 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:34
|
|
WHAT SHOULD THE REPUBLICAN PARTY STAND FOR:
IRAQ WAR
Fez: For
Harry: For
Imran: For, but could have been handled better.
QCubed: neutral, opposed to the way it was handled.
Ben: Against
ABORTION
Ben: Against in all
QCubed: abortion -- against,
Harry: Against, other than rape
Fez: Against, other than rape
Imran: For, other than Partial Birth
RELIGIOUS CHARITIES
Ben: For
QCubed: For
Imran: For
Harry: For
Fez: Against
GAY MARRIAGE
Ben: Against
QCubed: Neutral
Harry: For
Imran: For
Fez: For
TAX CUTS
Fez: For
QCubed: For
Harry: For
Ben: For
Imran: For, but not top
Last edited by Ben Kenobi on 08-03-2004 at 17:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:34
|
|
"Kerry opposed a balanced budget amendment (which I do as well, it's moronic), but that doesn't mean he's against balanced budgets in general. "
Just look at his career record. He has never been a fan of fiscal responsibility and has consistently favored greater spending on everything other then defense.
"And Bush had to be dragged kicking and screaming to Campaign Finance Reform, like Clinton had to with Welfare Reform. He doesn't back it and would love to it struck down."
Why? McCain Feingold's rules onsoft money has greatly benefited the GOP because the Dems relied on that more then the GOP.
"
And YES, I'm blaming GW for France. He could have easily soothed their pride like his father did. But, GW is no GHW."
We did make every effort to appease the French. We even accepted their initial UNSC plan that would require going back to the UNSC if a violation was found. Do you think Chirac is a moron who sways and bends at people paying respect to Gallic pride?
Chirac had his own interests in protecting his oil partner and in his own domestic popularity in opposing the war.
I wonder, Imran, would you have opposed Reagan as well? He too had a problem with deficits and with our foreign allies.
You're being short-sited. You are just looking at his campaign promises and what the initial situation will look like after Kerry is elected. You need to consider the fact you if elected you would then have a far-left Democratic liberal, one who has not been effected by Clinton's wave of Moderation, who has continued to stay to the far left (National Journal rated him the most liberal Senator in 2003), who would have the chance to leave his mark on the country for 4 or 8 years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rex Little
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
I dunno. Voting for Kerry doesn't seem like something a moderate Republican would do. With him being a higher rated liberal than even Ted Kennedy and all. I'd think they'd be more at home with the Libertarians. | I'm hoping that this is the year that those who are serious about shrinking government finally vote for a third party. Preferably Libertarian, but if not, then whatever party best fits their principles. Maybe it will throw the election to Kerry like Nader did for Dubya, but so what? What's Kerry going to do that's worse than Bush? Run record deficits? Put in a massive new entitlement program? Throw money at the NEA?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:34
|
|
Good thread, Imran. Sort of a Republican support group, you know?
Like a lot of people on this thread I defined myself as "socially left/fiscally right", which to the average schlub essentially means a smaller government, less taxes, and pro-choice. Tragically we have found ourselves with the Republican variant of Lyndon Baines Johnson; a president who loves to fight wars, both social and military, and will spare no cost in doing so. Dubya has shown himself to be "Socially right/fiscally left" in just about every decision he has made: tariffs, budgets, wars, Patriot Act, gays, stem cells, science funding, hell, even the Janet Jackson thing a month ago... is this all the FCC has to work on?
I didn't want this. To give y'all an idea of what sort of Republicans Laura and I are/were, back in 1997 we had 50 "Forbes 2000" bumper stickers printed up at our cost and passed them out around town. I don't even think his campaign made it to Georgia in 2000, but I'm pretty damned sure that if we had actually elected that sad-looking man to the presidency we wouldn't be talking about a constitutional amendment legalizing discrimination. :sigh:
As far as this election is concerned, I'll take a better look at Kerry than I did Al Gore, that is for certain. Whether or not I vote for him remains to be seen... but I am not going to dismiss the Democratic nominee as before.
http://www.johnkerry.com/
Last edited by JohnT on 07-03-2004 at 12:14
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|