 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberGnu
Question is, how would this work practically? How do you test the children? Would you continually retest them? Are these behaviors hardwired or can they change over time (I.e. can a boy who is a SP at age 7 turn into a NF at age 10?). How important are the differences? Important enough to break up good friends, even twins? How does this system deal with the huge number of incredibly dense parents who won't accept that their little genius is classified as an SP instead of an IN? |
Those are all excellent questions, which is why I think it's best in a system like now. Learning styles may change over time, we don't know if it does.
There's too much complication in splitting kids up like that. I think the current system is fine, where it's up to the teachers how they teach the class. The good teachers will adjust it to meet the needs of most students.
I'm one of those people who doesn't fit in the boy or girl stereotype, so splitting up the boys and girls accomplishes nothing but can harm a lot.
I think blackice is exaggerating the problem. People have different learning preferences, it's not viable to meet them all. Splitting up the boys and girls doesn't get rid of the problem, but can create new ones (see PH's comment).
quote: Anyway, speaking as someone who loathed most of grades 1-9 because the swedish school system forces the bright students to have the same pace as the least bright, I would applaud this system. |
I think that's an exception, moving the bright students up a couple grades or into a GATE program. My high school offered 3 levels of study: Regular, Advanced Placement, and International Baccalaureate (IB > AP > Regular). Those students who wanted to be challenged could go for it, and also jump up a grade or two if needed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
blackice, you are exaggerating the problems. Research has proven that there's a stereotypical difference between how boys and girls learn. They're not stating it's a critical issue, in fact many studies suggest it's not a big deal: http://home.earthlink.net/~davidpdi...docs/grslss.htm
That's fine and all, but it's not the solution you seem to think it is. Once again, you see it as a black & white situation.
It's generally accepted to have four different learning styles. One of these are used by the majority of boys (and some girls), one of these by the majority of girls (and some boys), and the other two are mixed in somewhere in the middle.
I don't see how you think the current system has "gender bias" at all, and you've yet to actually demonstrate that. Wouldn't this depend on the teacher, not on the entire world like you're implying?
The fact is, not all boys learn the same way. Not all girls learn the same way. At my school, we had mixed boys & girls. The teachers tended to vary how they taught certain topics, we had tutorial sessions every morning for 45 minutes before class so those who needed help could come in and get 1 on 1 attention. That means the teachers could teach it to the student how the student learns best.
You're making it sound like boys and only boys can understand English, girls and only girls can understand French, and the schools only teach in French. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
blackice
|
 |
Canada where else...
Sep 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
Comparing Student Learning Styles in an Online
Distance Learning Class and an Equivalent On-Campus Class
quote: Research has proven that there's a stereotypical difference between how boys and girls learn. They're not stating it's a critical issue, in fact many studies suggest it's not a big deal: |
The link you provided does not mention “gender” what so ever. More smoke and mirrors. It most certainly does not mention any of what you claim in this opening statement of yours. You have yet to provide one link to back your “opinion” and now want me except this ruse as proof. I have provided several and can provide many more. I figure you are bored with nothing to do. You must be to post that last bit of completely off topic information.
quote: It's generally accepted to have four different learning styles. One of these are used by the majority of boys (and some girls), one of these by the majority of girls (and some boys), and the other two are mixed in somewhere in the middle. |
Then you would have to agree there are differences and they need to be addressed.
quote: I don't see how you think the current system has "gender bias" at all, and you've yet to actually demonstrate that. Wouldn't this depend on the teacher, not on the entire world like you're implying? |
I have and will continue to do so. It depends on many things, social, economical, teachers, gender…
quote: Advocates for girls succeeded in putting pressure on Congress to pass the 1994 Gender Equity in Education Act. Which provided millions of dollars in support for programs aimed at correcting sexism in the classroom, including special math and science programs for girls, sensitivity workshops for educators and new textbooks that corrected gender stereotypes (i.e., women as nurses, men as doctors). Specifically banned discrimination against girls in school.
From the beginning, critics of the empowerment movement claimed that creating special programs for girls was sexist. Later, other researchers -- most prominently Diane Ravitch, a fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former assistant secretary of education, and Christina Hoff Sommers, author of the 1992 book "Who Stole Feminism" and "The War Against Boys" . Began to question whether there had ever been a "girl crisis" in the first place. These critics painted the feminist leaders of the girl empowerment movement as adult women who were somewhat hysterically looking for evidence of patriarchal coercion where none existed, in order to correct inequities that had been solved by the previous generation.
Just last month, the results of a study that tested 15-year-old students in 32 industrialized nations reflected that girls score much higher than boys in reading and [in most countries, including the United States] are on par with the boys in math and science. Authors of the report, issued by PISA (the Program for International Assessment, a French-based international consortium of educational researchers), called the reverse gender gap "striking."
