 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
In any war, you attack an enemy at his weak point. The IDF is far too strong to be combatted directly, so the only option left is to take the war to its supporters. |
POPPYCOCK! You automatically *assume* that those civilians slaughtered by terrorist suicide bombers back all of Israel's actions?!
Such hubris, Chegitz!
I guess that means the 3000 or so people slaughtered on Sept. 11, 2001 were supporters of the U.S. government's policies overseas and, thus, deserved to die 'cause poor jackass baby Osama **** HEAD Laden didn't have enough balls to try and take out another U.S. military target. Oh, wait, he DID! He took out part of the Pentagon with an airliner filled with ... you guessed it! Supporters of America's evil foreign policies! (Translation: civilians.)
Has it ever crossed your mind, Chegitz (and all you other folks that have similar thoughts) that maybe, just maybe, some of those cold-blooded vampires worthy of death by fire, er, civilians, may have been supportive to one degree or another of the agendas albeit w/o the violence of those who killed them? That maybe they wanted peace in the Middle East? That maybe they contributed dollars to aid groups in Israel, Afghanistan and Palestine?
All for naught! They're dead! Killed at the hands of those jackasses who deliberately targeted them because, woes them, they couldn't take on the IDF or America's horrible "fire from the sky" air force.
DanS' post was spot on. Yours sounds ... hmm ... cold-blooded Stalinish?
quote: It is completely hypocritical for Americans to decry the horrors of suicide bombers while it was applauding the complete destruction of the civilian infrastructures of Iraq and Yugoslavia. Feh! A suicide bobmer has nothing on American death from the skies. |
Yeah, you read me right, Commie-boy. I just dance and sing whenever our armed forces go into action. Oh, sorry for the stereotyping. I'm just mimicking you. Higher thought with you in this particular case isn't worth burning calories on.
So just what is your definition of a civilian structure, Chegitz? Must be a missile battery in the case of Iraq, right? A strategic bridge for the former Yugoslavia? Whoops, I lied. I had to waste a few calories to ask you those questions, Chegitz. My apologies, son. As you were!
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
They don't take it in the US. While Chris claims that the US media is ignoring the attacks in Jewish temples and Jews in Europe, I've seen and heard far more news about that then about the executed Palestinian policemen or the dead priest. You cannot get reliable news about what Israel is doing in the American media, only about what the Palestinians have done. It paints an exceedingly one sided picture. There are a number of reasons why this is so, which I shan't go into, but it's not because of Jewish control of the media. |
**ROTFLMAO** Hey, is this the same American media that the Israeli government is threatening to kick out of Ramallah because we're not following IDF military rules regarding censorship?!
Hey, is this the same American media where one of our reporters got shot through the shoulder by an Israeli military unit?
Yeah, we love Israel so much that we deliberately paint a one-sided picture just so folks like you, Chegitz, can sit behind your computer and spout about how dreadfully one-sided we are.
**blam!!**
GODDANG IT! Stop shooting at us, Israel! See our press passes? SHEESH!!! I tell ya! Whelp, time to sit down and write that Israeli propaganda piece that Mr. Sharon wants in an hour!
Gatekeeper 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Or lord... if our newspapers weren't a laughing stock already, all they need is poetry . |
Well, I understand that the state- and religious-sponsored "news"papers especially those in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon are chock full of reliable information. Why, just a few weeks ago I hear there was a piece regarding how Jews need the blood of non-Jews (preferably children, right) to make some sort of food? Do you want a subscription, Imran? I'm just *positive* they can carry real news better than any mainstream American paper, right?
**blam**
GODDANG IT, ISRAEL!!!! **waves press pass** Hey, this ain't a gun, guys! Stop shooting at me!
Gatekeeper 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
And Gatekeeper, if you DON'T think the US media is blatently pro-Israel, you really aren't paying attention. Check out the American media v. European media or any other free media in the world. |
Imran, you're talking to one of the people who gets the stories directly from our frontline people on the ground across the world's hot spots. Hard news, Imran, not that stuff you and some others seem to equate as representative of the media: op-ed.
Hard news is that stuff generally found on the pages other than op-ed, Imran. Also, TV programs such as "Crossfire," "The Point" and Bill O'Reilly generally aren't considered founts of "hard news," Imran, as they're op-ed and mean to piss some people off while turning others into zombies (Limbaugh comes to mind here). Hard news where *I* work, along with about 96 percent of the media types you never see on-screen (trenches, ya know) is the unglamorous stuff because it's "the facts only, ma'am." Unfortunately, some folks seem to think the op-ed pages and TV shows represent the media and everyone in the profession.
They DO NOT. So when I speak of the work I do, it's most certainly not from the viewpoint of an op-ed guy. The news, hell the only news I work with, is the hard stuff.
So if the U.S. media is "blatently pro-Israel," you'll have to take that up with the "lords" of the profession, not me. I'm still in the trenches, putting out and arranging that unglamorous "facts only" copy that comes in direct from the hotspots. So I do pay attention, Imran, to the 96 percent of the media that affects me: hard news.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: I'm just *positive* they can carry real news better than any mainstream American paper, right? |
You know there is this big continent... yah.. meet Europe.. and over here... yes, that's Australia.  |
I believe the part of the world I was talking about which you left out of my quote was in regards to the "news"papers that are government- and religious-sponsored founts of "information" in the likes of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon and whatnot. So what's your point of including geopolitical and geographical data outside that area, Imran? You were/are whining and moaning about bias in the U.S. media ... heck, I thought I'd do you a favor and point you in the direction of the "news" coverage you must truly want since America's big, bad media are soooooo pro-Israel.
quote:
quote: Imran, you're talking to one of the people who gets the stories directly from our frontline people on the ground across the world's hot spots. Hard news, Imran, not that stuff you and some others seem to equate as representative of the media: op-ed. |
I'm talking headlines and stories on the front page (and beyond). They ain't op-ed, and they definetly back Israel more than any other Western source I've seen. |
Judging from your contributions on this thread so far, Imran, I can only take your rants and raves in regards to the media and Israel with this: 
quote: I hardly read op-ed, buddy. I'm commenting on the regular news with the subtle bias. The pro-Israel bias is very obvious to posters from Europe or Aussie-land (and I mean NON-OP-ED). |
Well, gee gosh golly whillikers, Imran! Just like the pro-Palestinian bias is soooo evident in European media to non-Europeans, eh? People want to see things, Imran, and they will go digging to great, great depths in order to find what they want to see. You wanted to see a pro-Israel bias in the hard news pages, Imran, well you found it! Oh, look! Jim Bob over there wants to find the pro-liberal bias in American papers! He found it! Hey! John Q. Public wanted to find the right-wing corporate control of the American media! He found it on Page A7!!!!
AUGH!!!
Gatekeeper
(P.S. Roland ... I share your curiosity in regards to the stripper mayor. That was "top news" because this is a case where "entertainment" journalists got their way and put up something that would obviously draw some interest. It's not easy to say this, but there are people out there who really don't care for world events, even if it means their son or daughter might be the next ones shipped out to some hotspot somewhere.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:18
|
|
Another anti-semitic attack in Antwerp. Molotovs were thrown on a Synagogue.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|