 |
|
Edan
|
|
Here is one person who's interpretation, IMO, matters far more than anyone's here:
quote: Ora Regev, whose son Nir was killed in the attack at Maxim restaurant, told The Jerusalem Post she would like to thank Mazel for his actions. "He did exactly what needed to be done," Regev said. "This may not have been diplomatically or politically correct, but the time has come for people to think about us as well, about our feelings."
She said the exhibit, which she only heard about following the incident, is a terrible insult to the families of the victims, and is a "prize for the terrorist."
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
Wow, 7 pages and one ban too - 8/10 to Winston, Ned and others.
As to the topic, I doubt this ambassador simply acted rashly, such persons get filtered from diplomacy before getting into important positions. I think he knew what he was doing, and if I was Swedish govt. I'd pack him to the first plane to Israel, with a copy of "Rules of diplomatic conduct", on government expense.
Just to be clear, Israelis have every right to be pissed if they care to, but that changes nothig in this case.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
I find it quite amuzing that both you and KH argue on the one had that it was inappropriate for the Israeli ambassordor to lose his cool in face of provocation and to justify similar behavior by yourselves if someone says something with which you strongly disagree. |
And I find it quite "amuzing" that you can be so repetitive and ignorant of the situation.
Let's lay it out, nice and simple:
Israeli ambassador finds out about art display that angers him because he doesn't understand it. He plans to destroy it. He attacks said artwork, physically.
KH is trying in vain to get his point across to certain people in this thread, and when he is met with stubbornness and repetitiveness, he snaps and attacks you (Ned), verbally.
There is a world of difference.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk
This is what I don't understand. It is an international conference where Israel is an invitee. Now, maybe things have changed in diplomacy, but I thought there was a rule that when nations do things like this, they make sure the setting isn't going to annoy the participants. "Shape of the table" and all that. Whether the exhibit is offensive or not (and I stand by my assessment), if Israel had mounted objections to it beforehand, wouldn't it be proper for the Swedes to oblige? |
Considering the artwork is in no way intended to support anti-Israeli activities, maybe the Swedes thought that Israel wouldn't mind?
Also: it's an international conference with many countries attending. It's not as if Sweden invited a team of Israeli diplomats over, and then accosted them, personally, with pro-Palestinian propaganda.
It was just a work of art, one of many in an art show that itself was simply one part of the conference.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|