Additional studies show that girls, on average, also have better grades in high school and college and are more likely to be enrolled in accelerated or advanced-placement classes. Boys are much more likely to be held back, diagnosed with a learning disability or put in a remedial or special education class. College admission and graduate rates for girls have soared since 1950. They now constitute the majority of college students and college graduates. And girls earned 57.2 percent of the bachelor's degrees awarded in 2000; boys earned 42.8 percent. |
The only reason you are of the “opinion” I did not prove it was because you did not read it. More “smoke and mirrors from Dr. Asher.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by blackice
The link you provided does not mention “gender” what so ever. More smoke and mirrors. |
It's only smoke and mirrors if you're clueless as to what's going on. The article is about differences in learning, which is stereotyped repeatedly by you with gender. I made the mistake of assuming you'd get the connection, so I'll spell it out for you. The gender differences you keep citing are nothing but a generalized form of different styles of learning applied to genders. The article I cited is about different styles of learning in a general sense, it wasn't intended to talk about gender specifically. Your gender difference is just applied learning differences generalized, nothing more.
quote: You have yet to provide one link to back your “opinion” and now want me except this ruse as proof. |
My opinion is that the current system is adequate, and that link itself comes to the conclusion that there are differences in learning but nobody knows if it's beneficial to split them up.
Earlier I've provided ample evidence to the suggestion of no less than four different styles of learning, and still you insist about splitting the population into two segments based on sex and teaching them accordingly by stereotype.
I don't even think you know what's going on, blackice...
quote: Then you would have to agree there are differences and they need to be addressed. |
I believe the current system addresses them just fine. At least they have for me, and my brother...
Maybe you just had bad teachers, blackice?
quote: More “smoke and mirrors from Dr. Asher. |
You take one catchphrase and you stick to it, don't you? Even when you have no clue whatsoever what's going on! 
I feel like I'm a dog chasing my own tail whenever I debate with you, blackice, so I'm just going to stop trying right now. We'll have to agree to disagree.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
Look, blackice, I'm not sure whether you're just REALLY stupid and think I'm the one that's really stupid, or if you're high and are getting a kick out of it. But I assure you I'm not the one talking out of my ass.
You're the one stereotyping all genders and neglecting everyone else who doesn't fit in the stereotype while at the same time whining how the current system neglects males in general (which is certainly not the case from my own personal experience, and is ALSO not the case for any links or evidence in studies you have provided). Citing links in learning differences gets you absolutely nowhere, since we know people learn differently. Citing links that generalize how each gender learns does not guarantee every member of that gender learns the same way -- it stereotypes.
If you want to show that the current system is dominated by "feminists" (as per one of your first posts) and neglects males in general, I haven't seen it myself and certainly don't see the evidence anywhere in North America. Males seem to be doing just fine.
Now if you want to cite some reputable sources showing how males are being neglected in the face of the feminist oppressors running the school districts, be my guest.
Somehow I'm not surprised you've managed to turn this thread into another thread with your vendetta against women. Oh, I'm sorry, you don't have a problem with women. It's just a coincidence all of your issues trace back to women.
...
Anyway I'm done now. For real this time.
Have a nice night.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
blackice
|
 |
Canada where else...
Sep 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Look, blackice, I'm not sure whether you're just REALLY stupid and think I'm the one that's really stupid, or if you're high and are getting a kick out of it. But I assure you I'm not the one talking out of my ass. |
Your “opinion” again.
quote: You're the one stereotyping all genders and neglecting everyone else who doesn't fit in the stereotype while at the same time whining how the current system neglects males in general |
Gender issues are not stereotyping Dr. Asher you have to get over that concept in order to understand yourself, let alone any other gender issue.
quote: (which is certainly not the case from my own personal experience, and is ALSO not the case for any links or evidence in studies you have provided). |
Dr.Asher you did not read any of them your “opinion” is not very informed.
quote: Citing links in learning differences gets you absolutely nowhere, since we know people learn differently. Citing links that generalize how each gender learns does not guarantee every member of that gender learns the same way -- it stereotypes. |
No Dr.Asher it gives insight into the differences between the genders in hopes to improve the over all education system for everyone.
quote: If you want to show that the current system is dominated by "feminists" (as per one of your first posts) and neglects males in general, I haven't seen it myself and certainly don't see the evidence anywhere in North America. Males seem to be doing just fine. |
Wow a lot of traveling you have done. You conducted this research can we see the papers? Have you published them yet? Give it up Dr. Asher your ruse is over.
quote: Now if you want to cite some reputable sources showing how males are being neglected in the face of the feminist oppressors running the school districts, be my guest. |
I did several times it is a matter of history and fact, this clearly shows you have no idea.
quote: Somehow I'm not surprised you've managed to turn this thread into another thread with your vendetta against women. |
More lies, I do not have a vendetta against women and have not turned this into one. I posted on topic. Gender differences in learning. You have ignored it from the onset. Ok you did make the comment about Gay porno’s coming from all boys’ schools. Do you have proof this is a common ongoing problem?
quote: Oh, I'm sorry, you don't have a problem with women. It's just a coincidence all of your issues trace back to women. |
Gender issues usually involve women Dr.Asher, and yes I post male issues and children’s issues and women’s issues. It is you that have the “opinion” these issue are anti-female. It may surprise you to know women head most men’s groups. Misandrists can be male too obviously…
Now the topic Dr. Asher was does he send his kids to an all-male school.
The only objections so far are about becoming gay in one, involved in gay porno flicks…and or the personal experience of not relating to women because they went to one.
Pretty weak so far. On the other hand years of studies show it’s an advantage educationally for the kids. Easy choice really.
Have a nice night. You too 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|