 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
Equality is a broad concept.
Liberals are against the idea of inequality of persons, but tolerant of specific inequalities insofar as they raise the welfare of the worst off. That is the core idea of liberal justice - it is grounded in the equality of persons.
|
I call this a lot of bull. Liberals are enormously intollerant of economic inequality and show this in almost everything they say or do. It is Republicans who advocate equal opportunity, quality education for all, equality before the law, etc. It is Democrats who are for demonizing the so-called rich, arguing class warfare endlessly, advocating steep progressive taxation and confiscatory estate taxes, and, if they could do it, total regulation of business for the "welfare" of the people (as proposed by Dean).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:19
|
|
Che, che... 
Don't you notice that 96% of all "righties" on this board are mostly silent on the political issues? Oh, you have your Ned's and Fez's, loud as they can be, but me, Ming, Rah, DanS, Adam Smith...etc. tend to stay out of the ideology threads, where people do nothing but compare Holy Writ to Holy Writ.
We've got better things to do, you see. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zkribbler
|
 |
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Feb 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Zkribbler, that is not what Agathon said. He said "equality" in the sense that socialism defines equality: economic equality. |
No, what he said was:
quote:
Originally posted by Agathon
In other news Saskatchewan has just legalized gay marriage.
It's sort of funny that Liberals are being accused of looking down on people, since that is merely a contingent feature of Liberalism. Liberalism is founded upon equality and holds in low regard (i.e. treats as unequal) views that promote inequality. This is a contingent matter, if there was nobody holding such views, the attitude would vanish.
On the other hand, inequality is essential to conservatism. Conservatives, whether they like to admit it or not, always have to have some group to hold in contempt due to their love of status hierarchies. It really doesn't matter who they are, yesterday it was blacks, now it's gays, tomorrow who knows? |
He's talking about socal equality. There ain't a dollar sign in that statement anywhere. And, he's talking about liberalism, not socialism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Oops... looks like it got deleted. My apologies.
According to the thread, the boards pessimists are:
UberKrux
civman2000
Tripledoc
Osweld
Oncle Boris
Odin
Monkspider
Spiffor
Dissident
Shi (not a Lefty, but then, very few things are 100%).
Verres
Sava
Optimists:
Urban Ranger (not a Righty, but then, very few things are 100%).
Ogie Oglethorpe
JohnT
Drogue
Boshko
Again, we didn't vote in droves... probably that "we've got better things to do" thing again. 
However, the trend is unmistakable. Lefties tend to be pessimistic, Righties tend to be optimistic. The question now is, which came first: the attitude or the ideology? My guess would be the attitude. |
wow, what a scientific study you did there!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bosh
|
 |
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
You mean like this one AH? Amusing as all hell, but not terribly effective rhetoric:
quote:
by Janet Sullivan
By the time I had gone to bed, the chorus of pundits had fixed on a single tune, as they always do, and remarkably quickly, too. (Do they watch one another's feeds in the green room?) They had dusted off the old theme that the Democrats need to "reach out" more to the "heartland." Reach out? How, exactly? Forget that these folks blindly ignored all objective reality -- and their own best economic and national-security interests -- and voted for Bush. Look what they did at the Senate level. In Kentucky, they refused to use even basic sanity as a litmus test, and reelected a guy with apparent late-stage dementia; in Oklahoma, they tapped a fellow who wants to execute doctors who perform abortions, who was sued for sterilizing a woman against her will, who pled guilty to Medicaid fraud, and who largely opposes federal subsidies, even for his own state; in Louisiana, they embraced a man who has made back-door deals with David Duke and who was revealed to have had a long-running affair with a prostitute; in South Carolina, they went with a guy who thinks all gay teachers should be fired; and in Alaska, they reelected a woman who was appointed by her father to the job after a spectacularly undistinguished career as an obscure state senator. And compared with the rest of the GOP Class of '04, she's the freaking prom queen. These are the stellar elected officials that the "heartland" has foisted on the rest of us.
"Reach out" to these voters? Yeah. Then boil your hand till it's sterilized.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|