 |
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Then why doesn't ANY single person I've discussed this in Greece and any of the Euros in here say that it was ok to use gas? Why does it have to be you and your kind? Don't you see a dislocation here? Don't you recognise that the Americans are supporting the Russian authorities with too much of a nationalistic attitude? Why didn't you do the same with the Kursk case? Back then, all you had to say is that the Russians are incopetent and your navy would never have handled the case in such a way, etc...
Isn't this somewhat bigoted, or not? |
Bigoted? Wtf? The Kursk incident and this one are totally different, and thus the different opinions on how each was handled. The Kursk was lost due to an accident, and the Russian government/navy handled it rather poorly - blaming it on a mysterious western sub, witholding info from the families, misinformation, disorganization, refusing to ask for help. But in the end, it was just a terrible accident.
This was no accident. This was a terrorist attack. In attempting to rescue the Kursk, the Russian government did not have 30 armed hostiles to deal with (though I suppose the Arctic Sea could be considered hostile).
I think those that having voiced support (and some of that support has been partial - like, hmm, could have been done better perhaps, but they had to go in), several of whom were not right-wing Americans, are those who believe that given the risk of the terrorists killing all 700+ of the hostages, a raid that resulted in the deaths of 150 or so was acceptable.
My personal opinion is that the idea of using gas to knock out the terrorists was a good one (especially given the women terrorists who had bombs strapped to themselves and were ready to disperse amongst the hostages and detonate) but the concentration of the gas and the lack of info given to the doctors was a negative. In other words, it was a long way from perfect, but what the hell else were they supposed to do?
This was a no-win situation for the Russians. They couldn't give in (withdraw from Chechnya immediately) as that would be allowing terrorists to dictate government policy (even if the policy change is the right one, you do NOT allow thugs to hold a gun to your head and force you to make a change). They had to go in.
So, though it's terrible that so many died, it could quite possibly had been worse had they NOT used the gas prior to storming the theater. I am also not a special forces guy, so I can't sit here at my keyboard and say "well, geez, all they had to do was knock out those women with the bombs strapped on 'em with snipers and everything would have been fine."
Axi, if you're gonna throw around accusations of bigotry, you may wish to examine your own attitudes regarding Americans.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
There are rumors that the gas was opiod based. I didn't know that was possible. Most opiod molecules are too big to have a gaseous state. The shame is that there are excellent antidotes for the opiods like narcan and naltrexone. If the hospital had been able to prepare in advance they could have just given everybody a shot at the door. Doses could have been flown in from any nation in europe. Given the relative frequency of opiod overdoses I'd bet that every hospital in western europe has some stocked.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Well, you know, we just don't know exactly what they used. If it was BZ there is no specific antidote that I know of. With respect to the claim that it was some sort of opiod narcotic, all I can say is that as far as I know there are no narcotics that can be turned in to a pharmacologically active gas, but if there were I would presume that the usual opiod antidote would be effective.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saint Marcus
it wasn't BZ. it probably was Feylon (sp?) |
I have no idea what Feylon is. Is it an opiod derivative as some have suggested? If so then the antidote is widely available even in europe I believe.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Sorry, Fez, that's bullshit. The doctors could have saved many of the hostages had they been given the antidotes. Whether or not the gas was needed is one thing, but even if it was, those people did NOT need to die. That was a product of an extreme lack of forsight and bungling on the part of the government. |
Unless of course, there is no antidote and the Russians know there is no antidote.
I do vaguely remembering Vladimir Putin apologising to the Nation along the lines of "forgive us". Perhaps he knows more about the gas than we do?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Fentenyl? |
Fentanyl I've heard of. It's a potent narcotic which can be administered by patch. I'd never heard of it being used as a gas. Like I said awhile back opiods are fairly big molecules composed of multiple organic ring structures. I don't know how it would be possible to turn something like that into a gas.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
Would there be permanent damage to the survivors from an overdose of this drug?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Oh great! Now it's possible to inhale yet another type of narcotic! If the gangs ever figure out how to reproduce this stuff and market it the streets of America will be covered with corpses.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|