 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Immortal Wombat
No, for that I'd need a young and attractive bumchum, the bestest car in the whole world, the spiffiest mp3 player money can buy, impeccable taste in fashion, music, and gadgetry, a small trolley to carry my ego around in, and for everyone else to be doing worse than me in every respect as well.
But the salary would be a start. |
Your first step would be to move out of the UK, to somewhere you can actually make money and improve your droll sense of humour. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
sure....
on another note, I believe that Engineering PHDs start at ~100k..
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Actually, it makes sense in so far as the degree ends up being a professional degree- Chemical engineering is about as far as you need to go, and in reality, what you learn in Law school requires no previous undergrad degree. That law schools in the US, as opposed to most of the world expect one to study beforehand something else does not remove the fact that these are similar levels of eduction.
So in fact Law and Medicine shoul be included in such a list for it to be comparable. |
Nonsense, as they require a lot more schooling.
You have very perverse logic. Which is to be expected of an arts grad, of course. 
You don't think graduate-level engineers demand a far higher salary? As someone who knows quite a few engineers with Masters or even PhD, I'll tell you they do command a higher salary. Not just the ones who become professors, but the ones who, say, work at IBM's Software Lab in Toronto...
Having a Masters or PhD significantly affects your salary, and position, fairly heavily.
This is a 4-year Bachelor's degree comparison. That is all. It makes no sense to include Law in such a list, and it says a lot about this list's correlation with intelligence that you would try to argue that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
only 30%?
I know that there were starting jobs avaiable for physics/endgineering PHDs doing industry for 100k in 2000
maybe that has droped a bit, and maybe that wasn't the average, but they existed at that point in time
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
A law degree isn't even a masters.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Verres
|
 |
Swimming with the mermaids...
Aug 2003 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
There is also a correlation between "intelligence" and expected earnings. |
I think there are too many exceptions to that rule for it to be taken seriously.
My plumber earns a lot more than I probably ever will - yet he is dense, no two ways about it. I'm not talking about the extent of his knowledge, I mean his ability to grasp new concepts, conduct a decent conversation, generally get on in life.
Same with my hairdresser. I don't mind him charging me £150+ each time I go because he is amazing at his job, yet trying to talk to him is positively infuriating.
It could be said, I suppose, that an intelligent person will choose a degree/job most likely to ge them a secure job, and one with high wages. But such generalisations with regard to IQ or whatever other measurement of intelligence is being used, and whether the person is more inclined to science or arts is.....well, mostly insulting, but I refuse to believe the most 'intelligent' people the world has produced thus far were all into chemical engineering.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KrazyHorse
|
 |
Macedonia
May 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Verres
I think there are too many exceptions to that rule for it to be taken seriously.
My plumber earns a lot more than I probably ever will - yet he is dense, no two ways about it. I'm not talking about the extent of his knowledge, I mean his ability to grasp new concepts, conduct a decent conversation, generally get on in life.
Same with my hairdresser. I don't mind him charging me £150+ each time I go because he is amazing at his job, yet trying to talk to him is positively infuriating.
It could be said, I suppose, that an intelligent person will choose a degree/job most likely to ge them a secure job, and one with high wages. But such generalisations with regard to IQ or whatever other measurement of intelligence is being used, and whether the person is more inclined to science or arts is.....well, mostly insulting, but I refuse to believe the most 'intelligent' people the world has produced thus far were all into chemical engineering. |
Are you being deliberately thick?
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Statis...orrelation.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|