 |
|
Menlas
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GeneralTacticus
True enough. I attended a lecture a while ago about how deep the collaboration with the Nazis actually was, and how much it's been suppressed, which was pretty damn disturbing. |
What i wanted to show is that those soldiers who fought agaisnt the allies weren't fundamentally antisemitists or anti-allies...they just had to obey the orders, and the fact that they were given by a former marechal, hero of WW1, was inciting them a bit more.
Same thing for the people in France during WW2 : the majority of them weren't neither heroic resistants, nor collaborationists (which is quite logical after all).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:27
|
|
In contemplating the upcoming battle of Baghdad, I was thinking of what it would have been like had the Nazi's chosen to stand and fight in Rome and Paris. Those beautiful cities would have been destroyed like Warsaw and Berlin were later.
BTW, if the Nazi's take up positions in civilian areas and those civilian areas are destroyed, why is it the Allies fault that they were destroyed. I think the blame should be given to the Nazi's just like they should be given some credit for abandoning Rome and Paris without a fight.
Last edited by Ned on 29-03-2003 at 23:13
|
|
|  |
 |
|
badman
|
 |
Heidelberg, Germany
Jul 2002 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
In contemplating the upcoming battle of Baghdad, I was thinking of what it would have been like had the Nazi chosen to stand and fight in Rome and Paris. Those beautiful cities would have been destroyed like Warsaw and Berlin were later.
BTW, if the Nazi's take up positions in civilian areas and those civilian areas are destroyed, why is it the Allies fault that they were destroyed. I think the blame should be given to the Nazi's just like they should be given some credit for abandoning Rome and Paris without a fight. |
I agree with you but in contrast to Gulf War II, WWII was a justified war in order to liberate Europe from brutal conquerors who were committing genocide.
Right now, the Americans are the attackers and invasors and the Iraqis are defending their country. Even though I hope the Americans will win the war, I still think that the war is not justified and even if Saddam is a cruel dictator, he was not an immediate threat to the world's peace and it will be impossible to force democracy upon the Iraqis.
So the war is absolutely senseless.
But back to topic: in Germany we do not have problems with violence of Muslims towards Jews since hardly any Jews still live in Germany (sad, but of course I understand why).
But there is a growing tension and resentment between the three large ethincal groups in Germany ("original" Germans, immigrants from Eastern Europe, and immigrants from Arabic countries).
In my opinion this problem is mostly due to the poor integration of the immigrants, many don't even speak German. I also think that Germany has accepted more immigrants than it could handle, we have the largest percentage (and absolute number) of foreigners in Europe (other than small countries like Luxemburg).
We should consider starting to chose our immigrants like the US do.
Yet there are other reasons as well: Some parts of Eastern Germany have really huge problems with Neonazis. The education system of the GDR failed there and since Eastern Germany has an average unemployment rate of about 18%, many teenagers do not have a prospects and are frustrated.
Right-wing parties like the NPD have had a rise in votes in the 90's but right now they are not gaining votes, they actually seem to be losing votes.
Overall I don't think that Europe has a big problem with racism but we must fight the roots of the racism that exists here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yaroslav
|
 |
Madrid, Spain, Europe
Jun 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberGnu
It all depends on how much responsibility you put on waging war by proxy, doesn't it? And if supporting a regime that continally oppresses a group of different ethnicity isn't expressing hate against that group, what is? |
I'm not going to discuss about Israel, because it's off-topic to this disscusion. If you want to discuss about it, I'm pretty sure that we will meet in a ME east sooner than later. And there are a lot of people that know much more than I about the topic 
quote:
True, but does that really matter in this context? If your thesis is that each individual should be counted a separate person, then we must also diffrentiate between skins who are skins because they hate non-aryans, and skins who are skins because they like the music and the parties, who are skins because they feel they need the protection and security afforded by belonging to a strong group, who are skins just to belong to anything...
But if your thesis is that all skins can be counted as a group due to the ideology, then we should also require that the Jewry as a GROUP speaks out against Israel. |
I don't like to speak of people as a group, UNLESS we're speaking about the central element of the group, and the central group of skins is to hate non-aryans *** (see note below)
I know that with my English is difficult to understand my points, and even more, I'm not a great orator, but let's explain it with two question:
Would a skin be allowed to stay in a skin group after showing that he/she doesn't hate non-aryans?
Would a jew be not counted as a jew after attacking Israel?
The answer to the first question is yes and to the second no (in my humble opinion). So, it's normal that a muslim (or a jew) could verbally condemn ALL skins, becuase they always attack non-aryans (even when some of them doesn't feel hate towards non-aryans), but it is not fair to speak about jews as a group about Israel, because there are a lot of opinions about that issue in the jew comunity...
