 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
the post is messy, I went offline and put several replies in one 
quote: 1) population exchanges and the league of nations:
a) "macedonians" are "expelled", greeks are "transplanted"
b) the exchange under the Neuilly Treaty was voluntary. more details here
http://history.macedonia.gr/faq.htm#31 |
'the exchange' was ethnic cleansing. it was agreed between governments, not 'voluntary'
quote: 3) 1976-74 junta: of course a dictatorship had no place in the council of europe! meanwhile
"colonization" of the "aegean macedonia" and city name changes continue after 70 years(one would
think this process should be over by that time) |
one would think not. after at least two big ethic cleansing processes, there are still some
Macedonians in Greece left till this day. and still the hellenisation is ongoing.
some points from the page I linked to:
quote: 1920
Greek Ministry Of Internal Affairs publishes booklet: "Advice On The Change Of The Names Of
Municipalities And Villages" in Aegean Macedonia.
1925
76 names of Macedonian villages and towns in the Aegean Macedonia Hellenized since 1918 by Greek
authorities. |
does this not show that hellen names, even if they existed long time ago, were not anymore used by
the native people (Greeks and what was left of Macedonians both), so that central authority had to
rediscover them again?
quote: peace?
1) even at the time of the most craziest claims of FYROM, in the their first couple of years of
indepedence, never did Greece threaten with use of force |
we all know EU wouldnt finance that, so you couldnt even if you wanted 
and I have no doubts it was seriousely contemplated in greece. What with consultations with
Milosevic and greek-serbian confederation
quote: 2) despite the remaining issue of the name(they've dropped the use of the vergina star(see my
avatar) in their flag and more importantly the "liberational" claims in their constitution) Greece
is the biggest investor in FYROM
so not to sound overly patriotic, but me thinks Greece has handled this pretty peacefully |
greece has handled the situation (1990-) like a jelous *****, pardon my french
if macedonians decided to play that game they would block traffic for the Olympics, and as paiktis
mentioned, few well placed bombs would do a miracle for greek tourism. they have a history of
terrorist organizations too 
Pioneer:
quote: Greece though knew that Tito called the province now known as FYROM Macedonia. Heck, even older
Olympic Air maps had that place called Macedonia. Back then nobody really cared and us contemporary
Greeks short sighted as we always are did not give a damn. Later one, in the beginning of the 90s
it became again a topic of "National" interest. |
is it true then that Greece used to refer to territories as 'norhtern greece' or some such, and
that claim on the very name of Macedonia is very recent? is it true that in a period until 20 years
ago greeks avoided and even despised the name Macedonia?
quote: I guess Bush would nuke them to the ground and ask questions later! Now that's where Greece
differs and in whole did and has done a good job with the whole situation. |
If you seriousely (I see no smilies) think nuclear bombs would/should fly over some maps, you have
a problem with reality.
quote: People in States have never really felt threatened by a country that borders them nor have they
ever had a history such as most European countries which burden their present. Don't take me wrong
I envy you for that but on the other side the same fact gives you a more naive and oversimplified
look on other problems. Thus, you do not always understand to what extend something like this may
affect somebody. |
Well, I do not understand Greek behaviour and I am from Croatia; extreme nationalism and xenophobia
are not exactly unknown terms to me 
actually I do understand, but it is completely irrational, and it is evil. In EU, it is unthinkable
and it should be inexcusable.
Unfortunately the few Macedonian posters who post on apolyton do not visit the OT. The side effect
of this is that we dont get to hear the Macedonian point of view here presented by a native, which
would cetrainly be interesting.
I have read some of the FAQ MarkG uses to bac his arguments. I find that FAQ to be pure propaganda.
For one, it doesnt answer frequently asked questions with truths.
if I am taking a slightly pro-macedonian view, that is because their online sources sounded more
convincing to me. Feel free to prove me wrong.
now, questions for the resident greeks:
1. do you agree that all transfers of population are tragic to the populations involved? that it is
ethnic cleansing, and it is a bad practice? (it is a criminal offense you know)
2. did greece conduct a policy of ethnic cleansing against Macedonians in the past?
