 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
Then that's what they should lobby for. Playing victim for something that they were never directly affected by, and seeking retribution from individuals who are not directly responsible for it, will only succeed in doing one thing as far as I'm concerned: pissing me off. |
You're a smart guy. You know damned well if they lobbied for that, they'd never it get. They'd have to settle for something far less. That's why they've got to try to shoot the moon here.
And, once again--they were affected. They never benefited from the wealth that was owed their ancestors. And, they're not seeking retribution from individuals who are not directly responsible for it. They're seeking reparations from those companies that did not pay their ancestors what they were owed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
You got a source for that? Not that I'm saying you're wrong...but sounds a bit off. |
US Census Bureau estimates... archives. They have the next batch going up next month. Here's where I got 68,000:
http://eire.census.gov/popest/archi.../intfile2-1.txt
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
Wow. Now you've REALLY lost me. What the hell are you trying to say? |
You said you didnt want to go there. I took that to mean you didnt want to continue the discussion. If everyone who supports reparations for slavery would stop discussing it that would be great.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Caligastia
You said you didnt want to go there. I took that to mean you didnt want to continue the discussion. If everyone who supports reparations for slavery would stop discussing it that would be great. |
No. I said I wasn't following you. Meaning, I didn't have any clue what the hell you were trying to say. So try again, Sparky.
Splitting hairs? Maybe. But you can't deny that there is a much stronger link within these companies than there is between the African leaders then and the African leaders now.
Besides, it was the companies who profited from the work these slaves did. Shouldn't the companies pay for that work?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I heard an interesting take on this today. A lawyer was discussing the civil case and he mentioned that a jury could opt for "restoration" vs restitution. You could restore the descendents of slaves to the conditions they would exist in if their ancestors had not been slaves. All it would take is a bunch of one way airline tickets.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
Besides, it was the companies who profited from the work these slaves did. Shouldn't the companies pay for that work? |
Companies are made up of people. People who did not own slaves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
WhiteElephants
|
 |
Toledo Ohio
Mar 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
I wonder if Mike Tyson would get some of this money, or say, Oprah Winfrey, Halle Berri, Tiger Woods, Denzel Washington, Colon Powell, Michael Jordan, etc, etc.
I wonder what is more efffective -- picking yourself up by the boot straps, or pissing and moaning about ancient history?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
It's hard to pick yourself up by your bootstraps when you can't afford shoes, WE.
Look, all I'm saying is that if people can prove that they are the direct descendants of people who were slaves, and the work of those slaves enriched those corporations, then those companies should be made to pay those descendants.
Not every black person. Not only black people. Anyone who can prove that they came from those slaves. The closer the relation, the more money. The more ancestors who were the slaves in question, the more money. EDIT: I should state that I know this is not the basis of the lawsuit, or at least it doesn't appear so at this point. However, that is what *I* believe would be fair.
DD, as to the ex post facto laws... was it illegal under the Nazi regime for them to rob the Jews?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tuberski
Once again, even though you may be correct, I point out that they live better lives here than if slavery hadn't happened.
Do you argue this? |
No. But by the same token, don't they, for the most part, live worse lives than other people who came to the continent during the same period?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
It's hard to pick yourself up by your bootstraps when you can't afford shoes, WE.
Look, all I'm saying is that if people can prove that they are the direct descendants of people who were slaves, and the work of those slaves enriched those corporations, then those companies should be made to pay those descendants.
Not every black person. Not only black people. Anyone who can prove that they came from those slaves. The closer the relation, the more money. The more ancestors who were the slaves in question, the more money. EDIT: I should state that I know this is not the basis of the lawsuit, or at least it doesn't appear so at this point. However, that is what *I* believe would be fair.
DD, as to the ex post facto laws... was it illegal under the Nazi regime for them to rob the Jews? |
Not that is a reperation plan that actually makes sense. Now only if black leaders were that smart .
A question I have is what are some of the companies that have benefit (just curious, not picking a fight or anything ).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|