 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: techniques behind Hollywood movies are directly aimed at pleasing a viewer with moral and psychological tricks, and are miles away from encouraging free thinking, artistic research and the likes. |
I see we've never seen a Hitchcock movie. The 'thinking' movies are mostly out of vogue (though they still exist) because people in the US want to go to the movies to have fun, not think too much, they do that in their jobs.
As for the market tending towards uniformity... that must be why I only eat burgers every day... oh wait, I had Chinese the other night, and Pizza before that, and Mexican last week. Vietnamese a few weeks ago. Perhaps I'll go for Thai, and if I liked Indian, I could get it any time I wanted. All within driving distance. That's not mentioning Japanese (been a while since I've been there), Morroccan and Ethopian foods I can get at any time.
What uniformity?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
No, when an oligopoly becomes so strong and stuck up that people can't even want something because of a lack of exposure, then the government should act to make a particular market more free-flowing. |
Of course you can want it. Obviously you haven't been afflicted by this, otherwise you wouldn't think there was a problem (and there wouldn't be). So that's clearly not the case. In addition, by your logic the government must fund exposure to each and every conceivable form of culture possible, so that everyone has a full range to choose from. That's just stupid. If you really want to look for something else, there's plenty of stuff on the web, or you can even use your own money - imagine that, not being able to use someone else's money - to go and find it.
It's like complaining that there aren't any good games in a particular genre because no one buys that type of game, and then demanding that the government fund development of that type of game and restrict the development of other types.
quote: Anti-trust legislation does exist and I doubt that you disagree with it. Culture can be administered with similar intents in mind but the government should give itself broader freedom in this regard, because culture can be determined not only by who sells it but also by more larger patterns of genre, origin, etc. |
The problem isn't a monopoly, the problem is no one cares about your stupid culture! They're all happy to adopt ours! It's not our fault your own people don't like your culture as much as they like ours, it's yours. Why the hell should the government prop up anything that is failing for the sole reason that no one wants what it's selling?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:21
|
|
Right, my apologies for my first rant in this thread. It wasn't very constructive and it was a bit racist 
the no AC and no elevator thing is not very cultural thing anyway. And after all this was a bout movies and other kind of cultural influences.
Just for the records, our theaters do play other movies too than Hollywood movies. Hollywood movies are their own genre, just like French movies and domestic ones. I like them all. Hollywood.. you can't compare it to other genres. Because they are different genres in a way. Hollywood usually has good production, and all that good stuff. And they make lot of movies too and promote them more aggresively. Of course there is nothing wrong in that. But Hollywood movies ARE made more for the American audience than others. And of course they are, would be pretty stupid if they weren't. Other 'genres' like French films (well these are not official genres), UK films etc etc, they have their own style. Smaller production, but good production values. Usually more subtle, and it's not so much to your face action type of films. But they are different genres. Doesn't make the other one any worse or better. I like them all, if I like them. It's not because it's Hollywood, or Swedish or what ever.
And on the contrary too, non-Hollywood movies are made, and in big numbers too. They do get lot of time in our theaters too, because they are succesful in here. Some of these films would never be succesful in the US. So they don't even bother trying it. Just like the 'man without past' created some interest even in the US, but the fact is, Kaurismäki has made those kinds of films for years and years and years, and we are very familiar with them and even before this one he was considered as a legend and many of his cinematographical displays of our lives and the weird dialogues and most of all the lack of them are famous in here and there are many sayings that are known like 'Oh this is just like from Kaurismäki' if you'd enter a weird situaton where no one talks and it's just generally weird. But still common .
These movies are good for us, and there are lots of them. The thing is, they are nto succesful in the US because you guys are not into that kind of stuff. So you might get an idea that no one else is making films, which is of course pretty weird though
And hell yes that is seen as arrogant, because we know we have films all the time, it is you who don't get to see them . It's like the claim that no one else is making music. Or popular music. that's crap claim too, they might not be popular there. Some bands, some films, what ever the format is, have been usually extremely popular in their own countries and areas for years and years and years, and some of them break it in the US as well, and suddenly 'hey one foreigner made a film too' .
Get it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|