 |
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
What offends people here is the merest mention that there might have been a reason for what this woman did-
|
Funny. I thought the artists called her behavior inexplicaple.
quote:
this is why they scream that this is gloryfication: becuase we are to see her as sme animal-or better yet, some evil spirit
|
I see her as an individual who took it upon her self to try to murder as many innocent people as she could in cold blood, and managed to murder twenty one. No reason justifies cold bloodedly killing innocent people.
quote:
This woman did what she did for a reason, but what she did was a horrible and despicable crime. And the fact that this happened, the fact this woman, with her seemingly promising life, average life, middle class life went and did what she did is what astounds: what chalenges the "truth" we have built for ourselves, that "our" kind of people, fr she is our kind of people, did something we think simply can not be associated with us |
Ooh. Oooh. Two can play at that game.
This ambassador did what he did for a reason, but what he did was a crime. And the fact that this happened, the fact this man, with his seemingly promising life went and did what he did astrounds: it challenges the "truth" the Swedes have built for themselves, that "their" kind of people, for he is their kind of people, did something that they think simply can not be associated with them.
quote:
but it insults some here for not making her a charicature of evil |
Actually, I said that I didn't think an evil caricature was appropriate, either. 
Last edited by Edan on 20-01-2004 at 00:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
We are only having a nine page thread because some people either haven't read the artists' own explanation of what the piece is about or don't believe them (despite having no good reason not to).
|
If it's clear, why would anyone need to read the artists explanation?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Edan
Funny. I thought the artists called her behavior inexplicaple. |
I am not one of the people arguing alongside the artist, so I could care less
quote:
I see her as an individual who took it upon her self to try to murder as many innocent people as she could in cold blood, and managed to murder twenty one. No reason justifies cold bloodedly killing innocent people.
|
Who ever brough up "justification"- you simply continue the great mistake of making "explination" or "examination" into "justification"
quote:
Ooh. Oooh. Two can play at that game.
This ambassador did what he did for a reason, but what he did was a crime. And the fact that this happened, the fact this man, with his seemingly promising life went and did what he did astrounds: it challenges the "truth" the Swedes have built for themselves, that "their" kind of people, for she is their kind of people, did something that they think simply can not be associated with them.
|
First of all, the whole "promising life" part is utterly out of place- second, he is a diplomat- that is a job description, not a life description, class distinction. Swedes is a nationality, not a word for members of the diplomatic corp. Overall, a sad attempt at a response. care to make a thoughtfull one?
quote:
Actually, I said that I didn't think an evil caricature was appropriate, either. |
NOtice how I did not address my post to you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Snotty
|
|
Yes, that is an interesting site. They also said:-
quote: ''Both the Israeli and Swedish governments appear anxious to put the incident behind them. The Swedish government is considering issuing a conciliatory note, according to sources in the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem, as well as hints offered by Swedish Ambassador Robert Rydberg.
The Swedish foreign ministry said Sunday it still expects Mazel to participate in a symposium on genocide to be held Monday at the Stockholm museum where he vandalized the artwork.
Officials in Jerusalem said they would be be satisfied with an appropriately conciliatory statement by Sweden, and that this would enable the Israeli delegation to attend the conference as planned.'' |
So it looks like Israel will be going to the conference now?
Ned,
quote:
It appears that this may be part of a larger pattern that is actually planned in Israel. |
Im not sure I follow you. Are you saying this is more evidence that the incident was pre-planned, or masterminded by the Israeli government?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mercator
|
 |
Sorekara no Nanimo
Jan 1970 time: 06:33
|
|
An artist makes a work of art that might be open for interpretation. He then accompanies it with a piece of text that describes the horrific acts commited by this "Snow White". Upon further asking, the person continues to explain it is in no way trying to glorify or condone the suicide bomber's actions.
In what way can this possibly be explained as being anti-semitic? If the artist actually was lying and being an anti-semitic um... Israeli Jew, the only bad thing that could imply is that he's going to bed with a smirk on his face, thinking about how he fooled the world, while the rest of the world would consider it a sad reminder of the tragic ME situation.
A little boy tries to hit a few nails in a plank of wood, but eh doesn't have anything to hit them with. I present him with a screwdriver and a hammer. Unaware of their practical intention, the boy picks the screwdriver and hits a nail in. I then explain to him that it's easier and more practical to use the hammer. If the boy then continues to use the screwdriver he's either stupid or stubborn.
If the boy had picked the hammer and I tried to convince him the screwdriver was better, I'd just be stupid. Doing that wouldn't be beneficial to either of us, except perhaps give me the satisfaction of laughing at the boy behind his back.
In other words, it might be understandable for people to interpret it as being anti-semitic. But once you've heard the artists intentions, the only logical thing to do is accept and respect them.
If the artist was being deceitful, it would only lead to misunderstanding and disrespect. Since expressing an opinion or provoking thoughts from the on-lookers is an integral part of art, doing this would be counter-productive for and artist. At worst it would give him some twisted personal pleasure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Generalissimo
|
|
Haifa
Jan 2003 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cruddy
Nah. What pisses them off is we don't back Israel.
We don't back the Arabs either - if we did, Israel would really have a war on their hands. I don't think this is the way forward though. |
Quite frankly me (and most of the Israeli government) don’t really care whether you back us up or not we got used to the fact that you turn a blind eye on what happening in this s**t hole.
As long as you buy our products your diplomatic support is second-class compared to the US.
Why waste time in the EU when you have the US by your side.
Besides, unlike India we cant sell you arms to make you more tolerant towards our cause.
As far as the whole mess in Stockholm, that was a provocation. Sponsored (as far as I know) by the Swedish government and they should have known that this art might be offensive. Its just basic manners
Third, Israeli diplomats and Jews in general are systematically raping the term “Anti –Semite”. Not everyone that disagrees with you is a nazi lover.
Note:My English Sucks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:33
|
|
What I wonder is, can nobody see that the only way to portray such an utterly tragic and grotesque situation as we have in Israel is by the artistic technique of irony and grotesque? A sticky sweet cliche tearfest cannot touch you and convey such emotions in a way even approaching an image of, say, Snow White standing in the middle of a pool of blood. We are all people, PEOPLE, you know, just ordinary people caught in something that turns us into bloody monsters, no matter how innocent or whatever we are. Our innocence is drowned in blood - an incomprehensible and terrible cycle of death. It's not about her reasons or whatever. It is about what even Snow White, living here, is turned into. And that says it all about everybody else, too. But most importantly, this is art trying to convey the incomprehensible, the paradoxical in the only way possible - by the deepest emotion, but cruelly twisting and tearing at the strings of our hearts - without mercy because there IS no mercy in the universe it is trying to portray.
This brings to mind a poem I've never read in full although I plan to - the Rime of the Ancient Mariner by Coleridge... In the same way, the star shines through the moon to portray the unnatural world into which the mariner enters when he forsakes love and mercy and all the rest; Only here it is not just anyone - it is Snow White, innocence embodied, that forsakes those things and her humanity. That is why this is so powerful.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:33
|
|
Edan:
If you can't see the difference between a pro-Hamas propaganda piece and the artwork in question... I don't know why anyone's even trying to explain this to you, because you're not going to get it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
There plenty of pics of "terminated" 4 year old palestinian "terrorists" too. But I doubt Edan would be swayed? They hardly fill a pool of blood eitherway seeing as they're too small. The palestinian fatalities are double that of Israelis. Let us not forget about this very simple truth when talking so liberally about "blood".
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|