 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Remnind me that if I ever have the time and money to bring the kids to Europe tha I should avoid the Netherlands like the plague.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Hey Ming, this guy's over at the NAMBLA thread advocating pedophilia. Would you kindly step over to the other thread and continue whomping him for me? I've go to go to work.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tom201
|
|
Amsterdam
Dec 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: Hey Ming, this guy's over at the NAMBLA thread advocating pedophilia. Would you kindly step over to the other thread and continue whomping him for me? I've go to go to work. |
Year, lets get the mob and burn da house.
By the way Im not advocating pedophilia.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tom201
|
|
Amsterdam
Dec 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
Pedophilia is sex with someone not yet an adolescents (someone below the age of 12). 14 Doesnt fit in this definition
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tom201
Pedophilia is sex with someone not yet an adolescents (someone below the age of 12). 14 Doesnt fit in this definition |
Tom: That's your definition. It is a subjective decision.
One of the problems here is that you're trying to apply your state of mind at 12 to everyone's state of mind at that age. You sound like you're an acception to the rule. Advanced maturity at a young age. Or do you think all of your classmates at that time were capable of doing what you did?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gibsie
|
 |
all over the proverbial shop
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: He wants you locked up if you molest children. Do you? Anything under 18 applies, but if you were both under 18, it shouldn't be as severe a sentence. |
Wow, I started this thread about someone else having sex with a 14 year-old and I get someone saying any adult having sex with someone younger than 18 (presumably you apply this standard to everyone and noy just Tom, Sava), should be locked up, so, because I've had sex with a 17 year-old when I was 18, I should be locked up too. Isn't that a little extreme?! 
Btw Ming, paedophilia only applies to the pre-pubescent. Most 14 year olds aren't pre-pubescent, so sex with a 14 year-old, especially one who is fully developed physically is not paedophilia. Just disgusting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Triped
|
|
Caledonia, Illinois, USA
Sep 2001 time: 23:19
|
|
As far as I can tell, gays don't have a problem making decisions for themselves.
14-year-olds do. That's why such laws exist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Triped
|
|
Caledonia, Illinois, USA
Sep 2001 time: 23:19
|
|
Unless I'm completely missing something, gay relationships and pedophile relationships (I guess that's what you call them) wouldn't be viewed as disgusting for the same reasons.
This 14-21 relationship doesn't strike me as wrong because a 14-year-old is having sex with a 21-year-old (as anti-gays would find a man having sex with a man wrong), it strikes me as wrong because the 14-year-old most likely does not know what she is doing, or what she's gotten into, or how to get out of it if necessary.
Anti-pedophile laws focus on protecting the minors, not restricting the pedophiles. They're not in place because we hate people like that, they're there because 14-year-olds just don't get it yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|