 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:14
|
|
i have this problem: even on light mode, when a thread spans multiple pages, i don't always get to read the entire thread. why? because when a page loads, most of the time it will cut off in the middle of the thread, so get to read maybe the first 20 posts and then can't read anything below it, including the next 20 and the lower navigation buttons.
i can't tell you how irritating this is, particularly because the only way i can get the full page after that is to clear the browser's memory and disk caches, stopping every other use of bandwidth, and then crossing my fingers.
i tell you, it's caused a significant hit on my enjoyment of the forums, particularly because i can't browse using multiple windows anymore.
and it happens to me on all three major browsers (netscrap, flopera, and ai-eeeee) on a sweet earthlink 56k connection.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
We have some problems with "condensed" threads (an example: "Info: diplomats and spies" thread)
1. May the size limit of a post be increased?
2. May the size limit of an attachements be increased?
3. Can I add an attachement to a post with no attachement or to a post which attachement was deleted?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:14
|
|
Thank you for a good job with this upgrade.
(now for the ungrateful whiny user part)
I too am having problems with the forum pages being extended beyond the screen width; not perhaps to as great an extent as SnowFire's earlier post, but annoying nonetheless. I see much white space in the thread titles column and still need to scroll to the right to read the last post(er) time (nice info). Unlike SnowFire, I haven't seen any obvious long topics causing this to happen, but it could be in some old thread perhaps. Wrapping of long topics would be a good fix if that is the problem. Naturally, I did not find consolation in your reply to him: "it wraps for me".
I sometimes have an invisible cursor in the reply page; even at best, it is flickery and kinda thin, but when it is missing, it is a real pain to post. The totally missing cursor seems to be related to being low on sys resources as in having SMAC loaded at the same time as I'm on line, but I'd like to think that we could have greater expectations of the upgraded system than the old one (which could handle this). As you might imagine, even a big obnoxious cursor would be better than nothing.
I like the inclusioin of the spell checker, but I am reluctant to check the *don't show me this again* boxes on the *you are about to send ... over the internet* messages as they seem to apply to the "internet zone". If you don't check it, you get a couple of those boxes for each suspect word plus a few more for good measure. I could check it, but I am otherwise happy with this security level in general (just a few CRs added onto each search query), but there are too many in a typical spell check, especially with game jargon and abbr. included. It would be nice if you said that checking the box would have no effect outside this spell checker, but you'd have to mean it.
This is probably a temporary thing and you probably know it already, but in case you don't, today I've been getting recurring messages about one of the ad banners not getting loaded (the one that's not Chips & Bits apparently).
Is it really true that there is no way to uncheck the Show Sig box by default?
Thanks again for all the hard work that must have gone into this change. (this graphic is a nice idea, but a little bland maybe?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|