3. did greece conduct forced assimilations on Macedonians in the past?
4. does greece still do that?
I believe answer to all these questions is yes
more from the FAQ:
quote: 1) The use of Slavic names for Greek cities instead of the Greek
ones (they prefer to call Thessaloniki, Solun, to call Kastoria ,
Kostur, to call Florina, Lerin, to call Edessa, Voden etc),
beyond the usual changes that the translation of various names
from one language to another requires. The use of Slavic toponyms
is intended to cast a doubt on the greekness of the various
places in Macedonia. |
Gorica (Gorizia), Trst (Trieste), Udine (Udizia), ...
More usurpations of Greek teritory? no, slavic names for cities in northern Italy, near Slovenia
and Croatia
did Italy ask of Slovenia to be named FYROS? no, italians are reasonable foks 
Slovenia Vs Italy is actually a nice comparison to Greece vs. Macedonia
Slovenians in Italy have full minority rights, including schooling, two-language names of streets
and institutions, border passing with only personal ID and no passport, etc.
compare to Greece, where there are no Macedonians at all, see a quote from the disastorous FAQ:
quote: Skopjan minority claims.
How many supposedly "Macedonians" of the Skopjan type are in
Greece? Well, the Skopjans and their supporters cannot agree to
a reasonable figure.
Once Radio Belgrade (Dec 14, 1950) claimed this number was
250,000. On August 28, 1953 Yugopress claimed it was 120,000.
The current claim depends on the weather :-), the mood of the es-
timator, and the outcome of some (probably highly biased) random
number generator :-) :-). |
ha. ha. ha. very funny. how is someone from belgrade suposed to count the Macedonians in greece?
how many greek censuses had the option 'Macedonian' in them? none? well that explains who the joke
is on I think 
more from the FAQ:
quote: 2) The use of the term "Aegean Macedonia" (a term invented and
used by Skopjans and by people of similar desires) instead of
say the more acceptable and less suspicious "Greek Macedonia" to
identify Macedonia, Greece (that is the region called Macedonia
in Greece). This can be interpreted as an attempt to present
this part as a member of a whole (usually called "Greater Ma-
cedonia") yet "unliberated". |
if Greeks want to be consistent, "Aegean FYROM" should bother them. 'Aegean Macedonia' should be
perfectly ok.
quote: 3) [From [7]]: A calendar for the year 1981 was published in
Skopje |
if there was any reason involved, a calendar published by who knows who in 1981 would not be a base
for actions of greece in 1991. I am betting the circulation of this calendar under 1000 copies
quote: Maps depicting Macedonia, Greece, as part of the Republic of
Skopje have been published recently (November 1992) in Skopje ac-
cording to various reports. |
I work with publishing firm. I ll go now and publish maps of croatia with finland in it. maybe I
can trap finland to declare war on us and occupy us 
quote: 4)[From [7]]: In 1973 a large size picture book was circulated in
many languages which shows "the immigrants" from the other two
sectors of "Macedonia" |
alright! we are going further back in history! I wander what suspicuous books were published around
discovery of the wheel 
quote: 10) End of 1960: The Government in Belgrade adopted a law that
officially recognised as time served to the Yugoslavian Armed
Forces the time served by Greek Communist guerillas in Greek-
communist organizations, other than EAM-ELAS, fighting against
the Greek government during the greek civil war 1944-1949. Par-
ticipation in EAM-ELAS (1941-1949) has been recognised since
1954. |
I believe ex-yu did that for quite a number of countries (I can check if you want)
Does time recognised for serving in soviet forces demonstrate yugoslavian claims on soviet
territory? or italian or french?
quote: This is just a small sample of the Skopjan provocations. |
enough to reveal the paranoid mindset needed to take them seriousely.
AH
quote: 1994
Extremists in Australia's Greek Community burn two Macedonian churches, after Australian
recognition of Macedonia. |
they bring their madness with them wherever they go 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|