
Oh, no they are certainly not typical for Xinjiang, and I don't think I ever represented them as such. In fact, if you put your bifocals on, I think you will see that the photo was in a section prefaced with "Some contemporary indicators of urban life in China (lead by Shanghai):" I would have hoped that was sufficiently clear, sorry if it was not.
I edited the horrific mistake in the first line of my previous post (sorry, typed while stoned). I intended to say that Shanghai is the pinnacle of the capstone, sorry if my error caused you confusion.
The photo is, however, typical of a great deal of Shanghai, and to a lesser degree other urban areas. The eastern cities are the current Ground Zero of development. The gov't has decided it makes more sense to flash-develop the cities, then turn to the farms - a view I cannot argue with.
To give it some perspective, in a span of about twenty years China has moved a number of people equivalent to the popluation of the US from third world living standards to near-contemporary western levels. However, they "only" managed to do this for a few hundred million people so far, the ripples of development are only now gathering speed in the far reaches of the country, in places like Xinjiang. How it will pan out there is anyone's guess at the moment.
Change is happening everywhere, but there are great disparities in it's speed. I personally do not find this surprising nor objectionable, as long as there is a plan that includes everyone, which there seems to be.
I promise to post more photos soon, I have been taking many lately (that one was not mine, by the way).
Last edited by mindseye on 02-12-2003 at 23:10
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
mindseye, it seems that if movement from the countryside to the city were freely allowed with full social benefits, the cities of China, particually the Eastern cities, would soon be overwhelmed by the poor. |
Which is exactly why the gov't tries (with some success) to restrict this movement. They are determined not to allow Chinese cities to develop peripheral rings of dismal shanty towns of the type seen all over the developing world.
quote: In the US and most Western countries, the gradual urbanization of the population has be underway for more than 100 years. How is China going to cope with hundreds of millions of very poor, underemployed farmers?
Build factories in the hinterland? |
I'm sorry, I can only give you a general answer on this topic. It's certainly one of the greatest challenges facing Beijing. Part of the answer is allowing the inevitable urbanization to proceed, but at a controlled level (versus tidal wave).
Meanwhile, they are starting to ramp up investment in basic infrastructure for the countryside. One of the reasons Chinese farmers are so poor is that their infrastructure is so under-developed. Many can only grow crops that can be sold within walking/biking distance of their farm. If they could get their crops on a truck to a neighboring city, they could access new markets and grow different and more profitable kinds of crops. This requires things like modern highways, as well as better education and business consulting.
Examples of how this can work are the farmers who have succesfully switched over to raising labor-intensive organically-grown vegetables, mushrooms, and herbs for export to Japan.
But this is only a part of the solution. Making the farmers more productive is great, but the sheer scale of under-employment in the countryside is (like anything in China) massive. And this doesn't even address the problems in the northeast "rust belt" where urban areas are already contending with large numbers of laid-off former SOE factory workers.
Beijing has been saying that develpment of the west must be a national priority. How succesfully they manage it may well decide China's future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:32
|
|
quote: Now that's the usual level of searing intellectual high flying analysis that we've all come to know and expect from our beloved Drake Tungsten.
Don't bother replying, either. You're on my ignore list so I can't read what you're saying anyway. |
Wow, I never had you pegged as one of the humorless posters on Poly before this...
quote: This statement would be laughable if it is not so pathetic. Considering the difficulties the US forces are facing in Iraq, "hollow sounding" does not even begin to decribe the gross ignorance and arrogance contained within. |
What's so laughable about it? China's saber rattling has always died down in the past once America became sufficiently concerned about the situation to deploy carrier battle groups to the Taiwan Strait. Given the current strategic situation of the US, however, we don't really want to send a couple valuable carrier groups to back down the Chinese once again, so we just told the Taiwanese to chill out for a while. Once our strategic situation is back to normal, however, I see no reason why the U.S. wouldn't return to the status quo, ie. publicly supporting the "One China" policy whilst turning a blind eye towards Taiwanese moves toward independence and providing military support whenever the Chinese decide to go into bully mode.
Feel free to continue to criticize my ignorance and arrogance, though. I could use a good laugh.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|