 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
didnt nazis think they were victims of the minority jews?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
anyone who wants to announce a union shuold be able to do so (and get full rights)
wether it is hetero, gay, or even non-sexual
my only problem with Bods example is the faking, they should be able to say that they are linked without pretending that there is something sexual occuring
also I would think that long term Hetero couples shuold get the benefits even if not married
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
bods just wants to ***** and moan and pretend like he has something to be righteous about. the thing is hes just an ordinary white guy from the UK who has nothing going for him so he has to adopt a cause that he feels empowers himself.
seriously though, he whines about heteros being treated unfairly but then whines about homosexuals get the same treatment heterosexuals with allowing marrige.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
It was illegal to be a man
|
Well, you've got no worries there then.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
..then it was wrong to be white
|
Yeah, but for you it's wrong to be any other colour and live in the UK.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Blatant discrimination against the majority yet again. How long will our once-great nation put up with this.
|
WTF are you talking about?
Straight people have to go to a registry office and get a certificate of mariage to get these rights. Now gay people can do the same.
What discrimination? You're just angry that gay people can have the same rights you can.
Do us a favour Bods. Move to Austria.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
dino, the problem is people like bods are now *****ing that heterosexual couples are getting robbed of something because of this. that somehow heterosexual partners should be able to have the same thing as homosexuals even though the homosexual version isnt as equitable as heterosexual marriges.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
Bodd's, do you think that one day it will be illegal not to be severely physically handicapped?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote:
Ministers will propose homosexuals should get the same tax, pension and property rights as married couples provided they register their relationships in a new-style civil ceremony.
The government is, however, expected to provoke controversy by denying the same rights to unmarried heterosexual couples in long-term relationships. It will fuel claims that the government is pandering to the gay lobby. |
Wait a second...how is the government denying the same right to unmarried heterosexual couples, when they have the right to get married? They can get all these benefits if they get married! Which is essentially what the gays have to do! What's the difference, Bods?
If you deny gays the right to marry, but set up a separate system wherein gays can have unions, but then so can straight people, isn't that just...silly? I mean, straight people already have the means of a union...marriage! So how are straight people being oppressed by this?

|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
bods is just a sorry sod bigot
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MRT144
dino, the problem is people like bods are now *****ing that heterosexual couples are getting robbed of something because of this. that somehow heterosexual partners should be able to have the same thing as homosexuals even though the homosexual version isnt as equitable as heterosexual marriges. |
NOT TRUE AT ALL.
If those hetero couples CANNOT BE BODDERED to go to a registry office and get hitch they deserve to be shafted on these rights issued.
If gay people have the same right of a legal ceremony giving them the same rights as hetero couples, HOW CAN THAT BE DISCRIMINATION?
The problem here is that those hetero couples are bone idle and/or ignorant. They think that by shacking up for 6 months that gives them "common law marriage" status.
It's time they learned the facts - and if they want their rights, get there lazy backsides down to the office and get hitched.
If they ignore the state, why shouldn't the state ignore them?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|