 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Don't you see the paradox?
Creationists ask why God would need to be created in order to create the world, others ask why the World needs to be created to exist.
They're both saying the same thing, but the Creationists are a bit too out there considering there's zero evidence of it. And plenty against it. |
umm
the world needs to be created to exist based upon scientif evidence (and I mean created as in there must be some cause that caused the world to form)
now win you get down into how the universe came into existence you come into a more complicated question in physics (Hawking and others have written about what could have happened)
our universe obeys laws of causality and the like, a God outside of the universe would not need to obey these laws
I would recommend reading some philosophy (particularly that of Time)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
quote: Our bodies, for instance, are so complex, that the odds of them just evolving over a long period time is like 1 in centillion (680 zeros) |
The odds of you being born were pretty highly improbable too. This is a perfect chance to apply the anthropic principle with no logical fallacy.
You have to show that intelligence of any kind is impossibly unlikey to have evolved in nature. |
I think that saying that there must be a creator (at any point in the universe's evolution) and that is God is going down the wrong road (from my position as a Christian and a theist)
it needs to be a choice, not some A -> B -> C
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Apocalypse
Yes. Change makes life interesting. I like when things change, especially when I would get back something nice like love. |
then I would suggest that you search for it
the search is somewhat ongoing (and I have derailed at times)
it was highly personal for me, so good luck
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
quote: I think that saying that there must be a creator (at any point in the universe's evolution) and that is God is going down the wrong road (from my position as a Christian and a theist)
it needs to be a choice, not some A -> B -> C |
I don't understand what you mean. Are you saying that God is more clever than to leave his tracks on the Universe? If so, then I have no argument with you. There is no possible way for me to disprove that God created the Universe.
Those I have problems with are people who try and prove that God did such-and-such because it would have been impossible without him. I suspect that this is what Cloud9 was trying to do, and demonstrated the flaw in his logic. |
to your first statement
yes
sorry all, I got to go now
good luck Apocalypse
bye all
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
How do you know that the Universe follows the laws of causality, Jon?
Just because it is now doesn't mean it has always been so. |
It seems to.
Physics takes it on faith that it does (for the most part).
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I want to talk more with you all
come on again tomorrow
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Apocalypse
|
 |
Lexington, VA: College - Houston, TX: Home
Aug 2005 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Cornelius Tacitus was born circa A.D. 52-54 and was a Roman historian. He alluded to the death of Jesus and to Christians in Rome when he wrote:
"Hence to suppress the rumor, he (Nero) falsely charged with the guilt, and punished with the most exquisite tortures, the persons commonly called Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius; but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also" (Annals, XV.44).
|
I would find a Roman record closer to 30 AD, but this thread is moving fast so I found the first one I came upon.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
And to think this whole discussion started because of a cartoon. But actually I tend to agree with Paitkis here although I think we need to understand what the word "good" means in the Bible.
Hypocrisy is not good. In fact that seems to be the chief sin in God's eyes. Jesus condemned religious hypocrites to hell and held out hope for the common man who "received his words gladly". He also turned the world upside down when he appeared on the scene. He rejected those who thought they had some type of favor with God and he accepted the prostitutes, common sinners, tax collectors and other despised people.
There is no reason to think that he is not doing the same thing now. An atheist who is not a hypocrite may very well enter into the kingdom of God while a so called Christian may find himself without. On the other hand people need to stop mocking God because they do not understand him. He is the only hope and it seems rather foolish to assume that we have more wisdom and knowledge than him. He will mock those who mock him. So if an atheist is not sure I think it is best to refrain from ridicule until you do know for sure.
An atheist who claims that he does know for sure that there is no God is likewise a fool. I respect agnostics more than I do a lot of Christians. The point is that God sees the heart of man and he is not fooled by hypocrites or do-gooders whos motives are not pure. Doing good is not always good in God's eyes and openly sinning is sometimes just a cry for help that God will hear before he hears the prayer of a hypocrite.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|