 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:21
|
|
Curiously, I don't even remember that; albeit it sounds like a possible and good solution - the other faction referred to in it is presumably the Angels?
Last edited by Kassiopeia on 24-10-2004 at 08:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:21
|
|
It's in Finnish, but I hope to be able to translate the best parts (the whole novel even) into English sooner or later. The copyright will be entirely mine, I only need to submit to the organisers for word count verification (the only goal is to get 50k words done in thirty days. You can cheat, but there's really no point in it.) Putting it in Stories/Fiction as I translate might be an interesting project.
I'm writing a scifi piece, it takes place in a world where a growth called Legion has destroyed human civilization on the western and southern hemispheres, leaving Europe and Asia to fend for themselves. After fending for themselves for 20 years, the scientists battling the scourge are starting to develop a countermeasure, but for that, they need people who have a very unique genetical mutation.
This is where the protagonist kicks in - a very, very ordinary guy with a very, very extraordinary dna. It's going to go on from there to be a treatise on human psychology, moral issues and the nature of human relationships, with enough suspense and romance thrown in to not bore the reader - I fear I'm trying to get too much done in it, but I have to try.
The main thing is that I'm actually writing this thing out, it's been sitting in my head for two years. The community is nice too, I've shacked up with some fellow Finns on IRC where we share ideas and feelings.
A few lines which I've had to translate for various reasons already:
Mikael was hit for the first time by a sporestorm on a warm November afternoon.
And:
The operation was going perfectly, but Dr. Mallory had never learnt to like the smell of burning human flesh.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:21
|
|
Chaos Lemma:
Let it be known that despite our position on the free flow of information, if we willingly agree to some restriction on information flow, we will abide by it. Our position does not lead us to lie to our trade partners. The embargo with the Angels regarding Doc: Mobility is still in effect.
Illuminatus:
One note: we should maintain speedy negotiations since we will get Social Psych soon, so we expect details soon. We are willing to accept restrictions on free flow of informations if the price is acceptable.
Illuminatus:
The turnplaying process has started. Since we got no details from you, I am afraid you will have to preaccept Social Psych in your turn in whatever agreement we may achieve, since I doubt we can achieve agreement within next several hours.
Maniac:
I'm not so involved in diplomacy, so I'm not sure the Junta would agree with the exact proposals I make here, but since you asked for a speedy reply, I'll give you some overview of - as far as I know - the lines we were thinking along:
Unless you have besides Biogenetics other techs we don't possess, there is unfortunately no way for us to engage in a straight tech-for-tech trade. This leaves as far as I can tell two options open for us to trade:
a) We give you SocPsych. You give us a sum of credits in return.
b) We give you SocPsych. As a consequence you'll be able to switch research to something else. You then change to researching a tech we do not have yet and which we agree upon to switch to, and then you give it to us after researching. Leapfrogging in other words. An example of a tech we would be interested in would be Doctrine: Loyalty.
I'm not aware what's the Junta's position on trading embargo's or possible SP-restriction clausules for this particular trade.
Btw, Chaos Lemma reminded me: the Gaians can soon sell DocMob to the Angels! What should we do? Sell it ourselves to the Angels at a bargain price, or make the Gaians a proposal to sell the tech together to the Angels for a sum of credits, and split the profit in two, so as to prevent us competing against each other until we hardly get any profit out of selling the tech? Extra advantage would of course be that it would weaken the link between the Angels and Gaians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
And there's a lesson there for us somewhere.
We got beaten down by the Gaians as to the length of the embargo - to 5 years.
