 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
quote: quote:
That's a reflection of reality. There are two Americas. The coastal urban centres with a "progressive" culture and interior with "traditional" culture. |
I have heard you spout this idiotic myth based on nothing many a time, what exactly is its origin? |
Do you not even know your own country? Look at your national voting pattern and then look at who votes republican vs those who vote democrats. The republicans do better in interior states while democrats do better in coastal states (west coast and northeast US). These voting patterns reflect different cultural values.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Which is a very odd statement, given that the colonies spoke much better English in general than the English did, and that even the worst Southern accent is really a preservation of seventeenth-century English.
It was England that started really changing the language, after the break with the colonies. |
How do you definite "better English"?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
It is part of their identity. Besides, languages are richness. The more you can speak, the more you can communicate. They sound different and sound nice. They're just different protocols, but more important. |
Languages can affect how we think, particularly written language.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:21
|
|
It was uniform? So how does he explain the difference in accents between Boston, New York and Atlanta?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:21
|
|
I don't know if it was more uniformed back then, but assuming it was how does that prove the theory that colonial American English was better?
Last edited by Tingkai on 09-10-2004 at 21:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: One of the lessons of the Roman Empire is that one language and one culture were good. |
I thought the Romans in the eastern half of the empire used mostly Greek and not Latin.
Having a common language for business is a good thing. Forcing people to use that language everyday would be bad, but I can't see anyone promoting that today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tingkai
I don't know if it was more uniformed back then, but assuming it was how that prove to the theory that colonial American English was better? |
I'm repeating the comments of Englishmen and Americans at the time.
Besides, if American speech is more uniform, in general it will be better.
As another example, the speaking was clearer (American English emphasized, for one thing, actually sounding out syllables when learning to read - that's an American invention).
An example: Rev. John Witherspoon (came from Scotland to become the first president of Princeton): "The vulgar in America speak much better than the vulgar in Great-Britain, for a very obvious reason, viz. that being much more unsettled, and moving frequently from place to place, they are not so liable to local peculiarities either in accent or phraseology. There is a greater difference in dialect between one county and another in Britain, than there is between one state and another in America."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:21
|
|
Surely, in the modern age of literacy, learning a second language is possible without destroying the primary language. This just proves the point that Chirac's fear that the world is choking on American values is absurd at best and borders on willful delusion.
quote: Do you not even know your own country? Look at your national voting pattern and then look at who votes republican vs those who vote democrats. The republicans do better in interior states while democrats do better in coastal states (west coast and northeast US). These voting patterns reflect different cultural values. |
Please note that there are lots of very large cities in the interior of the country. Also note that most Americans live in suburbs, not inner cities. So, for instance, the metropolitan Houston and Dallas areas -- among the largest cities and most modern in the US -- are strong Republican.
Last edited by DanS on 09-10-2004 at 21:50
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|