 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:20
|
|
SKILORD, et al.:
As time (defined as years, in this case) has passed, allowing me to refine my thoughts on this subject, I can only come up with the following:
I've always found God outside the churches and outside the holy books. I see God in the night skies when I look up and see the moons, planets, stars and galaxies wheeling overhead. I see God every time an announcement is made of a new celestial discovery, or the discovery of a treatment for some horrid disease. I find God when I am away from the cities and in the countryside ... hearing the rivers flow, the brooks babble and the waves lap on the shores. I see God in the majestic quality and quantity of life that abounds on Earth. I see God ever so briefly when I read about or see people do good things. I see God in the tracts of some of our greatest philosophers. I see God when I have a good day, and can go to sleep at night and dream. Above all, I see God in the tiny, scrunched up faces of our newborn children.
To know God — inasmuch as that's possible — is to know peace, wisdom, music and love. To turn Heaven and Hell into mirrors of Earth — i.e., where people fight all the time and the losers spend "eternity" in lakes of fire planning their revenge — is, well, human.
If what I wrote above sounds hokey, then so be it.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Thucydides
|
 |
Screw you guys, I'm going home.
Jan 1970 time: 05:20
|
|
Skillord,
If someone started trying to convince people that the world was flat, wouldn't you have the urge to correct him and clearly demonstrate the world was round? Since your certain the world is round and that it can be demonstrated, why not enlighten someone as to that point.
I myself started out feeling the same way concerning Christians. However, after an encounter or two with fundamentalist, it should soon become clear to most non-believers that most fundamentalist Christian's beliefs are almost completely emotional based and you have almost no chance of changing their mind no matter how copious the amount of evidence you bring before them.
However, because there are people who neither non-rational creationists or agnostic evolutionists, it helps to debate for the people sitting on the fence, at least when somebody else is around. The second problem is when Fundies become politically active, in which case the only way to fight them is to likewise.
So in other words, I personally don't try to convert a fundamentalist Christian, you would have a better chance of convincing Bill Gates to give away his fortune and company to Apple and become a hermit. In fact, if nobody brings the subject up, neither will I. However, if someone comes up to me about the subject, I'll still debate them about it if for no other reason then to sharpen up my skills and know my enemy. It's not really that I actually expect to convert anyone except those who aren't sure about the subject.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
Well, to argue with the next post . . . (cuz I'd killed this post before he posted, apparently)
I did point out that what was taught in schools was merely a closer approximation of Pi. However, 3.14159... is far superior than simply 3. How would we be able to teach engineering students, for example?
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 29-06-2002 at 18:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Oh here we go again with the old pi falacy. People really should read the Bible. The measurment of 3 takes into consideration the rim of the vessel. For example:
A vessel is to be 3 feet in diameter. The circumference is 9 feet. There is no other measurement for the rim (which is alluded to elsewhere). The measurements then define the diameter and the width of the rim.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
But Lincoln, the Bible said it was a circle, and that it was 10 across and 30 around. Now, from Mathematics, we know that if you divide the circumfrence (30) by the diameter (10) you get Pi. In the passage in question, Pi must =3. Since we know that Pi does not =3, then the vessel must have been incorrectly measured (or, more likely, rounded off because the ancient Hebrews couldn't handle the concept of non-whole numbers). In any event, the Bible is wrong in this one place (at the very least). There is no way around this.
Either we are reading the passage incorrectly or it has been translated into English incorrectly or the Bible has a fact wrong.
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 29-06-2002 at 18:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
The vessel has a rim. It all adds up when you consider the rim.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|