 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
Not at all, it's the verdict of History, Islam has consistantly attacked it's non-Islamic neibhors through out history, in fact, the Black slave trade in Africa was intiated by Islam.Yes, lets.
No, Mohammed claims that God spoke to him as his last prophet, and added the clever device of saying that he was the last such prohit, so he could never be corected or changed.
His notion was to disreguard all of the new testatment to be replaced by his teachings, the Koran.
You don't know what you talking about, western Rome fell in the 5th century, Mohammed comes in the 8th century, unless the Islamics had a time machine. 
Which has nothing to do with the topic.
You might add that they were allowed to live in a Muslim state by paying THREE times the taxes of other citizens, a non-Islamic tax.
The Christians considered them colaberators (and they are also crazy, but that's another story) so had no problem killing them.
We are talking about the biggest bastards in history, they fit the bill.
The thread isn't about the possitives, it's about the biggest bastards in History, Islam is it by every criteria you care to name.
Oh, and every British monarch and government were exactly the same?
Talk about generalizations. |
I never said that Islam rose at the same period that the Roman Empire fell. You put words in my mouth.
For centuries after the Roman Empire fell, the Catholic monasteries, and then later, the Islamic cities, preserved the heritage from ancient Greece and ancient Rome.
And you bet that Islam was definitely inspired partially by Christianity, in that Mohhamed saw himself as the continuation, as well as the last, prophet going back to Judahism and Christianity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
Common misconception, Mongol rule was neither oppressive or criminal, in fact, they oppened trade routes to Europe and the west long closed in their brief span of pre-eminence.
|
They didn't rule all that long. Its the way they murdered their way to empire that gets them that rep I would suppose.
Just ask the dead in city after after city that the Mongols sacked just how unoppressive they were. Millions dead. Hundreds of thousands in Damascus alone. Very unpleasant people even by the standards of Empires over history.
I voted for Russia myself. Pretty nasty under both the Tsars and the Communists. Hard to beat 30 million deaths under Stalin alone.
The Spaniards had unexpected help in their slaughtering. Much of it was unintended. They didn't plan on killing the vast majority of the Amerinds with Small Pox.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
The total of native Americans in 1492 is roughly estimated at one million.
The Mongols killed three million in the Korezim Empire alone! |
Where the heck did you get that ludicrous number for the Amerinds. I don't know about1492 but there is no way the one million in all the Americas became a vastly huger number by the time Cortez arived in Mexico. Mexico alone is estimated to have had 25 million at that time. One hundred years later it was down to one million. Mostly due to small pox.
However its true the Mongols were intentionly killing by the millions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
I'm annoyed by the "scared cow" attitude I see by posters toward the Islamic world, this seems a reflection of the modern era.
I stand by what i said, for pure human misery, look no further then those carring a cresent to battle, they brought wars of conquest to three coninents in a very short span.
Not all christan states disallowed such things.
I never said these guys were sweatharts.
Actually, you can continue it foward, but they couldn't compete with Europe on a military bases from about 1600, but not from a lack of trying.
Pure nonsense, a massive generalization.
Most of the preserved works of anciet Greeks comes from the Monisteris, not Muslims sources, and those monistaries were Christian.
Not a matter of spreading, outside of the americas it never really caught on in Asia or Africa.
T1t-for-tat semantics.
If you want who was first to attack, the honor falls to Islam.
I merely stated my opinion, and was bombarded with nonsense.
I'm called a bigot for my pick, what hypocracy! 
People should try to keep personal feelings out of such discussions, or don't waste my time. |
I must say I disagree with you
Africa is very christian (not 100% but still)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Chris 62
|
 |
But I'm feeling MUCH better now
Jan 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Transcend
So be it. If you can only resolve to insults and lies, then I really pity you. Maybe you are under too much stress, how about seeing a psychiatrist? | Your not to smart, are you?
Did you even look at the provided material?
Do you have a clue about Islamic history?
Obviously not.
Someday when you grow up you might.
quote: Originally posted by poly's #1 Islamic appolgist
And here I thought that you defended Israel because you were morally opposed to terrorism, and now I find you are a anti-Islamic bigot that even argues facts that most historians agree upon (ie, most of Western learning owes a great debt to Islamic saving of Roman and Greek texts). | I find many things about Islam interesting and of importance, but because I recognize them for what they are does not make me a bigot.
If you took those blinders off you might see it also.
I have no idea why many people here want to bend over and give islam a big kiss on the backside, but I never will.
For all their fine accomplishments they left a blood trail miles wide with a history of aggression and intolernce they extends to this day.
It seems in vogue today to blame Europe and America for the world's problems, and theiren lies Islam's number one problem, and inability to look truthfully at it's past and what it wants, and to blame it's problems on others.
