 |
|
Tamerlin
|
 |
Toulouse (South-western France)
Apr 2002 time: 06:33
|
|
I have tried to put the various strings into the appropriate French files.
I would prefer "someone who knows" to check if the new strings are not at the wrong place inside each file.
Attachment: newstrings_french_092004.zip
This has been downloaded 6 time(s).
Last edited by Tamerlin on 17-09-2004 at 03:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
Well, that's always a problem with these civ attributes.
I mean, countryside Thai will probably never have heard of Bangkok (they know that city by the Thai name of Krung Thep). Had the Thai conquered the world, we certainly wouldn't know their capital by its Chinese name... And how many ancient Egyptians do you think knew their own capital as Thebes or their leader as Ramses? Virtually all 'Egyptian' names in the game are actually Greek (the same goes for a lot of Persian names). Just like many Carthaginian names are Roman or Greek, Mayan/Incan/Aztec names are Spanish, Native American names are English or French, etc. In the later two cases we often down even know the indigenous names.
And there are a lot more of such problems when creating civs and city lists. I mean, should the capital of Ethiopia be the modern Addis Ababa or the classical Aksum? Out of 5000 years of Chinese history Beijing was only the capital for a few hundred years, yet on most city lists Beijing is the first city. When making the English city list, which cities are most important, the big industrial cities of today that were small villages two centuries ago (Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, etc) or cities which are not very well known outside England today but have a long history going back to Roman times (Lincoln, Canterbury, Salisbury, etc)? Should a Dutch city list include only Dutch names or also Belgian ones? And what to do with Dutch colonies like New York, Cape Town and Jakarta?
There is no objectively correct answer to any of those questions. Different people will have different expectations depending on their knowledge of Ethiopian, Chinese, English or Dutch history respectively. For me, putting Manchester and Liverpool near the top of an English city list would be a major 'turn-off', yet virtually all English city lists I've ever seen do just this. Same with Beijing as Chinese capital. Afonso as Bantu leader is just one choice in a long list of such issues: do you go with historical accuracy or people's expectations? And when you go for historic accuracy, how do you deal with the way civs influenced each other (which is extremely common thoughout history and also a two-way ticket)?
That the very reason I've been working on my own civ mod: I want to make city lists entirely based on historical accuracy rather than people's expectations, and I want to be as historically accurate as I can be. That means a LOT of research, which explains why I'm still only about 2/3rd done after 5 years.
Where the name Afonso I and the Bantu civ in general is concerned, I didn't create that civ and I didn't bother to change anything about it, as it has been part of the MedMod and other mods for 4 or 5 years now and noone complained before. But if you ask for my opinion, the Bantu civ itself is a bit questionable: Bantu is a language group, not a civ. But there are other much more questionable civs in the game already, so if I were to reform the list I wouldn't start there. As far as the name Afonso goes, it's quite common for Africans to adopt non-native names, it's an intrical part of their culture. Their leaders often do it for political/diplomatical reasons: they often took names of important neighbours or allies, even if those neighbours were of a different language (or even language group). Most of the time we westerners wouldn't notice as we wouldn't know the difference between Mandika and Soninke if it slapped us in the face. To an Mande-African, it doesn't really matter if take a European, Arab or Khoisan-African name, it's all equally exotic to them. (You can also see this habit back in some of the unusual names of African Americans, they often borrow names from other cultures or even invent entirely new names.) So even if the Bantu had invaded Europe rather than the other way around, it's still entirely plausible their leaders would've picked European names for themselves.
So Afonso really isn't such a bad name for an African leader. If you want to add more flavour, I think adding the title would be a good idea. That works for most civs actually, not just Africans: I mean, given the choice between "Sire, we have received a message from Ferdinand" and "Sire, we have received a message from Ferdinand V of Castilla, King of Spain", I'll take the latter...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Martin Gühmann
|
 |
Berlin, Germany
Mar 2001 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Locutus
But if you ask for my opinion, the Bantu civ itself is a bit questionable: Bantu is a language group, not a civ. But there are other much more questionable civs in the game already, so if I were to reform the list I wouldn't start there. |
Well that was my reason to include another civ instead of the Bantus, the city list contains countries rather cities, and as said the leader name doesn't fit according to my expectations. Also the Slaves are questionable, again a laguage subgroup. And the third civ I removed are the Italians they are in heritage of the Romans. What would the world speak if the Imperium Romanum still exists, probably something else then the ancient Latin. Probably something with reduced inflection system as we can see it in the modern Roman languages. However Mossulini himself saw his country in tradition of the Roman Empire as well. Well so much about the historic accuracy of the civ names you find in ApolytonPack.
