 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
quote: Basically, BAR used a small "retaining device" in their fuel system, that could be used to hold some fuel. When only the fuel tank was empty, the car was above minimal weight. When both the tank and this device were emptied of fuel, the car was underweight. |
Wow. Interesting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
It just sounds like an incredibly stupid gamble to make.
Also: I wonder if this could have been done without Honda's knowledge.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
I agree with Button not deserving this.
I read somewhere that 2 former BAR engineers notified some of the other teams about the situation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vovan
|
|
Woah... The plot thickens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
Rahter boring race. Absence of Button and Sato really felt.
Too bad for Michael, with the bad luck.
Good overtake by Fisichella of Webber near the end.
What else? A couple of quasi-duels between team members.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Alex
|
 |
Brasil
Mar 1999 time: 02:34
|
|
Not the most exciting race, I agree.
Surely Raikkonen deserved the victory, he was absolutely great in the race. I hardly could believe when he had more than 20 secs over Alonso, and he maintained a good pace during all the event.
Alonso was somehow disappointing, but if he had problems with his car, the second place was still a strong finishing position for him.
Trulli and Ralf were good too, Toyota seems to improve with every race, kind of like what happened to BAR last season. Let's hope they don't have any dirty tricks under the hood... 
Montoya 
Webber and Heidfeld were mediocre... I really can't see Williams as a serious contender now.
Schumi was good during the first half of the race, and it seemed like he could do something similar to what he did at Imola, but the horrible Bridgestone tyres are really making things bad for Ferrari this year.
All in all, I expected more from this race. Next is Monaco, which is a very peculiar race, one that is usually decided in the qualifying sessions. And Ferrari is not good at qualifying, as we have seen so far. McLaren and Renault (and Toyota) are the teams which are going to fight for victory at Monaco.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
Monte Carlo prediction:
1. Alonso
2. Fisichella
3. Trulli
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
Apparently Ferrari still has reliability and tyre problems. I'll say:
1. Alonso
2. Fisichella
3. Trulli
I'm betting that Raikonnen's car won't last the race, otherwise i'd have him in first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
Apparently, BAR knew that 3 other teams used the same fuel system that they used at Imola. The 4 teams use the same manufacturer for their fueling systems: ATL. And the 3 other teams listed in ATL's catalog are Jordan, McLaren and Ferrari.
BAR was ready to file a protest against each of the other Team's cars after Imola, but since they were cleared at first, they decided not to. Then, when the decision was appealed and taken to the FIA, it was too late for BAR to file a protest.
I'll try and find something to back this up.
Last edited by Richelieu on 10-05-2005 at 05:01
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thorgal
|
|
Tarifa, Cádiz.
Jan 2002 time: 05:34
|
|
In Monte Carlo the car (the chasis much more than the engine) and the driver are in fact important, so:
1-Alonso
2-Trulli
3-Schumi
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
People you are disregarding the fact that it is very likely Montoya and a large number of Schumachers are going to crash into a wall at some point. Schumi has to race like hell, no way he finishes the race. He'll probably crash into Webber and then order the box to put bananas in Barichello's exhaust ... again. He's a bad loser that guy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thorgal
|
|
Tarifa, Cádiz.
Jan 2002 time: 05:34
|
|
Yep, but he was a bad loser even a cheater at some point when he was younger and had something to win. Right now he has won everything, so it seems he has become a much nicer guy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Richelieu
Apparently, BAR knew that 3 other teams used the same fuel system that they used at Imola. The 4 teams use the same manufacturer for their fueling systems: ATL. And the 3 other teams listed in ATL's catalog are Jordan, McLaren and Ferrari.
BAR was ready to file a protest against each of the other Team's cars after Imola, but since they were cleared at first, they decided not to. Then, when the decision was appealed and taken to the FIA, it was too late for BAR to file a protest.
I'll try and find something to back this up. |
Couldn't find anything. Thin air.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|