 |
|  |
 |
|
sabrewolf

|
 |
turicum, helvetistan
Jun 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
che
i really wonder on what information you base your opinions.
nigeria (10th largest) and philipines (13th) happen to be very large nations. iraq is just 44th.
and anyway, noone is claiming to give the philipines and paraguay an own civilisation in the game.
and how do you define "important role". are you talking about who's in the news today? well... then why don't we add simbabwe, east timor, venezuela, tadjikistan, kirgistan, chechnia (how do you write that in english?), ivory coast.
it's good if you try to look for different criteria for the scenario, but you must always think first, if it
a) makes sence
b) is not biased by sympathy or nationalism
c) is possible to include in the game
d) is based on facts
etc.
but anyway: welcome to the forum 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Che Guevara
|
|
What I wanted to say is that not the size of the country is the deciding parameter, the real independes of the civilization in the real world.
take Israel for example, Those people surrvived more than 2000 years outside their own country, while all greatest civilizations felt apart on their own territory(Rome,Persia,Babylon and even USSR).
And now after more than 5 wars in 53 years,
while fighting againts a supirior enemy.
And you are comparing it to east timur or any other third world country?!
What about Nigeria? It's another african country, nothing special(Economicy,Military,Science).
and take Iraq for example, The whole world is living in fear because of them, why? because they can make a diffrence! and maybe, just maybe if all the S.American will be together, they might just be equal to the iraqis.
It's just an example of course.
Except great nations has great leaders, can you say that about east timur or venezuela?
I can't understand why are you making it so hard,
It's pretty obvious that the civilizations that I mentioned are the top nations.
Just Look at their leaders and you will understand everything, I hope 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Yahweh Sabaoth
|
 |
The Heavens
Dec 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Che Guevara
It's pretty obvious that not all the countries can have their own goverments.
for example, i'm sorry if anybody offended, but there is no sence in making Nigiria,philipins or paraguay independet civilizations so you can group them into one alliance that will be much stronger.
and about the selection, you should pick countries that have an important role in the world of these days, so, countries like Israel and Iraq, should be under their own goverments. while countries like greece that have no effection on world's history shouldn't.
so countries, even like S.Arabia in second thought should be under thier own goverment, Even they have a very weak Military, they are affecting the worlds financial situation.
And one final thing, about the list that I wrote, I just wrote the countries that I could remember at the moment, and i didn't tried to rank them. |
Hey, wait a minute. Nigeria is a major oil exporter and arguably the most stable government on the West African coast. It deserves far more to be included in the game than some others on your list.
Besides, even "big powerful" countries like Australia and Canada don't necessarily have too much control over their own destinies... they should be linked to the trade groups to which they belong, who have courts higher than their respective member's national courts. (This is true of NAFTA, believe it or not - a NAFTA court can strike down a Canadian, American or Mexican legal ruling! )
As for Korea, it would be well represented in the American "sphere"... just make the people there several unhappy, as in real life! In my opinion, this should be the case throughout much of the world.
Israel, I do agree, should be independent, but don't malign Nigeria if you support Israel. That's ignorance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Roman
|
 |
Bratislava, Slovakia
Sep 2000 time: 05:22
|
|
Hello, I thought I would chip in with some information on the relative power of various countries. The countries are ranked in order of their power in that particular area from strongest to weakest.
Number of Nuclear Warheads:-
1. Russia: 21,000
2. USA: 12,000
3. China: 500+
4. France: 500
5. UK: 200
6. Israel: 100-200
7. India: 25-100
8. Pakistan: 25-100
9. North Korea: ?2
GDP (Purchasing Power Parity) (in billions of $ [US]):-
1. USA: 10,000
2. China: 5,720
3. Japan: 3,450
4. India: 2,500
5. Germany: 2,170
6. France: 1,510
7. UK: 1,470
8. Italy: 1,400
9. Brazil: 1,340
10. Russia: 1,200
Population (millions of people):
1. China: 1,300
2. India: 1,070
3. USA: 291
4. Indonesia: 232
5. Brazil: 176
6. Pakistan: 148
7. Russia: 143 (Russian population is shrinking by about 1 million people per year. This could be represented by modifying the terrain around their cities, so that they starve.)
8. Bangladesh: 133
9. Nigeria: 130
10. Japan: 127
Land Area (km squared):
1. Russia: 17,000
2. Canada: 10,000
3. China: 9,600
4. USA: 9,600
5. Brazil: 8,500
6. Australia: 7,600
7. India: 3,000
8. Argentine: 2,800
9. Kazachstan: 2,700
10. Sudan: 2,500
I may write out more later if these are of any help.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|