 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
They can't see their ears. |
I dont see what the big deal is. if they dont take it off then u can't examine their ears. ppl have a right to refuse examination still in france right?
or has that been removed?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
it was a joke yavoon
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
What when Schools are asked to "accomodate" their programs (notably in chemics and sports) so that the scarved girls don't have to get rid of the scarf? That's exactly the same. |
I agree, they should not be accomodated. but that doesn't mean that it should be banned from everywhere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DAVOUT
When a person enter an hospital for care, he/she fall under the esponsibility of the doctors of this hospital. If they refused to be examined or refuse to leave their clothes, which in most cases make the exmination impossible, what the doctor must do ? He has no right to reject the malad, and he has not a notary near him to record the situation. Calling the police is not in the spirit of the hospital, and disturb heavily the normal life of the medics. It seems reasonable to clear the point that any person coming to the hospital should accept its rules. Worth to mention that this point never made problem before, and was raised recemtly when it reached an excessively disturbing point. Doctors are particularly worried by their responsibility. |
I would simply have the doctors do what the patient let them do and not more. but certainly if u were really rabid about it u could say if you are unwilling to allow the doctors to work then u must leave the hospital.
as for "recording it" u could simply have them sign some standard document of their refusal of help. its not really that difficult.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mazarin
But what does the scarf stand for? Many muslims today say, that the scarf is no longer required to be worn as it reflects outdated laws taken into the Koran. The use of the headscarf has been dramatically on the rise in the last century -either in countries with newly islamistic governments or among communities that supported extreme interpretations of the koran (including oppression of women/taking the law in one's hands/etc.)
this way, the headscarf has also become a political statement that clearly objects the values of our societies: taking these out of schools (haven't seen the hospital proposal either) seems like a not that bad idea to me. If an extreme ideology is mantled into religion -shall we accept their signs in schools? |
yes because freedom includes the things u dont like.
or did they not teach u that in france?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yavoon
why is it the gov'ts problem to solve? I still think it is up to the individual and family, and while I dont like seeing ppl miss school because of religion I certainly dont feel like stripping them of their beliefs so that they fit better into society. |
I agree. However the state has both an obligation and a right to provide educaton to everyone up to 16 years old (I think) completely free and completely obligatory at least here. For example parents who don't send their kids to school (like many of the Gypsie families here unfortunately) face prison. If this is enforced however, it's another matter.
In any case if you have a generation without education you have many more problems but I agree that freedom of expression should be as high as education in values.
I can see the french problem/complications too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mazarin
Schools are not a forum for all kind of ideoligic bullsh!t:
If someone came to school with racist/nazi/whatever stuff on his shirt, he should be sent home. |
holy tangential batman.
if he's being disruptive he should be sent home. otherwise freedoms are freedoms.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
I agree. However the state has both an obligation and a right to provide educaton to everyone up to 16 years old (I think) completely free and completely obligatory at least here. For example parents who don't send their kids to school (like many of the Gypsie families here unfortunately) face prison. If this is enforced however, it's another matter.
In any case if you have a generation without education you have many more problems but I agree that freedom of expression should be as high as education in values.
I can see the french problem/complications too. |
I am more willing to compromise on freedoms when it comes to the treatment of children for sure. even though this is tangential I do see this as an area for compromise.
but I hardly see how banning clothing in school lends itself to this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Yes, a patient can refuse part of an examination. There is no need for some new law. The doctor simply has to record in the chart that he offered the exam and explained the consequences of not having the exam performed despite which the patient refused. If you're really testy you can have the patient sign or initial a statement.
I've dealt with scarfed muslim women, it wasn't a big problem. If they have a complaint regarding their ears or scalp they simply lift the scarf for awhile. There are plenty of women who are uncomfortable about having a man do their Gyn exam. I've never had a problem with referring those women to a female physician. It's a simple matter of common decency.
I wonder if these rules affect giving last unction?
Are you certyain that expressions of atheisism are also banned? Someone should give that a test.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|