*** Note: Spaniards aren't aryans, but our skins doesn't hate white Spaniards: they hate jews, muslims, blacks; that's why I've care about saying that skins hate non-aryans... It varies from country to country, but they always hate the people that is different from the average 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
CyberGnu, you cannot excuse the discraceful actions of Moslem's by saying the French Jews should not associate themselves with Isreal. Yes, I agree free can go too far but it is NOT too far to associate one's self with thier 'home' country (in this case the innocent lad didnt even do this!). Remember what Afganistan did to America - thier terrorist harbouring led to Sept 11 so should Arabs who originally originated from Afganistan deny thier country??
Riduculas - it cannot be excused that Moslem's are out of order and that thier religion is now of MORE danger (to the world) than NAZI ideology....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yaroslav
|
 |
Madrid, Spain, Europe
Jun 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rothy
CyberGnu, you cannot excuse the discraceful actions of Moslem's by saying the French Jews should not associate themselves with Isreal. Yes, I agree free can go too far but it is NOT too far to associate one's self with thier 'home' country (in this case the innocent lad didnt even do this!). Remember what Afganistan did to America - thier terrorist harbouring led to Sept 11 so should Arabs who originally originated from Afganistan deny thier country??
Riduculas - it cannot be excused that Moslem's are out of order and that thier religion is now of MORE danger (to the world) than NAZI ideology.... |
Roothy, I want to say you
1) Israel is not the 'home' country for all jews. Many jews are not israelians. It's important to keep in mind that, altough, Israel is a 'jew state', not all jew are from Israel
2) I agree with you that taking association with a country is not going too far. It's important to understand that you associate with the people of these, and you can (or can not) disagree with the goverment of these country.
3) The muslim religion is not dangerous for the world, in my humble opinion. Only a small group of integrist are dangerous, but there are a (american) billion of muslim, and the vast majority of them are peace-lovers, like you and me 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
I just came back from my weekend.
Ned :
Racism in France isn't new, and its progression is very slow, even though one must acknowledge it exists. This racism is very politically incorrect, and the incarnation of racism, Le Pen, is harshly fought by the majority of the French. Last elections, he had 18% of votes, and the liar/crook Chirac got 82% of the votes, almost as much from the Republican right than from the Left (only the leftists didn't call to vote for Chirac). The demonstrations against Le Pen were impressive, and showed our fascist extraordianire is the most hated politician in France.
You shouldn't confuse our "antiamerican" policies with a regrowth of nationalism : few French people wave their flag like most Americans of this forum. In France, a forum like FFZ would be called a pack of far-right bigots. The officials of France, including Chirac, have made a big effort in acknowledging the horrors of the past (collaboration with the nazis, torture during the Algeria war), and most French people are perfectly aware we're not perfect, and have a less-than-spotless past. By the same token, nationalist rags like US News and World Report aren't imaginable in France.
The governments have failed fighting against the old racisms, anti-arab and anti-black. It has, however, nearly decimated the old antisemitism, which almost only belongs to old people now, and should die with them. It has a great deal to do to fight against the new racisms : new-look antisemitism, new-look anti-whitism, new-look anti-arabism. But these new racisms (and in fact the old ones save antisemitism) are all part of a bigger picture, that is the lack of integration and the existence of ghettos.
There is nearly no trace of nazism (that is : complete and genocidial hate for other races, mindless flagwaving, mmilitary agressiveness) in France.
The rise of racism sure is worrying, but you shouldn't jump to hastened conclusions. The rise of racism has been worrying in all European countries recently.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
quote: It's not a realistic supposition? |
Cybergnu:
Nice way of dealing with the point at hand. Ignore the point, and it may go away, will it not?
Muslims are being persecuted because some of the French are making the exact same argument that I did, that essentially all Muslims are the same, that if one Muslim is a terrorist they all are.
How is this position any different from yours, that essentially, all Jews oppress and hate the Muslims, and are thereby deserving of oppression themselves?
quote:
In a perfect world, no one would be persecuted for their religion. But in the real world, religion and politics mix... And basically, this is a political issue, not a religious one.
|
So your argument goes like this.
Our world is horrible, so we need to deal with the world by adopting the tactics of the world.
Tough. I say the only way to get out of the cycle of violence between Jews and Muslims is for both sides to see the other as a person, equally valuable.
That's why these kids, and they are kids, be they in France or in Israel are getting hurt, because some adults no longer see them as persons.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|