 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
PLATO

|
 |
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
quote:
Azazel, other than Vietnam, care to share some examples for discussion?
|
Afghanistan- By supporting the Mujahedeen vs. the secular government that gave rights to women.
The vast majority of the SU- while western republics, such as thew baltic states are doing better, all others, which are the vast majority of the population of the SU are doing significantly worse, with the complete collapse of physical and socio-economical infrastructure. In central Asia, your new allies are just as autocratic as the soviet government, but are weaker, and allow muslim extremists to gain ground.
Check out the UN's Human Developement index of the Soviet union and it's followers. it collapsed after the fall of the SU. |
Okay Azazel, I'm following you. I thought that you were talking of places we had militarily intervened. I agree with your examples.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:27
|
|
Sure, people live better in Poland, Eastern Germany ( somewhat, very high unemployment, but the despotic regime is gone ), Chechoslovakia, Hungary are better. But the people of Yugoslavia, Moldavia, the Ukraine and Belarus ( weird country, btw), Kazakhstan, Georgia, The vast Majority of Russia, Kirgistan, and others, beg to differ.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
The soviet economy was dieing before the breakup of the empire. Things have to get worse before they can get better. Look at how the rest of europe compares. Had the soviets never been there, eastern europe would be prosperous like the rest of europe. All the problems they are now having can be laid at the feet of the communist empire. It will take some time for eastern europe to get back on its feet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
Level of evilness in US eyes:
Nazism > Communism > Fundamentalism > 'Normal' Dictatorships
The decision to use military means is a functions of:
F(perceived threat, estimated cost of war, level of evilness in US eyes, potential economic interests)
Apply this formula, you can find out the probability of an US-led intervention.
Iraq as a case study:
perceived threat = high
estimated cost of war = low
level of evilness in US eyes = medium ( Very very bad 'Normal' Dictatorship)
potential economic interests = high
Conclusion: WAR!
China as a case study:
perceived threat = low
estimated cost of war = very high (large scale nuclear war possible)
level of evilness in US eyes = medium high (Communism)
potential economic interests = very low
Conclusion: Engagement
North Korea as a case study:
perceived threat = high
estimated cost of war = high
level of evilness in US eyes = very high (Very very bad Communism)
potential economic interests = none
Conclusion: Undecided
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|