 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
reminds me of folks in my country who say they dont owe anything to blacks cause they werent alive during slavery. |
They don't as individuals owe blacks anything for slavery whatsoever. As indidivuals they owe blacks for either partaking or condoning a system in which they are still discriminated against. THAT is the debt, one of today, not of the past.
quote: I disagree. You accept the benefits and assets of being a citizen of a country, you accept its debts. No one says they shouldnt have to pay back govt bonds cause they werent alive when the debt was incurred - applies the same to debts that were never recognized, and to moral obligations as well as financial ones. |
Ctizenship is a legal definition, and one that can be changed. I assume you believe that if a kid is born in the US to American parents, but at legal age moves to a different country and renoucnes American citizenship and delcares himself citizen of another country, that is is utterly absolved of debts of his birth? As is is of any finantial debts the country he was once a citizen of? And of course, yo do assume he assumed the debts of the other, right? Case the guilt is based on a legally defined situation?
quote:
My country DOES have a special obligation to africa - as President Clinton recognized - |
American does have an olbigation to Africa, for things done during the lifetimes of many American officials that still live and may still hold power. We have an olbigation for our ongoing conduct, as a goernment and society, yes. But not for the century past.
quote:
and Germans have special obligations as well ( of course if they decide their nationality is European....?) |
I do nott hink so. They have oligations in the present and for the future, but not from the past.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by BeBro
That isn´t disputed here, of course this is true, and it is not affected by a European identity Germany could adopt (but I think we would never simply say we are not Germans, but Europeans, so we aren´t responsible). But this is not primarily an individual problem. When you ask me personally if I feel responsible for WWII or Holocaust, then the answer is "no, not at all". But this doesn´t mean that we are not aware of our history, and that Germany as a whole should not be committed to certain relations with Israel. But you can´t hold individuals responsible for things they never did, only because they are part of the same nation which did horrible things 50 years ago.
IMO, GP summed it up perfectly here:
|
i dont disagree with what you have said. This arose because i suggested that Germans should be aware of the role of the Italian army in WW2, and its contrast with the wehrmacht. This in a context where several posters, germans among them, were mocking the Italian army. I dont think that implies personal responsibility by contemporary Germans for the holocaust.
As a US citizen, I accept a national responsibility for slavery, despite it happenening before i was born or my ancestors came to the US. And if an American were to mock the performance of the Brit navy the 1840's, when britain had banned slavery and my nation had not, and someone pointed out the anti-slave trade activities of the brit navy, and said that as an american i should be particulary aware of them, i would think that appropriate.
(sudden flash - major image of Royal navy fighting the slave trade in recent american culture - from Spielberg's "Amistad" Spielberg also filmed "Schindlers List" paradigmatic image of a righteous German in recent American culture. so we go in circles)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
that's what I've been talking about all the time, has noone read my post on the matter?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
You don;t pay the national debt, you pay taxes. If the governemnt decides not to pay its debt, then that is the government's fault. your obligation to pay taxes now, as a duty of a citizen. It is politicians who decide spending priorities. |
i have a moral obligation to do what i can within a democratic system to ensure that the government pays its debt - and a similar moral obligation to see that the government pays it moral debts. And my obligations as a citizen may go beyond formal legal obligations, to acting as a meritorious citizen, in ways that reflect well on my country, and that take into account my country's moral obligations. my country pays its moral debts not only in actions of the government, but through actions of the people. ( i think we are getting into a split between a contractual definition of the state, rooted in 17th cent pol philosophy, and a notion that there are morally relevant social entities, families, nations, etc and human beings can have obligations beyond personal and contractual ones. i dont think we're going to resolve that here, and i think youre getting a little worked up about an aside about obligations of Germans to be aware of something. But then i get worked up about asides too, so who am i to complain? Lets just leave it now)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
GP, please... what happened to your handle change plans anyway?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
same here
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
precisely - i did not say guilt, i said obligation. |
If the German obligation is to remeber, and to know that they have done something wrong, believe me, they are more than living with this obligation.
