 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tingkai
Oh I forgot that in your world view, the US can do no wrong. |
That's also nonsense, but whatever...
quote: So you're not attacking the men and women who serve in the Forces, but you are attacking the Forces bureaucracy, which by definition are the men and women who serve in the Forces. |
If the DND Bureaucracy demanded more funding, and were perhaps more able than they appear in interviews and public actions (like the Sea King report fiasco), then perhaps I'd place the blame solely on the federal government.
Both the DND Bureaucracy and the Federal Government both need to seriously shape up.
I'm friends with several people in the Canadian military, and they're fine people, but from everything I've heard from them (both logistically with the DND and federally with funding), there's a LOT to be desired.
quote: That's the problem with Canadian society. Too many greedy people who demand the government give them everything |
Socialists. 
I agree, major problem. 
quote: But no, life for you is just about money. |
Life for me is about doing what I want to do with it. Unlike you, I don't have a blind patriotism to a federal government which has done nothing but aggravate me. I won't join the Canadian forces, I'd be more likely to join the US forces, but I'm even more likely to never even consider joining either short of being invaded by someone like Quebec.
quote: Quote frankly, the Forces are better off without your type. |
Oh, without a doubt. I think too much to be in the forces. 

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Willem
|
 |
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
You don't need a huge armed forces for that. UN peacekeepers are just lightly armed, I can't recall them having tanks, attack helicopters, and all those toys. It's not like they are expected to face an opposing army, they are just there to keep the rioters at bay. Hey, if Bangladesh can supply people to peacekeeping missions, I am sure Canada can too. |
We have lots of people on peacekeeping missions, all over the world. The problem is that there are now so many areas that need help that our forces are stretched very thin. This will be especially so when this war is over, and the reconstrucion of Iraq begins. We just don't have the people to deal with all these trouble spots, we need more.
quote: If there is no need for said protection, why have it? It's much better to put the money in education and healthcare. |
Many Canadians take pride in the fact that we have peacekeepers all over the world. We're not really concerned about a traditional military per se, but we would like to able to send troops to troubled areas and do our part for the UN. And we're starting to have a hard time meeting the commitments we feel we should be.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
If the DND Bureaucracy demanded more funding, and were perhaps more able than they appear in interviews and public actions (like the Sea King report fiasco), then perhaps I'd place the blame solely on the federal government.
|
DND continually demands more funding, but the current government was more interested in a balance budget and the PR gained from joining lots of peacekeeping missions. End result, the Forces get screwed.
The Forces do not control the pursestrings. It is that simple.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Both the DND Bureaucracy and the Federal Government both need to seriously shape up.
I'm friends with several people in the Canadian military, and they're fine people, but from everything I've heard from them (both logistically with the DND and federally with funding), there's a LOT to be desired.
|
You don't know what you are talking about.
After you some real work experience, you will learn that there is bureaucracy in every organisation. The amount of bureaucracy in the Forces is pretty much par for the course. It has no effect on the Forces ability to buy new equipment.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Life for me is about doing what I want to do with it.
|
Asher, you don't need to tell us that you're selfish, that you only care about yourself. Everyone knows that already.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I won't join the Canadian forces
|
News flash, the Forces don't want your type. Even if we were incredibly desparate, and you somehow got accepted, you wouldn't last a week. You haven't got what it takes: committment, dedication, a willingness to help others.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I think too much to be in the forces.
|
Another example of how you don't know anything about life in the Forces.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tingkai
The Forces do not control the pursestrings. It is that simple. |
No sh*t, but if they make it more clear (like not EDITING their reports after to lessen demands for new equipment), they'd get more funding, faster.
quote: After you some real work experience, you will learn that there is bureaucracy in every organisation. |
No way! OH MY GOD! My life is over. 
Why is it that virtually every argument you put forth is either irrelevant or a strawman?
quote: Asher, you don't need to tell us that you're selfish, that you only care about yourself. Everyone knows that already. |
You make many large jumps to conclusions...
I don't care about only myself. I care about my family and friends, also. I care about the people serving in the military, I care about giving them the adequate funding they need to do their job.
I do NOT care for Chretien, I will NOT risk my life for his sorry ass, and I will NOT risk my life for a country that has pissed me off more than it has made me proud. You call that selfish, I call it reasonable.
Now, if Alberta was recruiting forces to defend it, I'd seriously consider joining. Canada? No.
quote: News flash, the Forces don't want your type. |
The recruiters I spoke to gave a decidedly different impression...
quote: You haven't got what it takes: committment, dedication, a willingness to help others. |
YOU don't know what you're talking about. You take my distaste for Canada's federal government and extrapolate it into not caring about anything, not being able to dedicate myself, and not being able to help others.
You know what? F*ck you. You're exactly the reason why I won't risk my life for Canada. Canada doesn't respect me, Canadians don't respect me or people from my province in general, and I sure as hell won't put my ass on the line so you can sit on your high horse and shout down at people and judge them based on their opinion of your federal government.
Piss off. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
You need more than Canada has. Honestly, you do. It's a simple logistics problem that's widely known in Canada. |
There are two ways to solve this problem. The first one is to improve logistics. The seond one, to reduce the men fielded. If you consider the fact that the US has field 1 (one) soldier so far for UN peacekeeping missions, you don't need to feel embarassed.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
It's not only a question of armament, UR, why do you assume it is? It's a simple problem of not having enough soldiers in the first place, and then having antiquated equipment for them to use, if there's much at all. |
Equipment is usually what most people complain about.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
BTW, haven't you seen those white UN tanks?  |
I have seen APCs but not tanks.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Because there's no way to guarantee you won't need it. Really, there's not. That's the problem. |
It all boils down to an assessment of the global situation. You ask two questions: why and how.
Given the size of Canada, not a lot of countries can conquer it. Invade, sure, but conquer, no. The US doesn't have a big enough army. The PRC has a big enough army, but will not be able to tackle the logistics problem now or in the near future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
There are two ways to solve this problem. The first one is to improve logistics. |
We can't create soldiers out of thin air. We need more funding for that, you know...
quote: The seond one, to reduce the men fielded. |
So Canada should continually reduce our peacekeeping forces? I'm ideologically opposed to that.
quote: Given the size of Canada, not a lot of countries can conquer it. Invade, sure, but conquer, no. |
That argument doesn't really cut it. The vast majority of Canada's population is concentrated in certain areas.
There's certain areas in particular that hold more oil than all of Saudi Arabia, and have only about half a dozen F-18s defending it...
Last edited by Asher on 27-03-2003 at 09:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frogger
And I don't see it as a "problem" at all.
But I do think that government should do more to encourage procreation in the form of tax credit and direct subsidies. |
:d:
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|