quote: Originally posted by Locutus
As far as the name Afonso goes, it's quite common for Africans to adopt non-native names, it's an intrical part of their culture. Their leaders often do it for political/diplomatical reasons: they often took names of important neighbours or allies, even if those neighbours were of a different language (or even language group). Most of the time we westerners wouldn't notice as we wouldn't know the difference between Mandika and Soninke if it slapped us in the face. To an Mande-African, it doesn't really matter if take a European, Arab or Khoisan-African name, it's all equally exotic to them. (You can also see this habit back in some of the unusual names of African Americans, they often borrow names from other cultures or even invent entirely new names.) So even if the Bantu had invaded Europe rather than the other way around, it's still entirely plausible their leaders would've picked European names for themselves. |
Obviously it is a different culture. Well you can also change your name here in Germany, but I doubt it is done very often. A name here is a part of the identity, something that belongs to your person.
quote: Originally posted by Locutus
So Afonso really isn't such a bad name for an African leader. If you want to add more flavour, I think adding the title would be a good idea. That works for most civs actually, not just Africans: I mean, given the choice between "Sire, we have received a message from Ferdinand" and "Sire, we have received a message from Ferdinand V of Castilla, King of Spain", I'll take the latter... |
That is a good idea, but I wonder if we should seperate name and title, because it is also government specific.
-Martin
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Martin Gühmann
Well that was my reason to include another civ instead of the Bantus, the city list contains countries rather cities, and as said the leader name doesn't fit according to my expectations. Also the Slaves are questionable, again a laguage subgroup. And the third civ I removed are the Italians they are in heritage of the Romans. What would the world speak if the Imperium Romanum still exists, probably something else then the ancient Latin. Probably something with reduced inflection system as we can see it in the modern Roman languages. However Mossulini himself saw his country in tradition of the Roman Empire as well. Well so much about the historic accuracy of the civ names you find in ApolytonPack. |
You can put an awful lot of civs under fire if you want: why are the Scottish, Irish, Welsh AND Celts all represented? That's a bit overkill (IMO at least 2 too many). Or how about Phoenicians and Carthaginians? Also, besides cigars and missile crises, what contributions to world history did Cuba ever make? And I don't even want to mention Nicaragua (but I'm doing it anyway ). The Native American civ is extremely lame, with as city names the names of tribes (each (once) often consisting of millions of individuals, spread over areas larger than most European civs ever covered). The Zulu don't exhibit a single trait of what we usually describe as 'a civilization', yet they're in the game (while other nearby but far more suitable people like the Swahili city states or the Great Zimbabwe are ignored). Also, Zulu is a subgroup of the Bantu. Should we really see the Byzantines as seperate from the Romans? Can you really summarize 5,000 years of history of an area the size of the present-day EU in a single Indian civilization? Etc, etc...
I'm not saying each of these is a mistake or we should correct any or all of them, but why pick on the Bantu or Italians when there are plenty of other dubious choices? I say let's save ourselves the trouble of thoroughly revising the list of civs (after 5 years of blood, sweat and tears and still not being done, I can *strongly* recommend that we don't ) and just use the existing list complemented by whatever civs we happen to already have developed over the years. Historically all 18 new civs are at least as sound as the existing ones (whatever that may or may not be worth), so we're certainly not making things worse by doing so.
Maybe when my own civ list is done (in another 3 years or so ), you'll all be so much in awe with it you'll want to use that instead 
quote: Obviously it is a different culture. Well you can also change your name here in Germany, but I doubt it is done very often. A name here is a part of the identity, something that belongs to your person. |
That's a very European point of view 
quote: That is a good idea, but I wonder if we should seperate name and title, because it is also government specific. |
Hmmm, Prime-Minister C. Julius Ceasar? Chief Winston Churchill? President Jeanne d'Arc? I guess that would be kinda fun... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
Here is every uniquely Spanish text file from the CD, well i might have left some small ones in, but basically all gamedata and all layout files are here. I didnt know about the scenarios so I included each file with text that were in Spanish for each scenario.
http://apolyton.net/upload/view.php...Spanish_1.0.rar
Its like 850Kb.
I wont have time to upload them to the server for a couple of days, which is hopefully when Ill attempt to translate the new texts aswell.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|