Your the perfect example Imran, and educated man, yet you turn your back on knowledge and fall into retoric and falsehood when anything that shows a bad light on Islam is brought up.
You are the perfect example of what is symptamatic of Islam, blame others for your own short comings, and turn nelson's blind eye to the truth of history.
Transcend is just a fool, so we need not concern ourselves with him, but you should know better.
quote: I think Peacemaker in context to CBS league was right after all. | Yet you thought differently before I dared question Islam.
Shows a lot about your character, or rather, lack of it.
Since Trancend knows so little, I'll hook him up with some sites, which are easy to find BTW, a few clicks on goggle.
A short primer on the arab conquests:
http://w1.xrefer.com/entry/209905
A nice overview of the Ottomans:
http://www.naqshbandi.org/ottomans/history.htm
The effects of Ottoman rule on Albania:
http://www.albanian.com/main/history/ottoman.html
A view of Islamic conquest not white-washed through muslim sources:
http://www.secularislam.org/jihad/
The Muhgul (islamic) conquest of India:
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/MUGHAL/MUGHAL.HTM
A site about military operations in the Balkans in the early Ottoman days:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/balkandave/wbmedivl.htm
Again, the net has many such sites, all there to look at.
So spare the Islam was peaceful riff, it's bullsh1t, as was Imran's claim that I'm a bigot because I see through this bull.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
I say China, just because of the question, throughout history. The Chinese have been around twice as long s any other civilization, thus they've had twice the time to be bastards.
After that, it would be impossible to single any group out for exceptional bastardhod among their peers. The Germans, the Slavs, the Aryans, the Bantu, the Arabs, the Mongols, all have great rivers of blood in their history.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
everyone were complete bastards before 1950 or so
and Islam is definitely in the running
but western europe is also as are many other groups
Islam is a very large culture and has had both positive and negative groups
as had many other cultures
I personally think the two (western and islam) were pretty even for those years (6-17)
but recently (19.5+) west has been better
remember Chris that you have to include a lot of russia and germany and the like in the west culture group
comparing Islam to England is not fair
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I say China, just because of the question, throughout history. The Chinese have been around twice as long s any other civilization, thus they've had twice the time to be bastards.
After that, it would be impossible to single any group out for exceptional bastardhod among their peers. The Germans, the Slavs, the Aryans, the Bantu, the Arabs, the Mongols, all have great rivers of blood in their history. |
ayh, I think I agree with you
bascially prior to 19th everyone were bastards and China has been arround the longest so ....
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: I have no idea why many people here want to bend over and give islam a big kiss on the backside, but I never will.
For all their fine accomplishments they left a blood trail miles wide with a history of aggression and intolernce they extends to this day. |
*cough* Christianity.
It if funny that you call Islam the biggest bastards in history when Christianity has done the same things, sometimes worse. Your Christianity bias is showing through.
quote: It seems in vogue today to blame Europe and America for the world's problems, and theiren lies Islam's number one problem, and inability to look truthfully at it's past and what it wants, and to blame it's problems on others.
Your the perfect example Imran, and educated man, yet you turn your back on knowledge and fall into retoric and falsehood when anything that shows a bad light on Islam is brought up. |
Ironically you portray me as a anti-European and anti-American here . It is so funny, I probably don't have to respond.
quote: You are the perfect example of what is symptamatic of Islam, blame others for your own short comings, and turn nelson's blind eye to the truth of history |
You mean like the same in the Christian world, who are responsible for the greatest horrors in the world. After all the Christian world owned about 90% of the world at one time and destroyed, killed, and plundered in the name of colony.
quote: Transcend is just a fool, so we need not concern ourselves with him, but you should know better. |
He is obviously more intelligent (especially on history) than you seem to be.
quote: Yet you thought differently before I dared question Islam. |
Actually I didn't (check out the forum on the CBS league website), I just didn't want to say it in front of you. But since you've revealed yourself to be a bigot and a collosol moron, I don't care anymore.
quote: Chris, singling out Islam and pretending it is somehow exceptional in history is rather ludicrous. The Germanic nations of the post-Roman era were every bit as expansionist and bloody, and they were a heck of a lot more intellerant to boot.
It isn't that what you say about the bloody crecent isn't true. It's that you write as though it is the worst. I'm not sure that worst can truely be quantitified historically. |
EXACTLY! Islamic conquest was in no way worse than European wars of conquest (um... Crusades anyone? What about the 30 Years War?).
quote: Or are you just being an American-Boddington? |
Only problem is that he believes his ignorant babblings. A trip to my ignore list is forseeable in the near future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|