 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zkribbler
So let me get this straight . . small religious symbols--which are worn by Christians--are okay. But headgear like headscarves and skullcaps--neither of which are worn by Christians--are banned. Hmm, I wonder what the message is here. |
Christians are forbidden to wear obviously seeable religious symbols in public schools exactly the same way as Muslims, Jews, or Buddhists, or whatever... There is no religious obligation by the Christians to wear obvious signs, so more power to them. But it means a kid does not have the right to come at school with a "Jesus rules" T-shirt, nor is he allowed to wear a large cross as a pendant like the Sisters are wearing.
Besides, small symbols of whatever religion are allowed. Discrete pendants of David's Star, of the moon crescent, or of the cross, are allowed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mazarin
well...if I see that something obviously goes extremely wrong (like the mentioned uprise of islamism in western Europe), then yes, I really think something has to be done. Simply ignoring the problem and putting the most obvious crimes to court (the greatest part -like violence at home remains hidden in most cases) is not enough for me. If freedom of religion implies letting children grow in an athmosphere where they are indoctrinated to disregard the most essential values of the society they live in -I'm willing to watch at my concept of religious freedom and expand it to "freedom to chose ones religion". It is not an easy question, but you sometimes need to have a closer look when one fundamental right is hurting another (to take one extreme example: If a religion implies cannibalistic rituals -am I going to do something against it or am I going to wait until the rituals have been performed and judge the participants according to laws). Freedoms of one person can be limiting the freedoms of others: giving up the freedom of wearing religious signs at school seems like a good deal when spreading freedom of choice, equality and free thought. in my book, at least. |
the free choice to not wear religious clothes. the free thot to not think about ppl wearing religious clothes and the equality that everyone's freedoms are infringed at an equal level!
france is truly a great bastion of freedom.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Not that one thing has anything to do with another, but the United States is the only Industrialized nation to have school prayer in public schools |
No you're not.
Pater imon, o en tis ouranis,
agiasthito to onoma sou,
eltheto i vasilia sou,
gennithito to thelima sou,
os en ourano kai epi tis gis.
Ton arton imon ton epiousion
dos imin simeron
kai afes imin ta ofilimata imon,
os kai imis afieme tis ofiletis imon,
kai mi isenegis imas is pirasmon,
alla risse imas apo tou ponirou.
Amin.
*cross* (yawn) *cross* (yawn) *cross*
Ok pupils, to your classes in good order

Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 22-12-2003 at 15:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:32
|
|
I just want to point out that the law is not (yet?) voted.
I think one of the big cultural differences between France and other countries is that we tend to view religion as a private matter, and as such, any outward sign of religion is seen as proselytism.
I think that the law should state that religious symbols which hinder either education or treatment should be removed, respectively at school and at hospital.
This would force people to remove scarves to go swimming, which is sensible, and swimming can save one's life, yours or someone else's, so it must be taught. Same goes for hospital. The point is that if a patient refuses to be healed for religious reasons, the responsibility is his instead of the doctor's, as Spiffor already explained.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by LDiCesare
I just want to point out that the law is not (yet?) voted.
I think one of the big cultural differences between France and other countries is that we tend to view religion as a private matter, and as such, any outward sign of religion is seen as proselytism.
I think that the law should state that religious symbols which hinder either education or treatment should be removed, respectively at school and at hospital.
This would force people to remove scarves to go swimming, which is sensible, and swimming can save one's life, yours or someone else's, so it must be taught. Same goes for hospital. The point is that if a patient refuses to be healed for religious reasons, the responsibility is his instead of the doctor's, as Spiffor already explained. |
Wearing the skullcap/headscarf are both nessecary actions that are required by their respective faiths, and pose no direct harm to other people. Nor does wearing a skullcap by itself proselytize.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|