Then we got 2 turns delay in getting the Angels commlink thanks to the Gaians' internal "rule" about not mixing tech trades with commlinks (but really so that they could sell ours to the Angels in the same year they sold the Angels to us)
Then the Angels apepared deaf. Little contact, little interest, except their rant about "free flow of information"
I'd try to find out:
Have the Gaians any obligation to trade Social Psych to the Angels once they get it? (If not, then good. If yes, then what additional considerations might they be willing to give us in order to persuade us to give them Soc Psych without restrictions - perhaps agreeing not to build the CDF? - or perhaps agreeing to a 5 year extension on trading Doc Mobility to the Angels, to give us more time to reap a return on our investment)
Would the G's be willing, if we send them Soc Psych, to change immediately to Doc Loyalty and send that to us in 2147 (assuming that's when they get Soc Psych)
If we do nothing, then the Gaians will get Soc Psych as a self-researched tech in 2147, and presumably the Angels shortly thereafter, so unless we get a tech from either the Gaians or the Angels in return for sending Soc Psych, the net return will be that we lose part of our current tech superiority (of course, gifting the tech allowing the Gaians to change - and getting, say, Doc Loyalty next year also means that the Gaians (and presumably the Angels) also get Doc Loyalty next year, so that objection is somewhat spurious.)
So, IMO, we either make the best of a bad situation - and get Doc Loyalty in 2147, - prolly without any restrictions on their trading Soc Psych to the Angels (but like wise we can trade Doc Loyalty to Zal, Lal and Morgan) - or we say "A Plague on both your houses" and withdraw into isolationism and beef up our probe and transport production
If they are willing to do the Doc Loyalty exchange, I'd go for it (and how difficult will it be for them to decide that's a good thing? - they ether get Soc Psych and Doc Loyalty by 2147, or Soc Psych alone - only dimwits would choose the latter)
If they're not willing to dance with us on that one, I'd say "OK - the Junta regards this as a hostile act, so expect relations between our factions to become somewhat frosty"
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
Turn is currently with Morgan, so we'll have it soon
We want to be able to sell/trade Doc Loyalty to Zak, Lal and Morgan, the Gaians will want to sell/trade Social Psych and Doc Loyalty to the Angels
That seems a pretty fair swap to me.
But I still think (as with Ethical Calculus, that the G's - and in turn the A's, must agree not to build the CDF (whether we ourselves actually go about building it is moot, it's the principle that I think is important. )
If they research Soc Psych, Eth Calc and Doc Loyalty on their own, then get Int Int, of course they are totally free to build the CDF. If, however, they get to Int Int with a leg (or two) up from us, then it's prohibited to them (The "leg-up" that they give us, by providing Doc Loyalty, is, co course, valuable in and of itself, but not to the same extent. We might, for example, forswear building certain SP's that might be considered "Gaian-type" SP's such as the Xenodome and the Pholus Mutagen)
And Yang is 10 turns away from building the Command Nexus - we have time to steal it from under their noses if we want to delay our getting the MCC and CDF (But the gaians might try for the CN, so do we need to get a prohibiton on their - or the Angels - building that too? I say "Yes"
Thus I'd see the trade as:- We'll put Soc Psych, pre-accepted, on the table in 2146.
- Gaians open 2147 and accept it, change to Doc Loyalty, and send it to us pre-accepted.
- The Gaians undertake not to build the Command Nexus nor the Citizens Defense Force
- In consideration of which, Sparta undertakes not to build the Xenoempathy Dome nor the Pholus Mutagen
- The Gaians are free to trade Social Psych and Doc Loyalty to whomsoever they wish, but with the same prohibition on the recipient building the CN or the CDF (only wrt Doc Loyalty)
- We are free to trade Doc Loyalty to whomsoever we wish
(And this turn should we see if we can underbid the Gains in selling Social Psych to the Angels?)
Having said that, though, I also like the "common property" idea. If, say, the G's make 25 ec's from selling both Soc Psych and Doc Loyalty to the Angels, and we make, say, 25 each from Morgan, Zak and Lal, there'd be 125 ec's in the pool, with each entitled to 1/2 - so we'll give them 13 ec's (rounded) as their share. Any techs received in trade of either of those techs would be equally shared as well
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
It's all new (although Maniac has, in the Embassy, suggested that a Soc Psych for Doc Loyalty trade - with possible SP embargoes - might be in the works. (I believe he's asked for confirmation from them that they'll be able to switch to Doc layalty upon getting Soc Psych next turn.
