 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: One thing I didn't know is that a South Korean is playing for the Wild. Must be the first Korean in the NHL. |
No, I do believe that honour has already been bestowed on the wonderful ex-Penguin defenceman Jim Paek.
But I will go check the info to make sure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
dejon
|
|
Vancouver tied with Minnesota 3-3
Conference Finals start Saturday
East: New Jersey at Ottawa
West: Anaheim at either Vancouver or Minnesota
Well, I thought game five was all about the Canucks trying too hard and making stupid mistakes. Game six was more about the refs making stupid mistakes and Minnesota capitalizing on them until the Canucks felt out of it again.
A missed elbow to Cloutier, but called interference on Baron - Wild goal.
A missed offside call - Wild goal.
Tons of crosschecking and tripping of the Sedins - no calls.
Kudos to the Wild for their powerplay success. The Canucks are looking like they did a couple of years ago - an emotional team that doesn't respond well to pressure.
Crawford has to find a way to get them to play their game with zest, but with cool heads. And he has to get better line matchups - the top line has been useless because they're so paranoid about Gaborik.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dejon
Why?
Because the aging, overpaid almost-dynasty teams are finally fading?
Because young, exciting, talented teams are finally seeing the fruits of years of labour?
Or because, excluding New Jersey, you have to go back to 1927 (Ottawa) to find a past Cup winner that is left in these playoffs?
This changing of the guard has been a long time in the making, and is making the game better. It should be embraced, not scoffed at because it isn't the status quo. |
Yes and No... other than New Jersey... crap franchises are left. It would be like the Kansas City Royals and Milwaukee Brewers playing in the World Series. It's crap! Sorry, but I like to see the top guys in the hunt for the Finals. I bet the Wild will win, so what does this say about the strength of the league if the best players aren't in the hunt.
The only player that I would pay money to see on either Ottawa, New Jersy, Minnesota, or Anaheim; is Martin Brodeur... maybe Kariya, but that's it! I don't really care to watch a bunch of mullet-wearing Euro's play in the finals. Gaborik, Hossa, Alfredsson, Bonk, Naslund, etc... WHO CARES? NOT I!
Why do you think the NHL has reached it's peak in popularity? It was the fastest growing game in the United States in the 90's, now it has stagnated. Ratings are down. Attendence is down. Goals are down. It sucks. Once Lemieux is gone, there is hardly going to be any star power. And the semi-super-stars that are out there don't even make it to the latter rounds of the playoffs. What a piece of crap the NHL has turned into.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dejon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Yes and No... other than New Jersey... crap franchises are left. It would be like the Kansas City Royals and Milwaukee Brewers playing in the World Series. It's crap! Sorry, but I like to see the top guys in the hunt for the Finals. I bet the Wild will win, so what does this say about the strength of the league if the best players aren't in the hunt.
The only player that I would pay money to see on either Ottawa, New Jersy, Minnesota, or Anaheim; is Martin Brodeur... maybe Kariya, but that's it! I don't really care to watch a bunch of mullet-wearing Euro's play in the finals. Gaborik, Hossa, Alfredsson, Bonk, Naslund, etc... WHO CARES? NOT I!
Why do you think the NHL has reached it's peak in popularity? It was the fastest growing game in the United States in the 90's, now it has stagnated. Ratings are down. Attendence is down. Goals are down. It sucks. Once Lemieux is gone, there is hardly going to be any star power. And the semi-super-stars that are out there don't even make it to the latter rounds of the playoffs. What a piece of crap the NHL has turned into. |
I understand, and in fact share some of, your frustrations. The NHL grew too fast and diluted the talent pool, which has had many adverse effects: reduced scoring, increased defensive play, lower attendance, and a lack of perceived "star power".
In today's NHL (as most other team sports), individual (high-priced) players do not determine a team's fate.
Just look at the Rangers - big bucks, no chemistry, no prospects. Then checkout teams like Ottawa or Vancouver - good talent, no bank-busters, great farm prospects, and very good chemistry.
Doesn't the lesson of the Anaheim Angels ring a bell? Individuals do not win championships, teams do.
So your question "what does this say about the strength of the league if the best players aren't in the hunt?" is meaningless, and always has been. Gretzky didn't win on his own, and neither did Michael Jordan. The complaint should be that the owners/managers/coaches of the teams with the best players don't know how to build a team around them.
As for the veteran champion teams eliminated (Detroit, Colorado, Dallas) - there is a number of reasons they were beaten, but common factors include average player age, speed, and a management approach of renting missing components at the deadline, sacrificing the future. Last I checked, the only trade deadline move that is having any effect this year is Steve Thomas - that's a pretty poor average.
If you can't see or appreciate the talent of players like Hossa, Gaborik, or Naslund - the NHL is simply not your game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Last I checked, the only trade deadline move that is having any effect this year is Steve Thomas - that's a pretty poor average. |
Don't forget Rob Niedermayer!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Minnesota can become the first team ever to rally successfully from 3-1 deficits in the same postseason.
THE GAME HAS STARTED
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:27
|
|
Wow
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Gary Bettman is crying in his beer today.
Okay. Since I have completely underestimated both Minnesota and Anaheim, I have no idea who to pick in the Western Finals. We'll let the magic of Mr. Coin decide....
ANAHEIM IN... 7.
As for the East, much easier. Ottawa is a fantastic team, easily the most talented team remaining, plus they have some huge plusses as for as rooting for them go--a Canadian team, and one of the teams that are teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Only a complete jackass (or lifelong Devils fan, same thing) would root against the Sens. Which, of course, means
DEVILS IN 5.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dejon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
Only a complete jackass (or lifelong Devils fan, same thing) would root against the Sens. Which, of course, means
DEVILS IN 5. |
The two penalty calls against the Canucks were not bad calls in and of themselves, but in a game with no other calls, they make the refs look very bad. You can't swallow your whistle for almost the whole game, and then give powerplays to the team that is average 35%+ with the advantage. That is just poor officiating.
Not that I'm bitter though. As Obiwan said, the Canucks took themselves out of the series much earlier. They still suffer from inexperience, letting things get to them and sulking, or playing with too much emotion, recklessly.
I predict Ottawa vs. Anaheim, with the Senators winning.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:27
|
|
Anaheim in 6, Ottawa in 7.
Why? I have no idea. My predictions have mostly been wrong before, anyway...
I think Anaheim can keep it going, though... Maybe. Who knows?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|