 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
"Once, as I was going to the inner city, I suddenly encountered an apparition in a black caftan and black hair locks. It is a Jew? was my first thought.
For, to be sure, they had not looked like that in Linz. I observed the man furtively and cautiously, but the longer I stared at this foreign face, scrutinizing feature for feature, the more my first questions assumed a new form:
Is this a German?"
Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf," Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971 at 56.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: Wearing the skullcap/headscarf are both nessecary actions that are required by their respective faiths, and pose no direct harm to other people. Nor does wearing a skullcap by itself proselytize. |
That's why I proposed a different wording of the law. Wearing scarves or kippas doesn't hurt most of the time, except in certain classes like sports or chemistry. Wearing face covering hurts in all cases.
For those who comment about Iraq and bash France for its refusal of interverntion, let me remind you that the U.S. called for war in order to find out WoMD, a search which was far from successful, and that the French president said that, if the reason invoked had been to get rid of a dictator, the French reaction could have been different. The government might have acted the same, but the population would certainly had felt better on a war to get rid of a tyrant rather than a war to take the oil, errr... find inexistant weapons.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by LDiCesare
That's why I proposed a different wording of the law. Wearing scarves or kippas doesn't hurt most of the time, except in certain classes like sports or chemistry. Wearing face covering hurts in all cases.
For those who comment about Iraq and bash France for its refusal of interverntion, let me remind you that the U.S. called for war in order to find out WoMD, a search which was far from successful, and that the French president said that, if the reason invoked had been to get rid of a dictator, the French reaction could have been different. The government might have acted the same, but the population would certainly had felt better on a war to get rid of a tyrant rather than a war to take the oil, errr... find inexistant weapons. |
But, all this shows is that Bush acted primarily to defend the US (and France), not to liberate Iraq. Had the US, or the world for that matter, been TRULY concerned over the plight of the Iraqi people, it would have acted in '91 when it had the opportunity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|