So I'd give the Gaians the whole package (with the revenue sharing added)
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
- We'll put Soc Psych, pre-accepted, on the table in 2146.
- Gaians open 2147 and accept it, change to Doc Loyalty, and send it to us pre-accepted.
- The Gaians undertake not to build the Command Nexus nor the Citizens Defense Force
- In consideration of which, Sparta undertakes not to build the Xenoempathy Dome nor the Pholus Mutagen
- The Gaians are free to trade Social Psych and Doc Loyalty to whomsoever they wish, but with the same prohibition on the recipient building the CN or the CDF (only wrt Doc Loyalty)
- We are free to trade Doc Loyalty to whomsoever we wish
- Both techs will be treated as "common Property" so that any income - or additional techs - derived from their trading to 3rd parties will be shared equally between the Gaian Federation and the Spartan Federation
(thus, if the G's make, say, 25 ec's from selling both Soc Psych and Doc Loyalty to the Angels, and we make, say, 25 each from Morgan, Zak and Lal, there'd be 125 ec's in the pool, with each entitled to 1/2 - so Sparta would sent to the Gaians 13 ec's (rounded) as their share. Any techs received in trade of either of those techs would be equally shared as well) |
How much of this we expose to the Angels, though, I'm not sure. I'm expecting that they'll send Biogenetics, pre-accepted, to us, so that when I click "accept" they'll get Gene Splicing and we'll have Biogenetics. That might be enough for this turn, as if we go on a serious 3-way leapfrog towards Fusion or D:AP, it'll need quite some co-ordination among our 3 factions
(And in order to get Maniac's question answered, he might need to give someone on the Gaians side a primer on how the tech projector works - Darsnan, maybe, as he seems to be quite technically inclined)
Last edited by Googlie on 07-11-2004 at 20:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
Exactly
Almost tempting to let them stew in their own juice
But I guess Kassi logged out earlier today before he read my reply to his post above.
Why don't I just copy it to the Embassy, in his absence? (It's almost a perfect reply to Illuminatus' post there - perhaps expanded by a preamble "This is much more than simply a Soc Psych for Doc Loyalty deal")
Or Maniac, since you've posted already, prior to Illum's response, maybe you could post the full deal proposal, with the suggested preamble?
Last edited by Googlie on 07-11-2004 at 22:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
Why not send the big one (with the bullets - 7 or so posts above) It's a more liberal offer on our part and has a connotation of wanting to partner with them
(btw - I responded in the other Embassy thread re: the 5 or 6 years' embargo)
quote: Posted by Googlei in the Embassy
My Dear Lord Illuminatus:
Permit me, if I may, enter this discussion.
In 2141 the Gaians placed Industrial Base and Industrial Automation in the diplomatic tray, with a "negotiating" status. We reciprocated that same year with our technologies, under "accepted" status. The Gaians received these technologies upon opening the turn at the beginning of year 2142, and we received your technologies at the end of 2142, (we are last in turn order, and the year changes when we send the turn to the Gaians) Five years must elapse before the technology is free of any embargo. Therefore the years 2143, 2144, 2145, 2146 and 2147 must end before the embargo expires. Thus 2148 is the earliest that the Gaians can onward trade the technology. (of course, within our interpertation you would be within your rights to offer the technology in 2147 for ratification and acceptance by a third party in 2148, but not if offered in 2147 on a pre-accepted basis)
To argue otherwise is to introduce the element of Turn Order into any deals that have a term (as there are five other factions whose turns are played between the Gaians receiving a benefit and the Spartans receiving a commensurate benefit)
But we are pleased that you have seen fit, while disagreeing, to accept our interpretation in this instance. |
Don't know if that will mollify them a little or not
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|