 |
Should I circumcize my son?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes, of course. |
   |
20 |
25.32% |
| No, why would you? |
   |
51 |
64.56% |
| Try it on a banana first. |
   |
8 |
10.13% |
| Total: |
79 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Frogger
I know no girls who prefer circumcised and 2 who have said they prefer au naturel. |
He's such a frog.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nationalist
|
 |
None of your Goddamned business
Nov 2001
time: 00:21
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Asher
nationalist, do you honestly believe most girls you're about to have sex with will tell you they prefer an uncircumcised penis when you're circumcised?  |
I've had this kind of discussion before, and I had it with girls that I had no intention of ****ing (translation:ugly  ). Its my prefrence. I am aware that, as you pointed out, the foreskin isn't very noticable on an erect penis. I am the one that has to look at it when it is flacid, and I wouldn't want to have a foreskin hanging there. Its a vanity thing. Some people pierce their ears.
quote:
The looks argument is bull, it's just what you're used to. That's obvious. |
It is completely preference. I don't care what you say, or what the current stats are. Be proud to be uncircumcised. It is your penis. Personally, I'd stay circumcised if I were the only circumcised man on the planet. I like it that way
BTW, I've read through this entire thread and it has been by far the most disgusting/hillarious thread I've read here. I have a question for you turtleneckers out there. You say that uncircumcised penises are lubricated. Do you mean that your penises are constantly drippy? Are you always pre-cumming? (pardon the crudness). I think that that would be annoying. Also, circumcised people can masterbate just fine without lube. TMI?
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000
time: 22:21
|
|
I have to say that Horse wrote the words that I thought but didn't dare express for politeness' sake. I got the same vibe from the numerous posts, but felt that it wasn't my place to comment due my my extremely tangential relationship to the parties involved. Of course posting your personal life on an open forum does tend to reduce one's presumption of privacy to an extent.
Horse is more willing to speak his mind, but I do feel that he does so (in this instance anyway) from the heart. We are both old farts and have seen a few situations like this turn out very badly for everyone, especially the children. I certainly hope that I am wrong, but I do trust my own sense of this more than the opinions of the principles, as these sort of problems exist squarely in the blindspots of the afflicted. The rush to defense on the part of both of the male sides of this triangle merely reinforces my opinion that there is a narcissistic personality at the heart of this matter, and now a baby is the latest bit of matter sucked into orbit. That's too bad because babies require a lot of attention to develop normally, and attention around a narcissist is usually in short supply. I hope that I am wrong of course, and in any event everyone does have my best wishes regardless of their opinion of me or my words.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I don't see why people should say my parents are barbarians for having it done on me. |
You so right, Imran. It wouldn't have been barbaric for them to cut off some *other* part of your bod, would it? So why would it be barbaric for them to cut off part of something as unimportant as your peepee?
Last edited by Tom31 on 09-08-2002 at 17:38
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by nationalist
I am the one that has to look at it when it is flacid, and I wouldn't want to have a foreskin hanging there. |
Well, where else would you want to have it hanging? The foreskin is designed for sex.
http://research.cirp.org/func1.html
Last edited by Tom31 on 09-08-2002 at 21:39
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by nationalist
It is completely preference. |
So being circumcised was completely your preference, then?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by DinoDoc
Personally, I don't see what the big deal is about the issue. |
Of course it's not a big deal. Why should it be a big deal if someone grabs a child and cuts off a normal part of his/her sex organ? 
Last edited by Tom31 on 09-08-2002 at 17:30
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by nationalist
I'd say go for cirumcision. My reason? Looks. Uncircumcised penises are gross looking. |
You'd be surprised how gross a cut penis can look if the circumcision isn't done right or there's a complication.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
You mean like my appendix? Nope, they could go ahead with that. |
If the appendix were located at the end of the penis and had a sexual function, then unfortunately they probably WOULD have gone ahead and cut it off.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tom31
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Then they can go ahead. They are fully in their rights to do so. |
Really? Where did u get that idea? Basic principles of ethics, law and human rights prohibit surgery on anyone incapable of giving informed consent, unless those proposing the surgery can show it's medically required. Except in very rare cases circumcision doesn't meet that condition.
Last edited by Tom31 on 09-08-2002 at 23:07
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2002 11:03
|