 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
You're a mathemtician Jon, you ought to be a better logician than this.
You are asserting A & B -> C
But A !-> C
And B !-> C
You need something to back these assertions up. |
what is your diffinition of human?
can we agree that for something to be human it must be genetically human?
and I hope to not get into logic of that level
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
so C -> B
(where C is human and B is human genetics)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
OK
so we argee there
so then does C -> A?
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
No, I was asking why being a human genetically is relevant to being considered to having legal rights. |
currently, everyone who has legal rights is a human genetically
so it is worth refering to
I am attempting to make it clear
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
I didn't agree that C->B. If a sentient alien lands here, I would consider it immoral and illegal to kill him.
I do not think so. I don't see it as relevant criteria. The only criteria I consider for warranting protection is development of the brain and nervous system. |
hmm
you are not understanding me
are all things which are immoral to kill currently human
don't go on the stupid side tracks
and are all things which are currently immoral to kill such that they are immoral to kill in the future?
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
that probably means that we all missed them in replying to others
that is the usual reason
repost them
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
so you are saying that your right to life depends upon your quality life
that seounds really shallow to me
Jon miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
so it is the right of the killer to do what he wishes with his body
even murder
(yah, this is not good debate but Ramo disappeared and the proabortion crowd is not debating so why should I?)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stefu
|
 |
CLOWNS WIT DA DOWNS 4 LIFE YO!
Jan 1970 time: 07:20
|
|
Sometimes I wonder whether slavery arguments followed this general pattern.
Abolitionist: Slavery is evil.
Slaveocrat: You abolitionists just want to meddle with owner's right to decide what he wants to do with his plantation. MY PLANTATION, MY CHOICE!
Abolitionist: Yes, but you shouldn't hold human beings as slaves.
Slaveocrat: Yes, but what does human being mean? Certainly you don't mean that Negroes are like us whites. *pulls out a "study" that "scientifically" proves black people are equivalent of monkeys* See? Since Negroes aren't humans, you shouldn't meddle with our right to own animate property.
Abolitionist: Slavery is a crime against humanity.
Slaveocrat: Well, it's obviously not criminal to own slaves, so it's not a crime.   
Abolitionist: People should be free, because...
Slaveocrat: Free? FREE? How can abolitionists speak of freedom when they don't support the right to own animate property? All you abolitionists are like John Brown, killing people for sake of animate property! YOU ARE WRONG! YOU ARE WRONG!
Abolitionist: But...
Slaveocrat: YOU ARE WRONG! Think about it - if we end right to own animate property, who does it hurt? The poor white people who have to compete with freed animate property, and who can't climb out of their poverty via traditional way of owning animate property! Abolitionists want us to be like up North, where capitalists treat white people like trash!
Abolitionist: Well, no...
Slaveocrat: AND ANOTHER THING! If we put forth the abolition, then the Negroes will just run around and go killing white people! Some freedom-lovers - you just want people KILLED! You just want to infringe on people's right to own property, you TYRANTS! Such hypocrisy!
Abolitionist: I don't think that's...
Slaveocrat: And another thing! Even your beloved Negro will suffer! Owning of animate property will undoubtedly continue in another form, like tenant farming, but because there no longer is bond between slave and his owner, Negroes will be brutalized, both by their masters and poor whites angry at end of slavery! There will be lynchings! Worse than slavery, any day!
Slaveocrat: Let me now demonstrate how stupid the abolitionist position is! If we take it to logical conclusion, soon we will take Orang-Utans out of jungles and give them vote and let them marry white women! Do you abolitionists support THAT? Do you? Do you?
...et cetera, et cetera, ad nauseaum...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Jaako
I want you to answer these questions
whhat should be done about murders? (if say their wish to murder is becuase the person they murdered was making their life miserable or something)
what shold be done with those who want to murder despite the law forbiding it? (same reason for the wish in this case as above)
good post Stefu
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|