 |
|  |
 |
|
Master Zen
|
 |
of naughty
Jan 2003 time: 23:28
|
|
BTW, I was going to respond to the idea of this thread, not on this DC debate...
I think "patriotism" has gone overboard in the US. Theres really a limit to what is sane patriotism and what is just crazy right-wing nutness and sadly a lot of that is going around, at least that's what I felt the last time I visited which was about a year ago. I assume that due to the Iraq war it is even worse now. Loving one's country and wishing the best for it is IMO something that every citizen of every country should have. Support of its troops even despite a war being waged unjustly is also fair since those troops don't decide whether they want to fight or not, it's their job.
However, what ticks me off is how this "patriotism" has turned into mindless French-bashing (the ultimate in hipocrecy), blind belief in everything the government spits out, and narrowmindedness in hearing and especially accepting other points of view. I have always found if funny that the term "un-American" exists. I believe it is the only country which has such term, and even funnier that in a country which values individualism and diverstiy so much, it chooses to brand a concept as being "American" or not. What is "American"? Who has a monopoly on that definition? Why is not supporting the war, or supporting Bush seen by some as "un-American"?
If everyone has the liberty to say what they please, I find such a word almost a classic Orwellian example of doublespeak. 
Anyway, I applaud the people, like the person who started this thread, who doubt what is being said around them. They are in my book, far more patriotic than others who just go around spouting blasphemies in the name of their country.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Master Zen
I think "patriotism" has gone overboard in the US. Theres really a limit to what is sane patriotism and what is just crazy right-wing nutness and sadly a lot of that is going around, at least that's what I felt the last time I visited which was about a year ago. I assume that due to the Iraq war it is even worse now. Loving one's country and wishing the best for it is IMO something that every citizen of every country should have. Support of its troops even despite a war being waged unjustly is also fair since those troops don't decide whether they want to fight or not, it's their job.
...
Anyway, I applaud the people, like the person who started this thread, who doubt what is being said around them. They are in my book, far more patriotic than others who just go around spouting blasphemies in the name of their country. |
Right wing nuttiness! The problem with this post and the original post by John C. MacLeod are that it assumes that a belief that America is good and can do good is right wing nuttiness. Patriotism does not believe that United States is better than other countries and that Americans are better than other people. It believes in certain general principles such as democracy and human rights. We patriotic Americans are willing to fight for freedom, for ourselves for the sake of others. We are willing to fight and die to liberate people being oppressed by a Nazi dictator. We welcome the support of others in the world who believe the same as we do. This is inclusive, non exclusive. Our patriotism is a belief that we can do good and have done good in liberating Iraq. When we succeed in liberating a people and bringing them freedom and justice from oppression and murder, we are proud. Such is American patriotism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Master Zen
So, then, anyone who DOESN'T belive that you can do good and have doon good in liberating Iraq is un-Patriotic? See what I mean? 
Btw, don't even bring up democracy and human rights in the issue as there are countless examples of the US ignoring these things. |
Our patriotism is based on our fundamental belief in democracy and human rights. We Americans do not assist the likes of Britain and France against Germany, China against Japan, South Korea against the Russians and Chinese, etc., for empire. We do it for democracy and human rights.
Those who oppose America because they are against democracy or human rights are our enemies. Some oppose us because they believe that we are Imperialists, that we are aquiring an Empire. That, though, is the propaganda of our enemies who historically have been the left and now are the Islamic right.
Now, tell us how we fail test because of Batista. Yes, to the extent Truman supported that man in '52, Truman was wrong. But, at the time we supported him, if we did, did we know he would rule as a brutal corrupt dictator?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Master Zen
|
 |
of naughty
Jan 2003 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Our patriotism is based on our fundamental belief in democracy and human rights. We Americans do not assist the likes of Britain and France against Germany, China against Japan, South Korea against the Russians and Chinese, etc., for empire. We do it for democracy and human rights.
|
So, economic empire doesn't count... 
Democracy and human rights in China...once again, one of the US's biggest trade partners and notorious for precicely a lack of those two things you base your patriotism on. Tell me, are the congressmen and presidents who give MFN status to China traitors?
quote:
Those who oppose America because they are against democracy or human rights are our enemies. Some oppose us because they believe that we are Imperialists, that we are aquiring an Empire. That, though, is the propaganda of our enemies who historically have been the left and now are the Islamic right.
|
Frankly Ned, your discourse sounds to me the most recycled product of US propaganda imaginable, which for the record has been the single most effective propaganda maker in history (too bad it's starting to wear off thanks to Bush and co.). I can't believe you actually buy that...
...actually, I can. 
quote:
Now, tell us how we fail test because of Batista. Yes, to the extent Truman supported that man in '52, Truman was wrong. But, at the time we supported him, if we did, did we know he would rule as a brutal corrupt dictator? |
if we ended up a brutal corrupt dictator why didn't you topple him? the US seems to use that excuse whenever it does its dirty work, why is Batista exempted? Oh... let me guess why, he was a US ass-kisser, that's why. So, rule #1 if you want to be a corrupt dictator: kiss the US's ass and your rule is assured. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|