 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Yeah, and ironically now despite state religions or whatever the church and religious extremists have much more influence on your politics than ours. |
Again, our system is not designed to limit the influence of religion on the state. It's designed to limit the influence of the state on religion.
This isn't tough stuff. I wonder why I have to keep explaining it to you lot.
Edit: Atheists have much more to fear from your system than ours, just as fringe religions have much more to fear from your system than ours.
Last edited by DanS on 21-10-2004 at 19:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Yes, thqt's what I read. I don't remember the main story being about an "uproar" (at least the way I understand it, i.e the public opinion being widely shocked - I would classify, for example, the French overreaction to headscarves as "uproar" in my vocabulary).
I just saw that a guy had a position completely opposite to that of the mainstream EU-Parliament, and who was politically shot-down by the EU-Parli.
If it was an anti-competition commie who was proposed (and politically shot down, because this legislature is very favourable to free-markets), would you have said that the EU persecutes commies? |
OK, no uproar then. But that is not my point. The point of my question becomes this:
Is it true that the EU holds a position that the primary purpose for a family is something other than providing protection (in the form of a wage-earning father, etc.) for a women to raise children?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|