If the German obligation is to shut up everytime they'd compare something evil with Hitler (btw, a horror they experienced first hand), and to shut up eveytime they are told being nazis, well, I don't agree with you.
BTW, Germany has made huge efforts into remebering and acknowledging its horrible past. France has recently been doing so recently. Where are the other countries ? Where does the US officially apologize for the Indian genocide ? Where does Australia officially apologize for the Native genocide ? Where does Japan officially apologize for WW2 horrors ? Where does Turkey officially apologize for the 1915 genocide ?
Face it, the Krauts (and to some extent the Frogs) are the ones who can give lessons when it comes to the "obligation of memory".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
If the German obligation is to remeber, and to know that they have done something wrong, believe me, they are more than living with this obligation.
If the German obligation is to shut up everytime they'd compare something evil with Hitler (btw, a horror they experienced first hand), and to shut up eveytime they are told being nazis, well, I don't agree with you.
BTW, Germany has made huge efforts into remebering and acknowledging its horrible past. France has recently been doing so recently. Where are the other countries ? Where does the US officially apologize for the Indian genocide ? Where does Australia officially apologize for the Native genocide ? Where does Japan officially apologize for WW2 horrors ? Where does Turkey officially apologize for the 1915 genocide ?
Face it, the Krauts (and to some extent the Frogs) are the ones who can give lessons when it comes to the "obligation of memory". |
i do not think Germans are required to shut up whenever they are told they are Nazis. I never said so.
Do the germans have the right to compare other evils with Nazis? Im not sure. I have trouble with anyone comparing other evils to the holocaust - i have trouble with Jews directly comparing other evils to the holocaust (though i realize i have said things that might be read that way - im sorry if i was sloppy) And yes, i would say that applies a fortiori to Germans.
Should the US officially apologize for past mis-deeds? President Clinton apologized to Africa for the slave trade. I thought he was right to do so. Should we officially apologize for misdeeds against American Indians - I would agree. We have done much here to focus on the history of african americans, including slavery and Jim Crow, and on the history of Native Americans.
I am quite aware of what the FRG has done in holocaust awareness, memory and eductation, and I quite admire it. I was not saying that the FRG has failed in that regard, i was making an aside in regard to a fairly narrow issue. I dont think I was wrong, but i now think my turn of phrase has taken away from what i intended to say, and i regret it.
I do note that the person posting anti-semitic material is someone from that portion of Germany not originally part of the FRG, where, IIUC, holocaust remembrance and education were profoundly different than in the FRG. OTOH I assumed he was young enough he'd be a product of the FRG educational system. I hope this way of thinking is not common in the eastern lander of todays FRG.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Not realy. You assume a moral system in which debts exists. The government can i theory incurr finatial debt forever,.a s long as it could both service it and meet other fiscal responsibilities. Of course, the goevrnment could always nullify its debt and move on. I assume you don't think "moral debts" can just be defaulted on?
I believe in moral responsibilities for individuals and groups, but not in moral debts for groups, only for individuals. |
Only an individual can be a moral actor. Well, of course.
But i may have moral obligations relating to my role in the state. Suppose the US govt does something negligent - lets say it runs experiments on people by not treating them for syphilis for example. They sue for damages. Lets say the govt decides to default on that obligation. Of course its defaulting on a legal obligation,not a moral one, since its not a moral actor. Suppose now it becomes a matter for debate during an election campaign, and one politician says we should make a payment to the those who were wronged in this experiment, and another says no. Do I have a moral obligation to (ceteris paribus) to vote for the one calling for payment to the victims - I would argue that I do have such an obligation.
I would go further (though its not necessary for the above point) that i have such an obligation, even though said experiment happened before I was born.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
you were making fun of those shot at the border. those were not collaborators.
I'm a friend of chemistry, so stop being nasty. I bet lotm is not.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|